Particle Association of Enterococcus and Total Bacteria in the Lower Hudson River Estuary, USA
Elizabeth Suter, Andrew R. Juhl, Gregory D. O’Mullan
DOI: 10.4236/jwarp.2011.310082   PDF    HTML     5,158 Downloads   9,603 Views   Citations


Bacterial particle association has important consequences for water-quality monitoring and modeling. Particle association can change vertical and horizontal transport of bacterial cells, as well as patterns of persistence and production. In this study, the abundance and particle association of total bacteria and the fecal-indicator, Enterococcus, were quantified between June and October 2008 in the lower Hudson River Estuary (HRE). Twelve sites were sampled, including mid-channel, near shore, and tributary habitats, plus a sewage outfall. Total bacterial cell counts averaged 9.2 × 109 ± 6.4 × 109 cell l–1 (1 standard deviation), comparable to previous sampling in the HRE. Unlike earlier studies, bacterial abundance did not change consistently along the north/south estuarine salinity gradient. Enterococcus concentrations were highly variable, but mid-channel stations had significantly lower values than other habitat categories. Counts of total bacteria and Enterococcus were both correlated with turbidity, which was also significantly lower at mid-channel stations. A larger fraction of Enterococci were associated with particles (52.9 ± 20.9%, 1 standard deviation) than in the pool of total bacteria (23.8 ± 15.0%). This high frequency of particle association, relative to total bacteria, could cause Enterococcus to be preferentially retained near input sources because of enhanced deposition to bottom sediments, where they would be available for later resuspension. In turn, retention and resuspension in nearshore environments may explain the observed cross-channel variability of turbidity and Enterococcus. Assessments and predictive models of estuarine water quality may be improved by incorporating cross-channel variability and the effects of particle association on key indicators.

Share and Cite:

E. Suter, A. Juhl and G. O’Mullan, "Particle Association of Enterococcus and Total Bacteria in the Lower Hudson River Estuary, USA," Journal of Water Resource and Protection, Vol. 3 No. 10, 2011, pp. 715-725. doi: 10.4236/jwarp.2011.310082.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.


