Environmental Approaches during Planning and Construction Stages of Hydropower Projects in Mexico

María Antonieta Gómez-Balandra; María del Pilar Saldaña-Fabela; Rosa Dina Llerandi-Juárez

doi:10.4236/jep.2015.610106

Home > Journals > Earth & Environmental Sciences > JEP

Journal of Environmental Protection > Vol.6 No.10, October 2015

Environmental Approaches during Planning and Construction Stages of Hydropower Projects in Mexico ()

María Antonieta Gómez-Balandra^1*, María del Pilar Saldaña-Fabela¹, Rosa Dina Llerandi-Juárez²

¹Hydrobiology and Environmental Assessment Department, Mexican Institute of Water Technology, Morelos, Mexico.
²Hydrobiology and Environmental Assessment Department, Mexican Institute of Water Technology, Morelos, Mexico.

DOI: 10.4236/jep.2015.610106 PDF HTML XML 3,844 Downloads 4,532 Views Citations

Abstract

During the Environmental Impact Assessment procedure (EIA) for hydropower projects, apart from the compliance with environmental standards and regulations, important environmental and ecosystem changes are foreseen from planning and construction stages. In Mexico, the EIA and environmental standards are being systematically applied and fulfilled at planning and construction stages for hydropower projects. These are mainly related to control air emissions, solid and hazardous wastes, water discharges and deal with protected species. In addition, due to land use changes, forestry compensation procedures have already been established. To comply with project approval conditions, an Environmental Management Plan (EMP) is carried out during construction; it includes mitigation measures, standards, regulations and approval conditions resulting of project review and in some cases requests from the public audience. Monitoring is carried out in the area of influence that is in the works and where it is expected that natural processes are modified. However, indicators to track these changes are minimal. This paper analyzes the regulatory and organizational frameworks to address environmental management during the planning and construction of hydropower facilities in Mexico and gives recommendations to expand the scope of the supervision and management of ecosystem changes.

Keywords

Environment, Hydro, Project, Requirement, Mexico

Share and Cite:

Gómez-Balandra, M. , Saldaña-Fabela, M. and Llerandi-Juárez, R. (2015) Environmental Approaches during Planning and Construction Stages of Hydropower Projects in Mexico. Journal of Environmental Protection, 6, 1186-1195. doi: 10.4236/jep.2015.610106.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

