Highly conserved domains in hemagglutinin of influenza viruses characterizing dual receptor binding

Wei Hu
DOI: 10.4236/ns.2010.29123                

Abstract

The hemagglutinin (HA) of influenza viruses in itiates virus infection by binding receptors on host cells. Human influenza viruses preferenti ally bind to receptors with α2,6 linkages to gala ctose, avian viruses prefer receptors with α2,3 linkages to galactose, and swine viruses favor both types of receptors. The pandemic H1N1 2009 remains a global health concern in 2010. The novel 2009 H1N1 influenza virus has its ge netic components from avian, human, and sw ine viruses. Its pandemic nature is characterized clearly by its dual binding to the α2,3 as well as α2,6 receptors, because the seasonal human H1N1 virus only binds to the α2,6 receptor. In pr evious studies, the informational spectrum me thod (ISM), a bioinformatics method, was appli ed to uncover highly conserved regions in the HA protein associated with the primary receptor binding preference in various subtypes. In the present study, we extended the previous work by discovering multiple domains in HA associa ted with the secondary receptor binding prefer ence in various subtypes, thus characterizing the distinct dual binding nature of these viruses. The domains discovered in the HA proteins were mapped to the 3D homology model of HA, which could be utilized as therapeutic and diag nostic targets for the prevention and treatment of influenza infection.

Keywords

Binding Specificity; Discrete Fourier Transform; ElectronIon Interaction Potential;Hemagglutinin; Influenza; Informational Spectrum Method

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

[1]	Gambaryan, A., Tuzikov, A., Pazynina, G. et al. (2006) Evolution of the receptor binding phenotype of influenza A (H5) viruses. Virology, 344(2), 432438.
[2]	Iwata, T., Fukuzawa, K., Nakajima, K., et al. (2008) Theoretical analysis of binding specificity of influenza viral hemagglutinin to avian and human receptors based on the fragment molecular orbital method. Computational Biology and Chemistry, 32(3), 198211.
[3]	Yamada, S., Suzuki, Y., Suzuki, T., et al. (2006) Haemagglutinin mutations responsible for the binding of H5N1 influenza A viruses to humantype receptors. Nature, 444(7117), 378382.
[4]	Soundararajan, V., Tharakaraman, K., et al. (2009) Extrapolating from sequence—the 2009 H1N1 ‘swine’ influenza virus. Nature Biotechnology, 27(6), 510513.
[5]	Childs, R.A., Palma, A.S., Wharton, S., et al. (2009) Receptorbinding specificity of pandemic influenza A (H1N1) 2009 virus determined by carbohydrate microarray. Nature Biotechnology, 27(9), 797799.
[6]	Hu, W. (2009) Analysis of Correlated Mutations, Stalk Motifs, and Phylogenetic Relationship of the 2009 Influ enza A Virus Neuraminidase Sequences. Journal of Bio medical Science and Engineering, 2(7), 550558.
[7]	Hu, W. (2010) The Interaction between the 2009 H1N1 Influenza A Hemagglutinin and Neuraminidase: Mutati ons, Comutations, and the NA Stalk Motifs. Journal of Biomedical Science and Engineering, 3(1), 112.
[8]	Hu, W. (2010) Novel host markers in the 2009 pandemic H1N1 influenza A virus. Journal of Biomedical Science and Engineering, 3(6), 584601.
[9]	Hu, W. (2010) Nucleotide host markers in the influenza a viruses. Journal of Biomedical Science and Engineering, 3(7), 684699.
[10]	Mehle, A. and Doudna, J.A. (2009) Adaptive strategies of the influenza virus polymerase for replication in humans, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 106(50), 2131221316.
[11]	Cosic, I. (1997) The resonant recognition model of macro molecular bioreactivity, theory and application. Birkhauser Verlag, Berlin.
[12]	Veljkovic, V., Niman, H.L., Glisic, S., et al. (2009) Identification of hemagglutinin structural domain and polymorphisms which may modulate swine H1N1 interactions with human receptor. BMC Structural Biology, 9, 62.
[13]	Veljkovic, V., Veljkovic, N., Muller, C.P., Müller, S., Glisic, S., Perovic, V. and K?hler, H. (2009) Characterization of conserved properties of hemagglutinin of H5N1 and human influenza viruses: possible consequences for therapy and infection control. BMC Structural Biology, 7, 921.
[14]	Hu, W. (2010) Identification of highly conserved dom ains in hemagglutinin associated with the receptor binding specificity of influenza viruses: 2009 H1N1, avian H5N1, and swine H1N2. Journal of Biomedical Science and Engineering, 3(2), 114123.
[15]	Hu, W. (2010) Quantifying the effects of mutations on re ceptor binding specificity of influenza viruses. Journal of Biomedical Science and Engineering, 3(3), 227240.
[16]	Katoh, K., Kuma, K., Toh, H. and Miyata, T. (2005) MAFFT version 5: improvement in accuracy of multiple sequence alignment. Nucleic Acids Research, 33(2), 511518.
[17]	KováccaronOVá, A., RuttkayNedecky, G., HaverlíK, I.K., and Janecccaronek, S. (2002) Sequence Similarities and Evolutionary Relationships of Influenza Virus A Hemagglutinins. Virus Genes, 24(1), 57 63.
[18]	Gamblin, S.J., Haire, L.F., Russell, R.J., Stevens, D.J., Xiao, B., Ha, Y. et al. (2004) The Structure and Receptor Binding Properties of the 1918 Influenza Hemagglutinin. Science, 303(5665), 18381842.