[1]
|
Ashworth, L. M. (2002). Did the realist-idealist great debate really happen? A revisionist history of international relations. International Relations, 16, 33-51. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0047117802016001004
|
[2]
|
Bell, D. (2008). Introduction: Under an empty sky-realism and political theory. In D. Bell (Eds.), Political thought and international relations. Variations on a realist theme (pp. 2-21). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
|
[3]
|
Bentley, M. (2011). The life and thought of Herbert Butterfield. History, science and god. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511782473
|
[4]
|
Brown, C. (1992). International relations theory: New normative approaches. New York: Columbia University Press.
|
[5]
|
Brown, C. (1997). Understanding international relations. Basingstoke: Macmillan.
|
[6]
|
Brown, C., Nardin, T., & Rengger N. (2002). International relations in political thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511808784
|
[7]
|
Brunner, E. (1956). Some remarks on reinhold niebuhr’s work as a christian thinker. In C. W. Kegley, & R. W. Bretall (Eds.), Reinhold Niebuhr. His religious, social, and political thought (pp. 27-33). New York: MacMillan.
|
[8]
|
Bull, H. (1966). International theory: The case for a classical approach. World Politics, 18, 361-377. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2009761
|
[9]
|
Bundy, M. (1963). Foreign policy: From innocence to engagement. In A. M. Schlesinger, & M. White (Eds.), Paths of american thought (pp. 293-308). Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company.
|
[10]
|
Carr, E. H. (1939). The twenty years’ crisis 1919-1939. An introduction to the study of international relations. London: MacMillan.
|
[11]
|
Cochran, M. (1999). Normative theory in international relations: A pragmatic approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
|
[12]
|
Curtis, S., & Koivisto, M. (2010). Towards a second “second debate”? Rethinking the relationship between science and history in international theory. International Relations, 24, 433-455. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0047117810386071
|
[13]
|
Diggings, J. P. (2011). Why niebuhr now? Chicago: University of Chicago Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226148861.001.0001
|
[14]
|
Donnelly, J. (2000). Realism and international relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226148861.001.0001
|
[15]
|
Dunne, T. (1998). Inventing international society. A history of the English school. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan. http://dx.doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226148861.001.0001
|
[16]
|
Easton, D. (1962). The current meaning of “Behavioralism” in political science. In J. S. Charlesworth (Ed.), The limits of behavioralism (pp. 8-25). Philadelphia: The American Academy of Political and Social Science.
|
[17]
|
Easton, D. (1969). The new revolution in political science. American Political Science Review, 63, 1051-1061. http://dx.doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226148861.001.0001
|
[18]
|
Elie, P. (2007). A man for all reasons. The Atlantic Monthly. http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2007/11/a-man-for-all-reasons/306337/#
|
[19]
|
Epp, R. (1991). The “Augustinian Moment” in international politics. Niebuhr, Butterfield, Wight and the reclaiming of a tradition. International Politics Research Paper, 10, Aberystwyth: Department of International Politics.
|
[20]
|
Epp, R. (2003). The ironies of Christian realism: The end of an Augustinian Tradition in international politics. In E. Patterson (Ed.), The Christian realists: Reassessing the contributions of Niebuhr and his contemporaries (pp. 199-232). Lanham: University Press of America.
|
[21]
|
Frost, M. (1986). Toward a normative theory of international relations: A critical analysis of the philosophical and methodological assumptions in the discipline with proposals toward a substantive normative theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511898228
|
[22]
|
Frost, M. (1996). Ethics in international relations: A constitutive theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511521706
|
[23]
|
Hall, I. (2002). History, Christianity and diplomacy: Sir Herbert Butterfield and international relations. Review of International Studies, 28, 719-736. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0260210502007192
|
[24]
|
Hall, I. (2006). The international thought of Martin Wight. New York: Palgrave. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/9781403983527
|
[25]
|
Halliwell, M. (2005). The constant dialogue. Reinhold Niebuhr and American intellectual culture. Lanham: Rowan & Littlefield.
|
[26]
|
Hoffman, S. (1977). An American social science: International relations. Daedalus, 106, 41-60.
|
[27]
|
Holder, R. W., Josephson, P. B., The irony of Barack Obama: Barack Obama, Reinhold Niebuhr and the problem of Christian statecraft. Farnham: Ashgate.
|
[28]
|
Hollis, M., & Smith, S. (1990). Explaining and understanding international relations. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
|
[29]
|
Jones, C. (2003). Christian realism and the foundations of the english school, International Relations, 17, 371-387. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/00471178030173007
|
[30]
|
Kaplan, M. (1957). System and Process in international politics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
|
[31]
|
Kaplan, M. (1966). The new Great Debate: Traditionalism vs. science in international relations. World Politics, 19, 1-20. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2009840
|
[32]
|
Kurki, M., & Wight, C. (2006). International relations and social science. In T. Dunne, M. Kurki, & S. Smith (Eds.), International relations theories: Disciplines and diversity (pp. 13-33). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
|
[33]
|
La Feber, W. (1976). America, Russia, and the Cold War 1945-1975. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
|
[34]
|
Landon, H. R. (1962). Editor’s introduction. In H. R. Landon (Ed.), Reinhold Niebuhr: A prophetic voice in our time (pp. 11-25). Greenwich: Seabury Press.
|
[35]
|
Lapid, Y. (1989). The third debate: On the prospects of international theory in a post-positivist era. International Studies Quarterly, 33, 235-254.
|
[36]
|
Linklater, A., & Suganami, H. (2006). The English school of international relations: A contemporary reassessment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511491528
|
[37]
|
Mearsheimer, J. J. (2001). The tragedy of great power politics. New York: Norton & Company.