[1]	Frey, G. and Linke, D. (2002) Hydropower as a Renewable and Sustainable Energy Resource Meeting Global Energy Challenges in a Reasonable Way. Energy Policy, 30, 1261-1265. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0301-4215(02)00086-1
[2]	Koch, F.H. (2002) Hydropower—The Politics of Water and Energy: Introduction and Overview. Energy Policy, 30, 1207-1213. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0301-4215(02)00081-2
[3]	Tilt, B., Braun, Y. and He, D. (2009) Social Impacts of Large Dam Projects: A Comparison of International Case Studies and Implications for Best Practice. Journal of Environmental Management, 90, S249-S257. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2008.07.030
[4]	Environment Agency (2009) Good Practice Guidelines to the Environment Agency Hydropower Handbook. The Environmental Assessment of Proposed Low Head Hydropower Developments. Bristol.
[5]	International Hydropower Association (IHA) (2010) Hydropower Sustainability Assessment Protocol. London.
[6]	Pietrosemoli, L. and Rodríguez Monroy, C. (2013) The Impact of Sustainable Construction and Knowledge Management on Sustainability Goals. A Review of the Venezuelan Renewable Energy Sector. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 27, 683-691.
[7]	Ledec, G. and Quintero, J.D. (2003) Good Dams and Bad Dams: Environmental Criteria for Site Selection of Hydroelectric Projects.
[8]	égré, D. and Senécal, P. (2003) Social Impact Assessments of Large Dams throughout the World: Lessons Learned over Two Decades. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 21, 215-224. http://dx.doi.org/10.3152/147154603781766310
[9]	Barajas, N., Calahorra, O. and Opperman, J. (2012) Pursuing Sustainable Hydropower in the Coatzacoalcos River Basin, Mexico. Energy Future: The Role of Impact Assessment, 1-5.
[10]	Hartmann, J., Harrison, D., Opperman, J. and Gill, R. (2013) The Next Frontier of Hydropower Sustainability: Planning at the System Scale—Report Prepared for the Inter-American Development Bank (IDB) by The Nature Conservancy.
[11]	Diario Oficial de la Federación (DOF) (2012) Reglamento de la Ley General del Equilibrio Ecológico y la Protección al Ambiente en Materia de Evaluación del Impacto Ambiental. Cámara de Diputados del H. Congreso de la Unión, México D.F., 1-27.
[12]	SEMARNAT (2013) Guía para la elaboración de la manifestación del impacto ambiental modalidad regional. Ley General del Equilibrio Ecológico y la Protección al Ambiente, México D.F.
[13]	Wayakone, S. (2012) Evaluation of the Environmental Impacts Assessment (EIA) System in Lao PDR. Journal of Environmental Protection, 3, 1655-1670. http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/jep.2012.312182
[14]	Diario Oficial de la Federación (DOF) (2005) Reglamento de La Ley General de Desarrollo Forestal Sustentable. Artículo 121, reglamento publicado en el Diario Oficial de la Federación el 21 de febrero de 2005. Cámara de Diputados del H. Congreso de la Unión, México D.F., 44.
[15]	MoEST (2006) A Guide to Environmental Management Plan of Hydropower Projects. Ministry of Environment, Science and Technology, Kathmandu.
[16]	Williams, B.K. and Brown, E.D. (2014) Adaptive Management: From More Talk to Real Action. Environmental Management, 53, 465-479. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00267-013-0205-7
[17]	Instituto Costarricense de Energía-Inter-American Development Bank (ICE-IDB) (2012) Proyectro Hidroeléctrico Reventazón: Estudios ambientales adicionales. Parte H: Efectos acumulativos.
[18]	NOM-120-SEMARNAT-2011 (2011) Norma Oficial Mexicana. Que establece las especificaciones de protección ambiental para las actividades de exploración minera directa, en zonas agrícolas, ganaderas o eriales y en zonas con climas secos y templados. 5-6.
[19]	Gomez-Balandra, M.A., Saldaña-Fabela, M.P., Lecanda, C. and Gutierrez, E. (2006) Advances in Integrative Approaches for Dams’ Viability in Mexico. In: Berga, L., Buil, J., Bofil, E., De Cea, J., García Pérez, J., Mañueco, G., Polimon, G., Soriano, A. and Yagüe, J., Eds., Dams and Reservoirs, Societies and Environment in the 21st Century, 1st Edition, Taylor & Francis, London, 1187-1194.
[20]	NOM-011-CONAGUA-2000 (2002) Norma Oficial Mexicana. Conservación del recurso agua. Que establece las especificaciones y el método para disponibilidad media anual de las aguas nacionales. DOF 17 de Abril de 2002, México D.F., 20.
[21]	SEMARNAT (2014) Sistema de Información Geográfica para la Evaluación del Impacto Ambiental. [Online]. http://www.semarnat.gob.mx/sigeia
[22]	Wieringa, M. and Morton, A. (1996) Hydropower, Adaptive Management, and Biodiversity. Environmental Management, 20, 831-840. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01205963
[23]	NMX-AA-159-SCFI-2012 (2012) Norma Mexicana. Que establece el procedimiento para la determinación del caudal ecológico en cuencas hidrológicas. DOF 20 de Septiembre de 2012, México D.F., 123.
[24]	MacDonald, L.H. (2000) Evaluating and Managing Cumulative Effects: Process and Constraints. Environmental Management, 26, 299-315. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s002670010088
[25]	Bratrich, C., Truffer, B., Jorde, K., Markard, J., Meier, W., Peter, A., Schneider, M. and Wehrli, B. (2004) Green Hydropower: A New Assessment Procedure for River Management. River Research and Applications, 20, 865-882. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/rra.788
[26]	Richter, B.D., Postel, S., Revenga, C., Lehner, B. and Churchill, A. (2010) Lost in Development’s Shadow: The Downstream Human Consequences of Dams. Water Alternatives, 3, 14-42.
[27]	Vörösmarty, C.J., McIntyre, P.B., Gessner, M.O., Dudgeon, D., Prusevich, A., Green, P., Glidden, S., Bunn, S.E., Sullivan, C.A., Liermann, C.R. and Davies, P.M. (2010) Global Threats to Human Water Security and River Biodiversity. Nature, 467, 555-561. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature09440
[28]	Kibler, K.M. and Tullos, D.D. (2013) Cumulative Biophysical Impact of Small and Large Hydropower Development in Nu River, China. Water Resources Research, 49, 3104-3118. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/wrcr.20243
[29]	Pearsall, S.H., McCrodden, B.J. and Townsend, P.A. (2005) Adaptive Management of Flows in the Lower Roanoke River, North Carolina, USA. Environmental Management, 35, 353-367. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00267-003-0255-3
[30]	Arthington, A.H., Naiman, R.J., McClain, M.E. and Nilsson, C. (2010) Preserving the Biodiversity and Ecological Services of Rivers: New Challenges and Research Opportunities. Freshwater Biology, 55, 1-16. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2427.2009.02340.x
[31]	Brismar, A. (2004) Attention to Impact Pathways in EISs of Large Dam Projects. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 24, 59-87. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0195-9255(03)00162-8
[32]	Wang, Q.R. (2013) Hydro Development-Induced Environmental Impact on River Ecosystem. Open Journal of Social Sciences, 1, 1-4. http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/jss.2013.15001