Validating HeartSmart® against the Cardiopulmonary Bypass Machine


Purpose: To assess the utility of HeartSmart?, a new method that uses empirical physiological formulae to estimate hemodynamic variables, in estimating cardiac index during open heart surgery when compared with the cardiopulmonary bypass machine. Methods: This was a prospective, blinded study of patients undergoing elective cardiac bypass surgery. We monitored and compared the flow rates provided by the cardiopulmonary bypass machine (roller pump) with estimates derived from the empirical physiological formulae embedded in the HeartSmart? monitor in 32 patients. Cardiac index values were compared at the start of cardiopulmonary bypass, during re-warming, and at the end of cardiopulmonary bypass. Results: A total of 256 paired sets of measurements were suitable for comparison. The mean of the differences or bias (95% limits of agreement) was 0.09 l/min/m2 and the limits of agreement –0.86 to 1.05 l/min/m2. The mean difference of the sets of 256 measurements was 585.5 l/min/m for the pump and 575.0 l/min/m2 for the empirical physiological formulae—a difference of 5% l/min/m2. The range of flow rates for the pump was 1.2 to 2.85 l/min/m2; for the empirical physiological formulae, the range was 1.2 to 3.0 l/min/m2. Conclusion: The cardiac index estimates derived from the empirical physiological formulae in the HeartSmart? software are in good agreement with pump cardiac output rates. These results suggest that HeartSmart? measurements are sufficiently accurate for assessing hemodynamic variables in many groups of patients.

Share and Cite:

K. Warring-Davies and M. Bland, "Validating HeartSmart® against the Cardiopulmonary Bypass Machine," Surgical Science, Vol. 3 No. 1, 2012, pp. 21-27. doi: 10.4236/ss.2012.31004.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.


