Oscillator Subject to Periodic and Random Forces ()

Moshe Gitterman

Department of Physics, Bar Ilan University, Ramat Gan, Israel.

**DOI: **10.4236/jmp.2013.41015
PDF
HTML XML
4,124
Downloads
6,378
Views
Citations

Department of Physics, Bar Ilan University, Ramat Gan, Israel.

We illustrate the influence of an external periodic force and noise on a physical system by the example of an oscillator. These two forces seem to be the reverse of each other, since the latter leads to disorder while the former works in an orderly fashion. Nevertheless, it is shown that they may influence a system in a similar way, sometime even substituting for one another. These examples serve to illustrate one of the main achievements of twentieth-century physics, which has established that deterministic and random phenomena complement rather than contradict each other.

Keywords

Stochastic Oscillator; Periodic Force; Stochastic and Vibrational Resonances; Birth-Death Process

Share and Cite:

M. Gitterman, "Oscillator Subject to Periodic and Random Forces," *Journal of Modern Physics*, Vol. 4 No. 1, 2013, pp. 94-98. doi: 10.4236/jmp.2013.41015.

1. Introduction

Physical intuition suggests that the action of periodic (for instance, sinusoidal) and random (for instance, white noise) forces on a physical system act in the reverse manner, namely, the latter leads to disorder while the former works in an orderly fashion. The best known example against this conclusion is the phenomenon of fluctuation driven transport and the stochastic resonance [1], where the noise helps to increase a weak input signal. In addition to the stochastic resonance, there are different phenomena showing that noise may be a source of order rather than disorder. Let us mention noise-induced transitions [2], noise-induce transport [3], noise-induced pattern formation [4], noise-induced resonances [5], noiseenhanced stability [6], noise-induced hypersensitivity [7], resonance activation [8], stochastic transport in ratches [9], stochastic localization [10], self-organization and dissipative structures [11], coherent stochastic resonance [12], fluctuation barrier kinetics [13] and amplification of weak signals via on-off intermittency [14].

However, according to the second law of thermodynamics, a system naturally progresses from order to disorder and not in the opposite direction. The explanation of this apparent paradox is that noise does not transfer energy to a system, playing the role of a tuner (like emitter in a transistor), helping the system absorb more energy from the external force [15]. In this note, using the simple example of an oscillator, we give other examples of such “unnatural” behavior of noise and a periodic signal. This example is complementary to that of a classical rotor, where it was shown [16] that “order and chaos are complementary rather than contradictory”.

2. Overdamped Harmonic Oscillator

The simple equation

(1)

can be solved both in the absence and in the presence of white noise of strength In the former case, the solution is which vanishes at In the presence of noise, the average moment

(2)

diverges as for i.e., noise plays its usual “destructive” role.

With an additional periodic force,

(3)

the solution of Equation (3) performs oscillations with the frequency for as expected for a periodic external force. However, as we will show, the situation is not so simple for nonlinear equations.

One can illustrate the appearance of stochastic resonance by Equation (3) with dichotomous noise of strength and rate for transitions and For the limiting case the particle executes periodic motion with an amplitude. If there is no random force, , for, the particle moves along the parabola. For dichotomous noise, the particle moves along the parabola

then jumps at rate to the parabola

etc.

For, but

these two parabolas have curvatures of opposite sign, and thus they act in opposite directions tending to increase (decrease) the displacement of the particle. Their mutual influence is defined by noise which causes jumps between the parabolas and by a periodic force which determines the amplitude of oscillations along the parabolas. Accordingly, the amplitude of the stationary output signal has a maximum as a function of noise strength (stochastic resonance).

3. Birth-Death Process

The birth-death differential equation for positive

(4)

has an exact solution. The associated potential energy

is shown in Figure 1. There are two two fixed points and which are stable for and respectively. If the parameter fluctuates, , with white noise , Equation (4) has two control parameters, and For the fixed point is stable. For the point becomes unstable but most probable for Finally, for the point becomes stable.

Let us now add a periodic force to Equation (4),

(5)

If the amplitude of the external field is smaller than the barrier height, the particle will never leave the well provided that the initial position satisfies the condition

Figure 1. A single-well potential.

(6)

This follows from the fact that for obeying Equation (6), the right-hand side of Equation (5) has two real roots, and implying that and the particle is trapped. Although the dependence of the solution of Equation (5) on is physically obvious, the dependence on the field frequency is not so obvious. It turns out that even a change of only in the frequency changes the time at which the particle escapes from the potential well.

Consider now the common action of both random and periodic forces,

(7)

The numerical solution of Equation (7) shows that for not too small, both the periodic force and the noise increase the escape time, i.e., these two factors act in the same direction. However, adding noise to a periodically driven system will increase the escape time for some noise strengths. This effect is known as noise-enhanced stability [17].