[1] M. M. Lyons, J. E. Ward, H. Galf, R. E. Hicks, J. M. Drake, F. C. Dobbs, “Theory of Island Biogeography on a Microscopic Scale: Organic Aggregates as Islands for Aquatic Pathogens,” Aquatic Microbial Ecology, Vol. 60, No. 1, 2010, pp. 1-13. doi:10.3354/ame01417
[2] T. Kiorboe and G. A. Jackson, “Marine Snow, Organic Solute Plumes, and Optimal Chemosensory Behavior of Bacteria,” Limnology and Oceanography, Vol. 46, No. 6, 2001, pp. 1309-1318. doi:10.4319/lo.2001.46.6.1309
[3] A. L. Shanks and M. L. Reeder, “Reducing Microzones and Sulfide Production in Marine Snow,” Marine Ecology Progress Series, Vol. 96, No. 1, 1993, pp. 43-47. doi:10.3354/meps096043
[4] E. F. DeLong, D. G. Franks, and A. L. Alldredge, “Phylogenetic Diversity of Aggregate-Attached vs. Free-Living Marine Bacterial Assemblages,” Limnology and Oceanography, Vol. 38, No. 5, 1993, pp. 924-934. doi:10.4319/lo.1993.38.5.0924
[5] K. D. Bidle and M. Fletcher, “Comparison of Free-Living and Particle-Associated Bacterial Communities in the Chesapeake Bay by Stable Low-Molecular-Weight RNA Analysis,” Applied and Environmental Microbiology, Vol. 61, No. 3, 1995, pp. 944-952.
[6] B. C. Crump, J. A. Baross and C. A. Simenstad, “Dominance of Particle-Attached Bacteria in the Columbia River Estuary, USA,” Aquatic Microbial Ecology, Vol. 14, No. 1, 1998 pp. 7-18. doi:10.3354/ame014007
[7] J. T. Hollibaugh and P. S. Wong, “Microbial Processes in the San Francisco Bay Estuarine Turbidity Maximum,” Estuaries Vol. 22, No. 4, 1999, pp. 848-862. doi:10.2307/1353066
[8] C. M. Davies and H. J. Bavor, “The Fate of Stormwater-Associated Bacteria in Constructed Wetland and Water Pollution Control Pond Systems,” Journal of Applied Microbiology, Vol. 89, No. 2, 2000, pp. 349-360. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2672.2000.01118.x
[9] O. Hess-Erga and K. Attramadal, “Biotic and Abiotic Particles Protect Marine Heterotrophic Bacteria during UV and Ozone Disinfection,” Aquatic Biology, Vol. 4, No. 2, 2008, pp. 147-154. doi:10.3354/ab00105
[10] H. W. Ducklow, D. L. Kirchman, and G. T. Rowe, “Production and Vertical Flux of Attached Bacteria in the Hudson River Plume of the New York Bight as Studied with Floating Sediment Traps,” Applied and Environmental Microbiology, Vol. 43, No. 4, 1982, pp. 769-776.
[11] T. Garcia-Armisen and P. Servais, “Partitioning and Fate of Particle-Associated E. coli in River Waters, Water Environment Research, Vol. 81, No. 1, 2009, pp. 21-28.
[12] C. M Lee, T. Y. Lin, C. C. Lin, G. A. Kohbodi, A. Bhattl, R. Lee and J. A. Jay, “Persistence of Fecal Indicator Bacteria in Santa Monica Bay Beach Sediments,” Water Research, Vol. 40, No. 14, 2006, pp. 2593-2602. doi:10.1016/j.watres.2006.04.032
[13] A. Hartz, M. Cuvelier, K. Nowosielski, T. Bonilla, M. Green, N. Esiobu, D. McCorquodale, and A. Rogerson, “Survival Potential of Escherichia coli and Enterococci in Subtropical Beach Sand: Implications for Water Quality Managers,” Journal of Environmental Quality, Vol. 37, No. 3, 2008, pp. 898-905. doi:10.2134/jeq2007.0312
[14] J. S. Fries, G. W. Characklis and R. T. Noble “Sediment-Water Exchange of Vibrio sp. and Fecal Indicator Bacteria: Implications for Persistence and Transport in the Neuse River Estuary, North Carolina, USA, Water Research, Vol. 42, No. 4-5, 2008, pp. 941-950. doi:10.1016/j.watres.2007.09.006
[15] D.A. T. Phillip, P. Antoine, V. Cooper, L. Francis, E. Mangal, N. Seepersad, I. Singh and A. Ramsubhag, “Impact of Recreation on Recreational Water Quality of a Small Tropical Stream,” Journal of Environmental Moni- toring, Vol. 11, 2009, pp. 1192-1198. doi:10.1039/b817452k
[16] R. Jamieson, R. Gordon, D. Joy and H. Lee, “Assessing Microbial Pollution of Rural Surface Waters - A Review of Current Watershed Scale Modeling Approaches, Agricultural Water Management, Vol. 70, No. 1, 2004, pp. 1-17. doi:10.1016/j.agwat.2004.05.006
[17] G. W. Characklis, M. J. Dilts, O. D. Simmons, C. A. Likirdopulos, L. A. H. Krometis and M. D. Sobsey, “Microbial Partitioning to Settleable Particles in Stormwater”, Water Research, Vol. 39, No. 9, 2005, pp. 1773-1782. doi:10.1016/j.watres.2005.03.004