[1] C. W. Stetz, R. G. Miller, G. E. Kelly and T. A. Raffin, “Reliability of the Thermodilution Method in the Determination of Cardiac Output in Clinical Practice,” American Review of Respiratory Disease, Vol. 126, No. 6, 1982, pp. 1001-1004.
[2] M. Hadian and M. R. Pinsky, “Evidence-Based Review of the Use of the Pulmonary Artery Catheter: Impact Data and Complications,” Critical Care, Vol. 10, Suppl. 3, 2006, p. S8. doi:10.1186/cc4834
[3] J. C. Berridge, K. Warring-Davies, J. M. Bland and A. C. Quinn, “A New, Minimally Invasive Technique for Measuring Cardiac Index: Clinical Comparison of Continuous Cardiac Dynamic Monitoring and Pulmonary Artery Catheter Methods,” Anaesthesia, Vol. 64, No. 9, 2009, pp. 961-967. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2044.2009.05943.x
[4] K. Warring-Davies and M. Bland, “HeartSmart for Routine Optimization of Blood Flow and Facilitation of Early Goal-Directed Therapy,” Open Access Journal of Clinical Trials, Vol. 2, 2010, pp. 115-123. doi:10.2147/OAJCT.S9843
[5] J. C. Berridge, K. J. Warring-Davies and J. M. Bland, “Author Reply. Graphical Presentation of Data in Non-Invasive Algorithms for Cardiac Output Estimation,” Anaesthesia, Vol. 65, No. 3, 2010, pp. 310-311. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2044.2010.06256_1.x
[6] K. J. Warring-Davies and J. M. Bland, “Author Reply: Prediction and Theory in Cardiac Output Estimates,” Anaesthesia, Vol. 65, No. 7, 2010, pp. 752-753. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2044.2010.06395.x
[7] E. H. Starling, “The Linacre Lecture on the Law of the Heart,” Longmans, Green and Co., London, 1918.
[8] E. H. Starling, “On the Circulatory Changes Associated with Exercise,” Journal of the Royal Army Medical Corps, Vol. 34, 1920, pp. 258-272.
[9] C. A. Opitz, M. Kulke, M. C. Leake, C. Neagoe, H. Hinssen, R. J. Hajjar and W. A. Linke, “Damped Elastic Recoil of the Titin Spring in Myofibrils of Human Myocardium,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, Vol. 100, No. 22, 2003, pp. 12688-12693. doi:10.1073/pnas.2133733100
[10] W. A. Linke and J. M. Fernandez, “Cardiac Titin: Molecular Basis of Elasticity and Cellular Contribution to Elastic and Viscous Stiffness Components in Myocardium,” Journal of Muscle Research and Cell Motility, Vol. 23, No. 5-6, 2002, pp. 483-497. doi:10.1023/A:1023462507254
[11] H. Granzier and S. Labeit, “Cardiac Titin: An Adjustable Multi-Functional Spring,” Journal of Physiology, Vol. 541, Part 2, 2002, pp. 335-342. doi:10.1113/jphysiol.2001.014381
[12] H. Li, W. A. Linke, A. F. Oberhauser, M. Carrion-Vazquez, J. G. Kerkvliet, H. Lu, P. E. Marszalek and J. M. Fernandez, “Reverse Engineering of the Giant Muscle Protein Titin,” Nature, Vol. 418, No. 6901, 2002, pp. 998-1002. doi:10.1038/nature00938
[13] R. Horowits, “The Physiological Role of Titin in Striated Muscle,” Reviews of Physiology, Biochemistry & Pharmacology, Vol. 138, 1999, pp. 57-96. doi:10.1007/BF02346660
[14] M. Kulke, S. Fujita-Becker, E. Rostkova, C. Neagoe, D. Labeit, D. J. Manstein, M. Gautel and W. A. Linke, “Interaction between PEVK-Titin and Actin Filaments: Origin of a Viscous Force Component in Cardiac Myofibrils,” Circulation Research, Vol. 89, No. 10, 2001, pp. 874-881. doi:10.1161/hh2201.099453
[15] L. Tskhovrebova and J. Trinick, “Role of Titin in Vertebrate Striated Muscle,” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, Vol. 357, No. 1418, 2002, pp. 199-206. doi:10.1098/rstb.2001.1028
[16] A. B. Williams, G. M. Decourten-Myers, J. E. Fischer, G. Luo, X. Sun and P. O. Hasselgren, “Sepsis Stimulates Release of Myofilaments in Skeletal Muscle by a Calcium-Dependent Mechanism,” FASEB Journal, Vol. 13, No. 11, 1999, pp. 1435-1443.
[17] C. S. Churcott, C. D. Moyes, B. H. Bressler, K. M. Baldwin and G. F. Tibbits, “Temperature and pH Effects on Ca2+ Sensitivity of Cardiac Myofibrils: A Comparison of Trout with Mammals,” American Journal of Physiology, Vol. 267, No. 1, 1994, pp. R62-R70.
[18] L. A. Critchley and J. A. Critchley, “A Meta-Analysis of Studies Using Bias and Precision Statistics to Compare Cardiac Output Measurement Techniques,” Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing, Vol. 15, No. 2, 1999, pp. 85-91. doi:10.1023/A:1009982611386
[19] J. M. Bland and D. G. Altman, “Agreement between Methods of Measurement with Multiple Observations per Individual,” Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics, Vol. 17, No. 4, 2007, pp. 571-582. doi:10.1080/10543400701329422
[20] J. M. Bland and D. G. Altman, “Measuring Agreement in Method Comparison Studies,” Statistical Methods in Medical Research, Vol. 8, No. 2, 1999, pp. 135-160. doi:10.1191/096228099673819272
[21] E. Rivers, B. Nguyen, S. Havstad, J. Ressler, A. Muzzin, B. Knoblich, E. Peterson and M. Tomlanovich for the Early Goal-Directed Therapy Collaborative Group, “Early Goal-Directed Therapy in the Treatment of Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock,” New England Journal of Medicine, Vol. 345, No. 19, 2001, pp. 1368-1377. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa010307
[22] D. T. Huang, G. Clermont, T. T. Dremsizov, D. C. Angus for the ProCESS Investigators, “Implementation of Early Goal-Directed Therapy for Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock: A Decision Analysis,” Critical Care Medicine, Vol. 35, No. 9, 2007, pp. 2090-2100. doi:10.1097/01.CCM.0000281636.82971.92

Copyright © 2024 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.