Application of the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) to Multi-Criteria Analysis for Contractor Selection

Mohammed Balubaid; Rami Alamoudi

doi:10.4236/ajibm.2015.59058

Home > Journals > Business & Economics > AJIBM

AJIBM> Vol.5 No.9, September 2015

Share This Article:

Open Access

Application of the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) to Multi-Criteria Analysis for Contractor Selection

Abstract Full-Text HTML XML

Download as PDF (Size:297KB) PP. 581-589

DOI: 10.4236/ajibm.2015.59058 3,686 Downloads 5,329 Views Citations

Author(s) Leave a comment

Mohammed Balubaid, Rami Alamoudi

Affiliation(s)

Department of Industrial Engineering, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.

ABSTRACT

One of the key activities of any client is contractor selection. Without a suitable and precise method for selecting the best contractor, the completion of a project will likely be affected. In this study, we examine the use of the analytical hierarchy process (AHP) as a decision-support model for contractor selection. This model can assist project management teams in identifying contractors who are most likely to deliver satisfactory outcomes in a selection process that is not based simply on the lowest bid. In this study, an AHP-based model is tested using a hypothetical scenario in which candidate contractors are evaluated. Six criteria for the primary objective are evaluated. The criteria used for contractor selection in the model are identified, and the significance of each criterion is determined using a questionnaire. Comparisons are made by ranking the aggregate score of each candidate based on each criterion, and the candidate with the highest score is deemed the best. This study contributes to the construction sector in two ways: first, it extends the understanding of selection criteria to include degrees of importance, and second, it implements a multi-criteria AHP approach, which is a new method for analyzing and selecting the best contractor.

KEYWORDS

Analytical Hierarchy Process, Multi-Criteria Decision-Making, Contractor Selection

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Cite this paper

Balubaid, M. and Alamoudi, R. (2015) Application of the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) to Multi-Criteria Analysis for Contractor Selection. American Journal of Industrial and Business Management, 5, 581-589. doi: 10.4236/ajibm.2015.59058.

References

[1]	Wang, W.C., Yu, W.D., Yang, I.T., Lin, C.C., Lee, M.T. and Cheng, Y.Y. (2013) Applying the AHP to Support the Best-Value Contractor Selection—Lessons Learned from Two Case Studies in Taiwan. Journal of Civil Engineering and Management, 19, 24-36. http://dx.doi.org/10.3846/13923730.2012.734851

[2]	Hatush, Z. and Skitmore, M. (1998) Contractor Selection Using Multicriteria Utility Theory: An Additive Model. Building and Environment, 33, 105-115. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0360-1323(97)00016-4

[3]	Pongpeng, J. and Liston, J. (2003) TenSeM: A Multicriteria and Multidecision-Makers’ Model in Tender Evaluation. Construction Management and Economics, 21, 21-30. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0144619032000065090

[4]	Singh, D. and Tiong, R.L.K. (2005) A Fuzzy Decision Framework for Contractor Selection. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management ASCE, 131, 62-70. http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2005)131:1(62)

[5]	Li, Y., Nie, X. and Chen, S. (2007) Fuzzy Approach to Prequalifying Construction Contractors. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management ASCE, 133, 40-49. http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2007)133:1(40)

[6]	Alarcón, L.F. and Mourgues, C. (2002) Performance Modeling for Contractor Selection. Journal of Management in Engineering ASCE, 18, 52-60. http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0742-597X(2002)18:2(52)

[7]	Saaty, T.L. (1978) Exploring the Interface between Hierarchies, Multiple Objectives and the Fuzzy Sets. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 1, 57-68. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0165-0114(78)90032-5

[8]	Saaty, T.L. (1980) The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation. McGraw-Hill, NY. 287 p.

[9]	Skibniewski, M.J. and Chao, L. (1992) Evaluation of Advanced Construction Technology with AHP Method. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, ASCE, 118, 577-593. http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(1992)118:3(577)

[10]	Fong, P.S. and Choi, S.K. (2000) Final Contractor Selection Using the Analytical Hierarchy Process. Construction Management and Economics, 18, 547-557. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/014461900407356

[11]	Al-Harbi, K.M.A. (2001) Application of the AHP in Project Management. International Journal of Project Management, 19, 19-27. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0263-7863(99)00038-1

[12]	Anagnostopoulos, K.P. and Vavatsikos, A.P. (2006) An AHP Model for Construction Contractor Prequalification, Operational Research. Anais: An International Journal, 6, 333-346.

[13]	Padhi, S.S. and Mohapatra, P.K.J. (2009) Contractor Selection in Government Procurement Auctions: A Case Study, European. Journal of Industrial Engineering, 3, 170-186. http://dx.doi.org/10.1504/EJIE.2009.023604

[14]	Dobi, K., Gugic, J. and Kancijan, D. (2010) AHP as a Decision Support Tool in the Multicriteria Evaluation of Bids in Public Procurement. The 32nd International Conference on Information Technology Interfaces (ITI 2010), 21-24 June 2010, Catvat/Dubrovnik, 447-452.