[18] L. Liu, M. Phanikumar, S. Molloy, R. Whitman, D. Shively, M. B. Nevers, D. Schwab and J. Rose, “Modeling the Transport and Inactivation of E. coli and Enterococci in the Near-Shore Region of Lake Michigan,” Environmental Science and Technology, Vol. 40, No. 16, 2006, pp. 5022-5028. doi:10.1021/es060438k
[19] J-W. Kim, Y. A. Pachepsky, D. R. Shelton and C. Coppock, “Effect of Streambed Bacteria Release on E. coli Concentrations: Monitoring and Modeling with the Modified SWAT,” Ecological Modeling, Vol. 221, 2010, pp. 1592-1604. doi:10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2010.03.005
[20] T. M. Brosnan, A. Stoddard and L. J. Hetling, “Hudson River Sewage Inputs and Impacts: Past and Present,” In: J. S. Levinton and J. R. Waldman, Ed., The Hudson River Estuary, Cambridge University Press, New York, 2006, pp. 335-348. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511550539.025
[21] NYC DEP, “2008 New York Harbor Water Quality Report,” New York City Department of Environmental Protection. New York, 2008,
[22] US EPA, “Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Bacteria,” U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Water, Washington DC, EPA 440/5-84-002, 24, 1986.
[23] UNESCO, “Protocols for the Joint Global Ocean Flux Study (JGOFS) Core Measurements,” IOC Manuals and Guides, No. 29. UNESCO, Paris, 1994.
[24] N. Buesing and M. O. Gessner, “Comparison of Detachment Procedures for Direct Counts of Bacteria Associated with Sediment Particles, Plant Litter and Epiphytic Biofilms,” Aquatic Microbial Ecology, Vol. 27, No. 1, 2002, pp. 29-36. doi:10.3354/ame027029
[25] M. Lunau, A. Lemke, K. Walther, W. Martens-Habbena and M. Simon, “An Improved Method for Counting Bacteria from Sediments and Turbid Environments by Epifluorescence Microscopy,” Environmental Microbiology, Vol. 7, No. 7, 2005, pp. 961-968. doi:10.1111/j.1462-2920.2005.00767.x
[26] W. B. Yoon and R. A. Rosson, “Improved Method of Enumeration of Attached Bacteria for Study of Fluctuation in the Abundance of Attached and Free-Living Bacteria in Response to Diel Variation in Seawater Turbidity, Applied and Environmental Microbiology, Vol. 56, No. 3, 1990, pp. 595-600.
[27] R. T. Noble and J. A. Fuhrman, “Use of SYBR Green I for Rapid Epifluorescence Counts of Marine Viruses and Bacteria,” Aquatic Microbial Ecology Vol. 14, No. 2, 1998, pp. 113-118. doi:10.3354/ame014113
[28] H. Bokuniewicz, “Sedimentary Processes in the Hudson River Estuary”, In: J. S. Levinton and J. R. Waldman, Eds., The Hudson River Estuary, Cambridge University Press, New York, 2006, pp. 39-50. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511550539.006
[29] H. W. Ducklow and F. Shiah, “Estuarine Bacterial Production,” In: T. Ford, Ed., Aquatic Microbiology: An Ecological Approach, Blackwell, London, 1993, pp. 261- 284.
[30] S. E. G. Findlay, “Bacterial Abundance, Growth and Metabolism in the Tidal Freshwater Hudson River,” In: J. S. Levinton and J. R. Waldman, Ed., The Hudson River Estuary, Cambridge University Press, New York, 2006, pp. 99-106. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511550539.010
[31] G. T. Taylor, J. Way and M. I. Scranton, “Planktonic Carbon Cycling and Transport in Surface Waters of the Highly Urbanized Hudson River Estuary,” Limnology and Oceanography, Vol. 48, No. 5, 2003, pp. 1779-1795. doi:10.4319/lo.2003.48.5.1779
[32] S. A. Sanudo-Wilhelmy and G. T. Taylor, (1999) “Bacterioplankton Dynamics and Organic Carbon Partitioning in the Lower Hudson River Estuary,” Marine Ecology Progress Series, Vol. 182, 1999, pp. 17-27. doi:10.3354/meps182017
[33] H. W. Ducklow, and D. L. Kirchman, “Bacterial Dynamics and Distribution during a Spring Diatom Bloom in the Hudson River Plume, USA,” Journal of Plankton Research Vol. 5, No. 3, 1983, pp. 333-355. doi:10.1093/plankt/5.3.333
[34] B. C. Crump and J. A. Baross, “Particle-Attached Bacteria and Heterotrophic Plankton Associated with the Columbia River Estuarine Turbidity Maxima,” Marine Ecology Progress Series, Vol. 138, No. 1-3, 1996, pp. 265-273. doi:10.3354/meps138265

Copyright © 2023 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.