Avian Community Composition in Response to High Explosive Testing Operations at Los Alamos National Laboratory in Northern New Mexico

DOI: 10.4236/jep.2015.612125   PDF   HTML   XML   4,447 Downloads   4,822 Views   Citations


Breeding bird abundance, species richness, evenness, diversity, composition, productivity, and survivorship were determined near a high-explosive detonation site at Los Alamos National Laboratory, New Mexico, USA, during pre-operation (1997-1999) and operation (2000-2014) periods. The operation periods consisted of detonations (<23 kg in yield and <3 per breeding season) in open air (2000-2002), within foam containment (2003-2006) and within steel vessel containment (2007-2014) systems; the latter two were employed to reduce noise and dispersal of high-explosives residues. A total of 2952 bird captures, representing 80 species, was recorded during 18 years of mist net operations using the Monitoring Avian Productivity and Survivorship protocol. Individuals captured were identified to species, aged, sexed, and banded during May through August of each year. There were no significant differences (p > 0.05) in mean avian abundance and species evenness in any of the operation periods as compared with the pre-operation period. Species richness and diversity were significantly higher (p < 0.05) during the vessel containment period (2007-2014) than the pre-operation period. The time period of this study coincided with a wildfire (2000), a bark beetle infestation (2002), and two periods of drought (Nov 1999-Mar 2004 and Dec 2005-Dec 2014) that affected the study area. Analysis of aerial photos determined that the average percent canopy cover of mature ponderosa pines (Pinus ponderosa) within 100 feet of mist net sites declined from 12% to 3% between 1991 and 2014 and the percent cover of shrubs slightly increased. The percent similarity in presence/abundance between the pre-operation avian community and avian community during the open air, foam containment, and vessel containment periods were 59%, 63% and 68% respectively. Two bird species associated with large trees became less common over the study period (capture rate dropped below 2.0 adults per 600 net-hours relative to the pre-operations period), and four bird species associated with edge and scrub habitats became more common over the study period (capture rate increased to more than 2.0 adults per 600 net-hours relative to the pre-operations period). Bird demographics (productivity and survival) were not negatively affected by the initiation of firing site operations. The increase in diversity and the change in bird species composition over time were probably related to the change in vegetation from a woodland to a more open woodland/shrub environment.

Share and Cite:

Keller, D. , Fresquez, P. , Hansen, L. and Kaschube, D. (2015) Avian Community Composition in Response to High Explosive Testing Operations at Los Alamos National Laboratory in Northern New Mexico. Journal of Environmental Protection, 6, 1442-1453. doi: 10.4236/jep.2015.612125.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.


