What Is the Accuracy of Shoulder Range of Motion Measurements on Physical Exam?

Yousef Shishani, Janice Flocken, Reuben Gobezie

Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, The Cleveland Shoulder Institute, Beachwood, USA.

DOI: 10.4236/ojo.2015.59036                

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to investigate a new method for measuring shoulder range of motion (ROM) in an orthopedic practice utilizing a smartphone application to improve accuracy from physical exam typically used in research. Our aim is to evaluate the application, Physio2Go (P2G), which uses a virtual goniometer, assessing validity by comparing its measurements to those taken by a universal goniometer (UG). Two observers of varying clinical experience, a research assistant and research fellow, compared measurements. Statistically, we used the intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC), standard error of measurement (SEM), and the Pearson correlation coefficient (PCC). Following validation we tested P2G in symptomatic postoperative shoulder patients measuring forward flexion (FF) and external rotation (ER). We compared P2G measurements to visual estimation (VE) done by a fellowship trained orthopedic surgeon. Statistically we used ICC, Bland- Altman plots with 95% limits of agreement (LOA), and scatter plots. We examined the impact of the application using Welch’s t-test comparing pre-to-postoperative ROM improvements using the values obtained by P2G and VE. We found high intra-rater reliability of P2G for both observers, substantial correlation between UG and P2G measurements, highly correlated inter-observer reliability for UG and P2G, and statistically significant PCC values (p < 0.05). As expected, ROM measurements of symptomatic patients comparing P2G and VE measurements demonstrated lower correlation. Bland-Altman plots demonstrated wide confidence intervals; scatterplots and histograms confirmed low agreement among measurement methods. Clinical application demonstrated varying statistical significance depending on whether measurements were done by P2G or VE. Our study found that P2G provided superior reliability compared to the customary physical exam routinely used for orthopedic research. The value of using this application instead of a UG is the ease of use and the ability for any member of the healthcare team, regardless of clinical experience to be able to produce reliable and valid measurements.

Keywords

Shoulder, Range of Motion, Digital Assessment, Goniometry, Smartphone Application

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

[1]	Nomden, J.G., Slagers, A.J., Bergman, G.J.D., Winters, J.C., Kropmans, T.J.B. and Dijkstra, P.U. (2009) Interobserver Reliability of Physical Examination of Shoulder Girdle. Manual Therapy, 14, 152-159. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.math.2008.01.005
[2]	O’Neill, B.J., O’Briain, D., Hirpara, K.M., Shaughnesy, M., Yeatman, E.A. and Kaar, T.K. (2013) Digital Photography for Assessment of Shoulder Range of Motion: A Novel Clinical and Research Tool. International Journal of Shoulder Surgery, 7, 23-27. http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0973-6042.109888
[3]	Terwee, C.B., de Winter, A.F., Scholten, R.J., Jans, M.P., Devillé, W., van Schaardenburg, D. and Bouter, L.M. (2005) Interobserver Reproducibility of the Visual Estimation of Range of Motion of the Shoulder. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 86, 1356-1361. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2004.12.031
[4]	Gajdosik, R.L. and Bohannon, R.W. (1987) Clinical Measurement of Range of Motion Review of Goniometry Emphasizing Reliability and Validity. Physical Therapy, 67, 1867-1872.
[5]	Cools, A.M., De Wilde, L., Van Tongel, A., Ceyssens, C., Ryckewaert, R. and Cambier, D.C. (2014) Measuring Shoulder External and Internal Rotation Strength and Range of Motion: Comprehensive Intra-Rater and Inter-Rater Reliability Study of Several Testing Protocols. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, 23, 1454-1461. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2014.01.006
[6]	Riddle, D.L., Rothstein, J.M. and Lamb, R.L. (1987) Goniometric Reliability in a Clinical Setting Shoulder Measurement. Physical Therapy, 67, 668-673.
[7]	Shin, S.H., Ro, D.H.; Lee, O.-S., Oh, J.H. and Kim, S.H. (2012) Within-Day Reliability of Shoulder Range of Motion Measurement with a Smartphone. Manual Therapy, 17, 298-304. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.math.2012.02.010
[8]	Hayes, K., Walton, J.R., Szomor, Z.R. and Murrell, G.A. (2001) Reliability of Five Methods for Assessing Shoulder Range of Motion. Australian Journal of Physiotherapy, 47, 289-294. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0004-9514(14)60274-9
[9]	Moreno-Pérez, V., Moreside, J., Barbado, D. and Vera-Garcia, F.J. (2015) Comparison of Shoulder Rotation Range of Motion in Professional Tennis Players with and without History of Shoulder Pain. Manual Therapy, 20, 313-318. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.math.2014.10.008
[10]	de Winter, A.F., Heemskerk, M.A.M.B., Terwee, C.B., Jans, M.P.; Devillé, W., van Schaardenburg, et al. (2004) Inter-Observer Reproducibility of Measurements of Range of Motion in Patients with Shoulder Pain Using a Digital Inclinometer. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 5, 18. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-5-18
[11]	Epocrates (2013) Epocrates 2013 Mobile Trends Report: Maximizing Multi-Screen Engagement among Clinicians.
[12]	Ferriero, G., Sartorio, F., Foti, C., Primavera, D., Brigatti, E. and Vercelli, S. (2011) Reliability of a New Application for Smartphones (DrGoniometer) for Elbow Angle Measurement. PM&R, 3, 1153-1154. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pmrj.2011.05.014
[13]	Johnson, L.B., Sumner, S., Duong, T., Yan, P., Bajcsy, R., Abresch, R., et al. (2015) Validity and Reliability of Smartphone Magnetometer-Based Goniometer Evaluation of Shoulder Abduction—A Pilot Study. Manual Therapy. [Epub ahead of print] http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.math.2015.03.004
[14]	Milanese, S., Gordon, S., Buettner, P., Flavell, C., Ruston, S., Coe, D., et al. (2014) Reliability and Concurrent Validity of Knee Angle Measurement: Smart Phone App versus Universal Goniometer Used by Experienced and Novice Clinicians. Manual Therapy, 19, 569-574. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.math.2014.05.009
[15]	Werner, B.C., Holzgrefe, R.E., Griffin, J.W., Lyons, M.L., Cosgrove, C.T., Hart, J.M. and Brockmeier, S.F. (2014) Validation of an Innovative Method of Shoulder Range-of-Motion Measurement Using a Smartphone Clinometer Application. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, 23, e275-e282. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2014.02.030
[16]	Reese, N.B. and Bandy, W.D. (2013) Joint Range of Motion and Muscle Length Testing. Elsevier Health Sciences, Amsterdam.
[17]	Boone, D.C., Azen, S.P., Lin, C.M., Spence, C., Baron, C. and Lee, L. (1978) Reliability of Goniometric Measurements. Physical Therapy, 58, 1355-1360.
[18]	Landis, J.R. and Koch, G.G. (1977) The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data. Biometrics, 33, 159-174. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2529310
[19]	Smith, A.M., Barnes, S.A., Sperling, J.W., Farrell, C.M., Cummings, J.D. and Cofield, R.H. (2006) Patient and Physician-Assessed Shoulder Function after Arthroplasty. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (American), 88, 508-513. http://dx.doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.E.00132