|
[38]
|
Morgenthau, H. J. (1946). Scientific man vs. power politics. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
|
[39]
|
Morgenthau, H. J. (1962). The influence of Reinhold Niebuhr in American political life and thought. In H. R. Landon (Ed.), Reinhold Niebuhr: A prophetic voice in our time (pp. 97-109). Greenwich: Seabury Press.
|
[40]
|
Nardin, T. (1983). Law, morality and the relations of states. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
|
[41]
|
Niebuhr, R. (1932). Moral man and immoral society: A study in ethics and politics. New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons.
|
[42]
|
Niebuhr, R. (1940). Christianity and power politics. New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons.
|
[43]
|
Niebuhr, R. (1941-1943). The nature and destiny of man: A Christian interpretation. New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons.
|
[44]
|
Niebuhr, R. (1944). The children of light and the children of darkness: A vindication of democracy and a critique of its traditional defense. New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons.
|
[45]
|
Niebuhr, R. (1946). Discerning the signs of the time: Sermons for today and tomorrow. New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons.
|
[46]
|
Niebuhr, R. (1949). Faith and history: A comparison of Christian and modern views of history. New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons.
|
[47]
|
Niebuhr, R. (1952). The irony of American history. New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons.
|
[48]
|
Niebuhr, R. (1953). Augustine’s political realism. In Christian realism and political problems (pp. 119-146). New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons.
|
[49]
|
Niebuhr, R. (1956). Intellectual autobiography of Reinhold Niebuhr. In C. W. Kegley, & R. W. Bretall (Eds.), Reinhold Niebuhr: His religious, social, and political thought (pp. 1-24). New York: MacMillan.
|
[50]
|
Niebuhr, R. (1959). Nations and empires: Recurring patterns in the political order. London: Faber.
|
[51]
|
Niebuhr, R. (1965). Man’s nature and his communities: Essays on the dynamics and enigmas of man’s personal and social existence. New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons.
|
[52]
|
O’Connor, F. (1969). Mystery and manners. New York: Farrar, Straus & Giroux.
|
[53]
|
Patterson, E. (2003). Niebuhr and his contemporaries: Introduction to Christian realism. In E. Patterson (Ed.), The Christian realists: Reassessing the contributions of Niebuhr and his contemporaries (pp. 1-24). Lanham, MD: University Press of America.
|
[54]
|
Patterson, E. (2003). Niebuhr and his critics: Realistic optimism in world politics. In E. Patterson (Ed.), The Christian realists: Reassessing the contributions of Niebuhr and his contemporaries (pp. 25-51). Lanham, MD: University Press of America.
|
[55]
|
Quirk, J., & Vigneswaran, D. (2005). The construction of an edifice: The story of a First Great Debate. Review of International Studies, 31, 89-107. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0260210505006315
|
[56]
|
Rice, D. F. (2012). Reinhold Niebuhr and his circle of influence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139207737
|
[57]
|
Rosenthal, J. H. (1991). Righteous realists: Political realism, responsible power, and American culture in the Nuclear Age. Baton Rouge, LA: Louisiana State University Press.
|
[58]
|
Schlesinger, A. (1956). Reinhold Niebuhr’s role in American political thought and life. In C. W. Kegley, & R. W. Bretall (Eds.), Reinhold Niebuhr: His religious, social, and political thought (pp. 125-150). New York: MacMillan.
|
[59]
|
Schlesinger, A. (1992). Reinhold Niebuhr’s long shadow. New York Times, 22 June.
|
[60]
|
Schlesinger, A. (2005). Forgetting Reinhold Niebuhr. New York Times, 18 September.
|
[61]
|
Singer, D., & Small, M. (1966). The composition and status ordering of the international system 1815-1840. World Politics, 18, 236-282. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2009697
|
[62]
|
Smith, M. J. (1986). Realist thought from Weber to Kissinger. Baton Rouge, LA: Louisiana State University Press.
|
[63]
|
Smith, T. W. (1995). The uses of tragedy: Reinhold Niebuhr’s theory of history and international ethics. Ethics and International Affairs, 9, 171-191. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-7093.1995.tb00177.x
|
[64]
|
Smith, S., Booth, K., & Zalewski, M. (1996). International theory: Positivism and beyond. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511660054
|
[65]
|
Thompson, K. W. (1955). Beyond national interest: Evaluation of Reinhold Niebuhr’s theory of international politics. The Review of Politics, 17, 167-188. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0034670500013061
|
[66]
|
Waever, O. (1996). The rise and fall of the inter-paradigm debate. In S. Smith, K. Booth, & M. Zalewski (Eds.), International theory: Positivism and beyond (pp. 149-185). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511660054.009
|
[67]
|
Waltz, K. (1979). Theory of international politics. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
|
[68]
|
Wight, M. (1966). Western values in international relations. In H. Butterfield, & M. Wight (Eds.), Diplomatic investigations: Essays in the theory of international politics (pp. 89-131). London: Allen & Unwin.
|
[69]
|
Wilson, P. (1998). The myth of the ‘First Great Debate’. Review of International Studies, 24, 1-16. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0260210598000011
|
[70]
|
Wrightson, P. S. (1996). Morality, realism, and foreign affairs: A normative realist approach. In B. Frankel (Ed.), Roots of realism (pp. 354-386). London: Frank Cass.
|
[71]
|
Zambernardi, L. (2010). I limiti della Potenza. Etica e politica nella teoria internazionale di Hans J. Morgenthau. Bologna: Il Mulino.
|