[1] Morrison, M.J. (1986) Bird Populations as Indicators of Environmental Change. Current Ornitholog, 3, 429-451.
[2] Canterbury, G.E. and Blockstein, D.E. (1997) Local Changes in a Breeding Bird Community Following Forest Disturbance. Journal of Field Ornithology, 68, 537-546.
[3] Hutto, R.L. (1998) Using Landbirds as an Indicator Species Group. In: Marzluff, J.M. and Sallabanks, R. Eds., Avian Conservation: Research and Management, Island Press, Washington DC, 75-92.
[4] Reijnen, R., Foppen, R., Terbraaak, C. and Thissen, J. (1995) The Effects of Car Traffic on Breeding Bird Populations in Woodland 3. Reduction of Density in Relation to the Proximity of Main Roads. Journal of Applied Ecology, 32, 187-202.
[5] Parris, K.M. and Schneider, S. (2008) Impacts of Traffic Noise and Traffic Volume on Birds of Roadside Habitats. Ecology and Society, 14, 29.
[6] Francis, C.C., Ortega, C.P. and Cruz, A. (2009) Noise Pollution Changes Avian Communities and Species Interactions. Current Biology, 19, 1415-1419.
[7] McClure, C.J.W., Ware, H.E., Carlisle, J., Kaltenecker, G. and Barber, J.R. (2013) An Experimental Investigation into the Effects of Traffic Noise on Distributions of Birds: Avoiding the Phantom Road. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 280.
[8] Proppe, D.S., Sturdy, C.B. and Cassady St. Clair., C. (2013) Anthropongenic Noise Decreases Urban Songbird Diversity and May Contribute to Homogenization. Global Change Biology, 19, 1075-1084.
[9] Ambuel, B. and Temple, S.A. (1983) Area-Dependent Changes in the Bird Communities and Vegetation of Southern Wisconsin Forests. Ecology, 64, 1057-1068.
[10] Patten, M.A. and Rotenberry, J.T. (1998) Post-disturbance Changes in a Desert Breeding Bird Community. Journal of Field Ornithology, 69, 614-625.
[11] Brawn, J.D., Robinson, S.K. and Thompson III, F.R. (2001) The Role of Disturbance in the Ecology and Conservation of Birds. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 32, 251-276.
[12] De Sante, D.F., Burton, K.M., Velez, P. and Froehlich, D. (2002) Maps Manual 2002, Protocol Instructions for the Establishment and Operation of Constant-Effort Bird-Banding Stations as Part of the Monitoring Avian Productivity and Survivorship (MAPS) Program. The Institute for Bird Populations, Point Reyes Bird Observatory Bolinas, CA.
[13] DeSante, D.F., Saracco, J.F., O’Grady, D.R., Burton, K.M. and Walker, B.L. (2004) Some Methodological Considerations of the Monitoring Avian Productivity and Survivorship Program. Studies in Avian Biology, 29, 28-45.
[14] Robinson, R.A., Julliard, R. and Saracco, J.F. (2009) Constant Effort: Monitoring Avian Population Change through Standardized Ringing. Ringing and Migration, 24, 199-204.
[15] DeSante, D.F. and Kaschube, D.R. (2009) The Monitoring Avian Productivity and Survivorship (MAPS) Program 2004, 2005, and 2006 Report. Bird Populations, 9, 86-169.
[16] USDOE (1995) Final Environmental Impact Statement: Dual-Axis Radiographic Hydrodynamic Test Facility. United States Department of Energy Report USDOE/EIS-0228.
[17] Duran, B. (2008) Environmental Assessment of Foam Mitigation and Vessel Contained Shots. Los Alamos National Laboratory Report LA-UR-08-2289, Los Alamos, NM.
[18] Nyhan, J.W., Fresquez, P.R., Haarmann, T., Bennett, K., Haagenstad, T., Keller, K. and Hinojosa, H. (2001) Baseline Concentrations of Radionuclides and Trace Elements in Soils, Sediments, Vegetation, Small Mammals, Birds, and Bees around the DARHT Facility: Construction Phase (1996 through 1999). Los Alamos National Laboratory Report LA-13808-MS, Los Alamos, NM.
[19] Fresquez, P.R., McNaughton, M., Hansen, L., Hathcock, C., Gaukler, S. and Keller, D. (2015) Ecosystem Health. In: Annual Site Environmental Report 2014, Los Alamos National Laboratory Report LA-UR-15-27513, Los Alamos, NM, pp. 7-1 to 7-46.
[20] Bub, H. (1996) Bird Trapping and Bird Banding: A Handbook for Trapping Methods All over the World. Cornell University Press, Ithaca.
[21] Herrick, J.E., Van Zee, J.W., Havstad, K.M., Burkett, L.M. and Whitford, W.G. (2005) Monitoring Manual for Grassland, Shrubland and Savanna Ecosystems, Volume I: Quick Start. USDA-ARS Jornada Experimental Range, PO Box 30003, MSC 3JER, NMSU, Las Cruces, New Mexico 88003-8003.