4. Piece-Wise Potential

Since the behavior of a system is probably not too sensitive to the exact form of the nonlinear potential, we consider the simplest form of the piece-wise potential, shown in Figure 2,

(8)

Figure 2. The triangle piece-wise potential described by Equation (8).

where is the height of the potential barrier, and is the absorbing boundary. The states for are metastable, and those for are unstable. The overdamped periodically driven motion of a particle in the potential (8) is described by the following equation

(9)

with white noise of strength

Consider first the time-independent potential. If the initial position of a particle is unstable, , the average escape time grows in the presence of noise since the particle may jump into the potential well. For very weak noise, the probability of such jumps is very low. If only these jumps are operating, the particle will be trapped in the well for a long time (noise enhanced stability).

Consider now For the particle at will move according to the equation

.

If, the particle will always remain inside the region. However, if the particle surmounts the region and its position will change with time as

(10)

and

(11)

where is the time at which the particle crosses the point,

(12)

Noise enhanced stability occurs at time (when the periodic force changes it sign), tending to return the particle to the region and the particle is still located inside the interval,. Using (12) and (11), the latter inequality can be rewritten as

(13)

In addition to the inequality Equation (13) defines the conditions for the appearance of the noise enhanced stability. Therefore, both noise and a periodic force influence the escape time of a particle in a metastable state, thereby increasing the stability of the system. Another form of potential barrier is the rectangular bistable potential shown in Figure 3. The barriers heights and are different for the right (stable) and the left (metastable) states. For such a form of the potential, there is no force in the equation of motion, which has the following form

(14)

For the case one can easily solve the Fokker-Planck equation associated with the Langevin equation (14) in each of the three regions in Figure 3 and find the integration constants from the matching conditions on two boundaries between different regions complemented by reflection boundary conditions at the walls, Finally, one can find the time-independent number of particles and in the right (stable) and in the left (metastable) wells, respectively. Therefore, the population of a metastable state can be increased by adding an external periodic field or by fluctuations of the barrier height. The analogous situation exists with a simple pendulum which is stable (metastable) in the vertically downward (upward) position. One can, however, stabilize a metastable position by high-frequency harmonic vibrations of its suspension parametric oscillations of a pendulum (“Kapitza pendulum” [18]).

An external force in Equation (14) can be chosen as a periodic force acting on the left well or as a random force acting on the barrier. It turns out that for both cases, an external force tends to equalize the populations as (stabilizing the metastable state), and even reversing the populations of these states. Our choice of the periodic signal does not introduce an additional force into the equation of motion, and the periodic signal enters only in the matching conditions. It turns out that with the help of an external periodic field, one can increase the population of the left (metastable) state, or even reverse the populations [19].

Figure 3. The rectangular piece-wise bistable potential.

5. Harmonic Oscillator with Random Mass

Recently we considered a harmonic oscillator subject to the periodic force and white noise of strength with asymmetric (and) dichotomous random mass, which is described by the following equation

(15)

where and The asymptotic values of the first two moments and have been found in [20].

For Equation (15) describes Brownian motion with adhesion, when the surrounding molecules not only collide with the Brownian particle, inducing zigzag motion, but also adhere to it for a random time. For this case, the stationary second moment of the velocity of the Brownian particle has the following form [20]

(16)

Let us consider the different limiting cases of Equation (16).

1) In the absence of an external field, the second moment is given by

(17)

i.e., becomes negative for large strength of the mass fluctuations, showing an instability of the system, i.e., a system cannot reach a stationary state.

2) In the absence of the mass fluctuation, the system becomes unstable for large amplitude of the external periodic field.

In both cases, the instability occurs due to the violation of the energetic balance (fluctuation-dissipation theorem) for the Brownian motion, namely, the energy gained by a system due to the external field or due to fluctuations is not balanced by the friction. However, Equation (16) shows that including a strong external field in the former case or large fluctuations in the latter case, one can restore the energetic balance and the stability of a system. Therefore, both the external periodic force and fluctuations are able to be “ordering” factors.

6. Vibrational Resonance

As we have already seen, a shift of the stable points occurs either through multiplicative noise or through a parametric periodic force, although the physical mechanism is quite different. Indeed, this effect occurs because of the low frequencies of the correlator of noise and the high frequencies of an external field. It turns out that the analogous effect occurs for two additive periodic fields. A bistable underdamped oscillator subject to two periodic fields is described by the following equation

(18)

Analogous to Equation (7), the stochastic resonance occurs also in a bistable underdamped oscillator described by the following Equations [21,22]

(19)

One can link the last two equations. The phenomenon of the stochastic resonance, described by Equation (19), was considered previously. We now turn to the analysis of Equation (18). Suppose that one of the fields has a large amplitude (larger than the barrier height), and high frequency, . The former means that during each half-period, this field transfers the particle from one potential well to the other. A similar situation holds in a random system where the large amplitude field in (18) is replaced by an additive random force, which plays the same role of switching the particle between the two minima. Therefore, by choosing the appropriate relation between the input signal and the amplitude of the large signal (or the strength of noise), one can obtain a non-monotonic dependence of the output signal on the noise strength (stochastic resonance as considered before) or on the amplitude (vibrational resonance [21]). Therefore, paradoxically the “ordered” periodic signal and “disordering” noise play analogous roles in stochastic and vibrational resonances.

