Differential GPS: the reduced-difference approach

Andre. Lannes

L2S, Supelec, 3, rue Joliot-Curie, 91192 Gif-sur-Yvette cedex, France.

DOI:                 

Abstract

In the traditional approach to differential GNSS, the satellite error terms are eliminated by forming the so-called single differences (SD). One then gets rid of the receiver error terms by computing, for each receiver to be considered, the corresponding double differences (DD): the discrepancies between the single differences (SD) and one of them taken as reference. To handle the SD's in a homogeneous manner, one may equally well consider the discrepancies between the SD's and their mean value. In this paper, these "centralized differential data" are referred to as "reduced differences" (RD). In the case where the GNSS devices include only two receivers, this approach is completely equivalent to "double centralization." More precisely, the information contained in the "double centralized observations" is then a simple antisymmetric transcription of that contained in the reduced differences. The ambiguities are then rational numbers which are related to the traditional integer ambiguities in a very simple manner. The properties established in this paper shed a new light on the corresponding analysis. (The extension to GNSS networks with missing data will be presented in a forthcoming paper.) The corresponding applications concern the identification of outliers in real time. Cycle slips combined with miscellaneous SD biases can thus be easily identified.

Keywords

GNSS, DGPS, centralized undifferential methods, RTK. Data assimilation, DIA

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

[1]	Agrell E., Eriksson T., Vardy A. and Zeger K. (2002) Closest point search in lattices. IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory. 48: 2201-2214.
[2]	Bjorck A. (1996) Numerical methods for least-squares problems. SIAM.
[3]	Hewitson S., Lee H. K. and Wang J. (2004) Localizability analysis for GPS/Galileo receiver autonomous integrity monitority. The Journal of Navigation, Royal Institute of Navigation 57: 245-259.
[4]	Lannes A. and Durands S. (2003) Dual algebraic formulation of differential GPS. J. Geod. 77: 22-29.
[5]	Lannes A. (2008) GNSS networks with missing data: identifiable biases and potential outliers. Proc. ENC GNSS-2008. Toulous, France.
[6]	Shi P. H. and Han S. (1992) Centralized undifferential method for GPS network adjustment. Australian Journal of Geodesy, Photogrammetry and Surveying. 57: 89-100.
[7]	Strang G. and Borre K. (1997) Linear algebra, geodesy, and GPS, Wellesley-Cambridge Press, Massachussets.
[8]	Teunissen P.J.G. (1990) An integrity and quality control procedure for use in multi sensor integration. Proc. ION GPS-90. Colorado Springs. Colorado USA: 513-522.
[9]	Teunissen P.J.G. (1995) The least-squares ambiguity decoration adjustment: a method for fast GPS integer ambiguity estimation. J. Geod. 70:65-82.
[10]	Tiberius C. C. J. M. (1998) Recursive data processing for kinematic GPS surveying. Publications on Geodesy. New series: ISSN 0165 1706, Number 45. Netherlands Geodetic Commission, Delft.