A Novel Profit Potential Calculation Method Applied to Web Manufacturing


This study applies a constructive research approach to develop a novel profit potential calculation method framework suitable for web manufacturing processes. The theoretical framework is the profit function, which is further developed to form the web profit model. The profit model is optimized with respect to technology and process related input parameters to form the profit potentials. Then, new concepts: profit potentials on different optimization levels of increasing complexity are presented. Application of the novel method is demonstrated with a short case example. The findings show that the created profit potential framework can be applied to web process profit potential analyses. In addition, applying this framework profit potentials for other processes, products, and services can be defined in the future.

Share and Cite:

Pihko, R. (2015) A Novel Profit Potential Calculation Method Applied to Web Manufacturing. Modern Economy, 6, 423-429. doi: 10.4236/me.2015.64040.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.


[1] Quest, I. (2002) A Strategy for Profit. Paperloop, No. 8, 33-35.
[2] Quest, I. (2003) Maximising Profits while Reducing Capital Expenditure. Paper Technology, No. 2, 50-52.
[3] Shephard, R.W. (1970) Theory of Cost and Production Functions. Princeton University Press, Princeton.
[4] Fare, R. and Primont, D. (1995) Multi-Output Production and Duality: Theory and Applications. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, 172 p. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-0651-1
[5] Coelli, T. (2002) On the Econometric Estimation of the Distance Function Representation of a Production Technology. Discussion Paper 2000/42. Center for Operations Research and Econometrics, Universite Catholique de Louvain.
[6] Coelli, T., Grifell-Tatje, E. and Perelman, S. (2001) Capasity Utilisation and Profitability: A Decomposition of Short Run Profit Efficiency. CORE, Discussion Papers, 27 p.
[7] Pesonen, L. (2001) Implementation of Design to Profit in a Complex and Dynamic Business Context. Doctoral Thesis, University of Oulu, Oulu, 132 p.
[8] Goldratt, E. and Cox, J. (1984) The Goal: A Process of Ongoing Improvement. North River Press, Croton-on-Hudson, New York.
[9] Kleef, J., Rooij, M., Joore, L. and van der Plas, R. (2002) PM Uptime in Competitive Papermaking: The Role of the Human Factor (Part 1). Paper Technology, No. 11, 39-46.
[10] Boyd, G. and McClelland, J. (1999) The Impact of Environmental Constraints on Productivity Improvement in Integrated Paper Plants. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 38, 121-142. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/jeem.1999.1082
[11] Hannula, M. (2002) Total Productivity Measurement Based on Partial Productivity Ratios. International Journal of Production Economics, 78, 57-67. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0925-5273(00)00186-9
[12] Virtanen, S. (2000) A Method Defining Product Dependability Requirements and Specifying Input Data to Facilitate Simulation of Dependability. Doctoral Thesis, Acta Polytechnica Scandinavica, Mechanical Engineering Series No. 143, Helsinki University of Technology, Espoo, 80 p.
[13] Henley, E.J. and Kumamoto, H. (2000) Probabilistic Risk Assessment and Management for Engineers and Scientists. IEEE Press, New York, 620 p.
[14] McCormick, N.J. (1981) Reliability and Risk Analysis. Academic Press, Waltham, 446 p.
[15] Fogelholm, J. (2000) Cost Function Modelling in the Paper Industries. Doctoral Thesis, Helsinki University of Technology, Department of Industrial Engineering and Management, Report No. 11, Espoo, 102 p.
[16] Fogelholm, J. and Hamalainen, E. (2005) Computer-Based Budgeting and Investment Calculations (2004). Paper Technology, 45, 24-28.
[17] Treppe, K., Dixit, O. and Kuitunen, S. (2011) On Identifying and Capturing the Energy-Saving Potential. IPW, No. 5, 26-30.
[18] Linnala, M. and Hamalainen, J. (2011) Improvement of Cost Efficiency in Papermaking with Optimization Tools. Journal of Science & Technology for Forest Products and Processes, 1, 71-76.
[19] Peltonen, M., Kortelainen, H., Kuukkanen, R. and Virtanen, I. (2002) Life Decisions, a Special Tool for Life Cycle Cost and Profit Analysis Can Be Invaluable Support for Investment Decisions. Pulp & Paper Europe, 7, 14-15.
[20] Koskinen, J.P. (2008) A Framework for Analysing Contracting Strategies: Studies on Maximising Paper Production Line Life Cycle Profits. Doctoral Thesis, Tampere University of Technology, Publication No. 746, Tampere, 138 p.
[21] Kasanen, E., Lukka, K. and Siitonen, A. (1993) The Constructive Approach in Management Accounting Research. Journal of Management Accounting Research, 5, 243-264.
[22] Lukka, K. (2000) The Key Issues of Applying the Constructive Approach to Field Research. In: Reponen, T., Ed., Management Expertise in the New Millennium: In Commemoration of the 50th Anniversary of Turku School of Economics and Business Administration, Series A-1:2000, Publications of Turku School of Economics and Business Administration, Turku, 113-128.
[23] Labro, E. and Tuomela, T.S. (2003) On Bringing More Action into Management Accounting Research: Process Considerations Based on Two Constructive Case Studies. European Accounting Review, 12, 409-442. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0963818032000083559
[24] Fuss, M. and McFadden, D.L., Eds. (1978) Production Economics: A Dual Approach to Theory and Applications. Volume I: The Theory of Production. North-Holland, Amsterdam.
[25] Madetoja, E. and Makela, M. (2006) On Sensitivity Analysis of Non-Smooth Multidisciplinary Optimization Problems in Engineering Process Line Applications. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 31, 355-362. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00158-005-0591-4

Copyright © 2023 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.