7. Conclusion

As it follows from all the examples considered, periodic and random signals do not unnecessarily act in opposite directions. They may play the same role, sometimes even substituting for one another in both above considered linear (overdamped harmonic oscillator, harmonic oscillator with random mass, harmonic oscillator with piecewise potentials) and nonlinear (birth-death process, vibrational resonance) systems.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

[1] | R. Dean Astumian and F. Moss, “Overview: The Constructive Role of Noise in Fluctuations of Driven Transport and Stochastic Resonance,” Chaos, Vol. 8, No. 5, 1998, pp. 533-539. doi:10.1063/1.166334 |

[2] | W. Horsthemke and R. Lefever, “Noise-Induced Transitions,” Springer, Berlin, 1084. |

[3] | P. Hanggi and R. Bartussek, “Lecture Notes in Physics,” Springer, Berlin, 1996. |

[4] | J. M. R. Parrondo, C. Van den Broeck and F. de la Rubia, “Noise-Induced Spatial Patterns,” Physica A, Vol. 224, No. 1-2, 1996, pp. 153-161. doi:10.1016/0378-4371(95)00350-9 |

[5] | P. Yung and P. Talkner, “Suppression of Higher Harmonics at Noise Induced Resonances,” Physical Review E, Vol. 51, No. 3, 1995, pp. 2640-2643. doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.51.2640 |

[6] | I. Dayan, M. Gitterman and G. H. Weiss, “Stochastic Resonance in Transient Dynamics,” Physical Review A, Vol. 46, No. 2, 1992, pp. 757-761. doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.46.757 |

[7] | S. L. Ginzburg and M. A. Pustovoit, “Noise-Induced Hypersensitivity to Small Time-Dependent Signals,” Physical Review Letters, Vol. 80, No. 22, pp. 4840-4842. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.80.4840 |

[8] | C. R. Doering and J. C. Gadoua, “Resonant Activation over a Fluctuating Barrier,” Physical Review Letters, Vol. 69, No. 16, 1992, pp. 2318-2321. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.69.2318 |

[9] | F. Marchesoni, “Conceptual Design of a Molecular Shuttle,” Physical Letters A, Vol. 237, No. 3, 1998, pp. 126- 130. |

[10] | D. W. Brown, L. J. Bernstein and K. Lindenberg, “Resonant Activation over a Fluctuating Barrier,” Physical Review E, Vol. 54, No. 4, 1996, pp. 3352-3360. doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.54.3352 |

[11] | G. Nicolis and I. Prigogine, “Self-Organization in Non-Equilibrium Systems,” Wiley, New York, 1977. |

[12] | J. E. Fletcher, S. Havlin and G. H. Weiss, “First Passage Time Problems in Time-Dependent Fields,” Journal of Statistical Physics, Vol. 51, No. 1-2, 1988, pp. 215-232. doi:10.1007/BF01015328 |

[13] | P. Reimann and P. Hanggi, “Lecture Notes in Physics,” Springer, Berlin, 1997. |

[14] | C. Zhou and C.-H. Lai, “Robustness of Supersensitivity to Small Signals in Nonlinear Dynamical Systems,” Physical Review E, Vol. 59, No. 6, 1999, pp. R6243-R6246. doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.59.R6243 |

[15] | P. Yung and E. Marchesoni, “Energetics of Stochastic Resonance,” Chaos, Vol. 21, No. 4, 2011, Article ID: 046516. |

[16] | M. Gitterman, “Order and Chaos: Are They Contradicting or Complimentary?” European Journal of Physics, Vol. 23, No. 2, 2002, pp. 119-122. doi:10.1088/0143-0807/23/2/304 |

[17] | R. N. Mantegna and R. Spagnolo, “Noise Enhanced Stability in an Unstable System,” Physical Review Letters, Vol. 76, No. 4, 1996, pp. 563-566. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.76.563 |

[18] | L. Landau and E. Lifshitz, “Mechanics,” Mechanics, Pergamon, 1976. |

[19] | M. Gitterman, “Stabilization of Metastable States,” Physical Review E, Vol. 65, No. 3, 2002, Article ID: 031103. doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.65.031103 |

[20] | M. Gitterman, “Mean-Square Displacement of a Stochastic Oscillator: Linear vs. Quadratic Noise,” Physica A, Vol. 391, No. 11, 2012, pp. 3033-3048. doi:10.1016/j.physa.2012.01.021 |

[21] | P. S. Landa and P. V. E. McClintock, “Vibrational Resonance,” Journal of Physics A, Vol. 33, No. 45, 2000, pp. L433-L438. |

[22] | Y. M. Kang, J.-X. Xu and Y. Xie, “Observing Stochastic Resonance in an Underdamped Bistable Duffing Oscillator by the Method of Moments,” Physical Review E, Vol. 68, No. 3, 2003, Article ID: 036123. doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.68.036123 |

Journals Menu

Contact us

+1 323-425-8868 | |

customer@scirp.org | |

+86 18163351462(WhatsApp) | |

1655362766 | |

Paper Publishing WeChat |

Copyright © 2024 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.