[22] Pyle, P. (1997) Identification Guide to North American Passerines. Slate Creek Press, Bolinas.
[23] Zar, J.H. (1974) Biostatistical Analysis. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs.
[24] Mueller-Dombois and Ellenberg, H. (1974) Aims and Methods of Vegetation Ecology. John Wiley & Sons, New York.
[25] Peach, W.J., Buckland, S.T. and Baillie, S.R. (1996) The Use of Constant Effort Mist-Netting to Measure Between-Year Changes in the Abundance and Productivity of Common Passerines. Bird Study, 43, 142-156.
[26] White, G.C. (1983) Numerical Estimation of Survival Rates from Band Recovery and Biotelemetry Data. Journal of Wildlife Management, 47,716-728.
[27] Hines, J.E., Kendall, W.L. and Nichols, J.D. (2003) On the Use of the Robust Design with Transient Capture-Recapture Models. The Auk, 120, 1151-1158.
[28] Pradel, R.J., Hines, J.D., Lebreton and Nichols, J.D. (1997) Estimating Survival Probabilities and Proportions of Transients’ Using Capture-Recapture Data. International Biometric Society, 53, 60-72.
[29] Nott, M.P., DeSante, D.F., Siegel, R.B. and Pyle, P. (2002) Influences of the El Niño/Southern Oscillation and the North Atlantic Oscillation on Avian Productivity in Forests of the Pacific Northwest of North America. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 11, 333-342.
[30] Kraig, D., Ryti, R., Katzman, D., Buhl, T., Gallaher, B. and Fresquez, P. (2001) Radiological and Nonradiological Effects after the Cerro Grande Fire. Los Alamos National Laboratory Report LA-UR-01-6868, Los Alamos, NM.
[31] LANL (2004) Compliance Summary. In: Environmental Surveillance at Los Alamos during 2002, Los Alamos National Laboratory Report LA-14085-ENV, Los Alamos, NM, 9-38.
[32] South Central Climate Science Center (2013) Drought History for the Northern Mountains of New Mexico. Norman, Oklahoma, 31 August 2015.
[33] NOAA (2015) Historical Palmer Drought Indices. 31 August 2015.
[34] Allen, C.D. and Breshears, D.D. (1998) Drought-Induced Shift of a Forest-Woodland Ecotone: Rapid Landscape Response to Climate Variation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 95, 14839-14842.
[35] Breshears, D.D., Cobb, N.S., Rich, P.M, Price, K.P., Allen, C.D., Balice, R.G., Romme, W.H., Kastens, J.H., Floyd, M.L., Belnap, J., Anderson, J.J., Myers, O.B. and Meyer, C.W. (2005) Regional Vegetation Die-Off in Response to Global-Change-Type Drought. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 102, 15144-15148.
[36] Goeking, S.A., Shaw, J.D., Witt, C., Thompson, M.T., Werstak Jr, C.E., Amacher, M.C., Stuever, M., Morgan, T.A., Sorenson, C.B., Hayes, S.W. and McIver, C.P. (2014) New Mexico’s Forest Resources, 2008-2012. US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station Resource Bulletin RMRS-RB-18, Fort Collins, CO.
[37] USFWS (2008) Birds of Conservation Concern. United States Department of Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service, Division of Migratory Bird Management, Arlington, Virginia, 85 p.
[38] Wells, J.V. (2007) Birder’s Conservation Handbook: 100 North American Birds at Risk. Princeton University Press, Princeton.
[39] Cornell Lab of Ornithology (2015) All about Birds Website. October 2015.
[40] Hutto, R.L. (1995) Composition of Bird Communities Following Stand-Replacement Fires in the Northern Rocky Mountain (USA) Conifer Forests. Conservation Biology, 9, 1041-1058.
[41] Kotliar, N.B., Heil, S.J., Hutto, R.L., Saab, V.A., Melcher, C.P. and McFadzen, M.E. (2002) Effects of Fire and Post-Fire Salvage Logging on Avian Communities in Conifer-Dominated Forest of the Western United States. Studies in Avian Biology, 25, 49-64.
[42] Smucker, K.M., Hutto, R.L. and Steele, B.M. (2005) Changes in Bird Abundance after Wildfire: Importance of Fire Severity and Time since Fire. Ecological Applications, 15, 1535-1549.
[43] DeSante, D.F., Burton, K.M., Saracco, J.F. and Walker, B.L. (1995) Productivity Indices and Survival-Rate Estimates from MAPS, a Continent-Wide Programme of Constant-Effort Mist-Netting in North America. Journal of Applied Statistics, 22, 935-948.

comments powered by Disqus

Copyright © 2020 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.