An Ecologic Approach to Chinese Traditional Ethnic Sports Education

Xin Zhang; Siyong Xia

doi:10.4236/ape.2015.51006

Home > Journals > Medicine & Healthcare | Social Sciences & Humanities > APE

Advances in Physical Education > Vol.5 No.1, February 2015

An Ecologic Approach to Chinese Traditional Ethnic Sports Education ()

Xin Zhang, Siyong Xia

Department of Physical Education, Southwest University, Chongqing, China.

DOI: 10.4236/ape.2015.51006 PDF HTML XML 2,456 Downloads 3,041 Views

Abstract

This research aims to discuss and explore, from the perspective of Ecologic Education, the ecologic characteristics of the traditional Chinese sports education and the developmental direction of the teaching model of Chinese traditional ethnic sports education under the guide of the view of Ecologic Education. Firstly, this research explores the background of the appearing of the view of Ecologic Education and the basic ideas of Ecologic Education. After that, the writer of this article comes up with the ecologic characteristics particularly embraced in Chinese traditional ethnic sports education. These characteristics or features include the educational aim of pursuing harmony, the developmental model of advocating co-existence, the knowledge view of cultural circumstance, and the interactive and win-win relationship between teachers and students. After the analysis made above, the writer of this article further argues that under the view of Ecologic Education pursuing life education full of spirituality, focusing on the active construction of knowledge and exploring multiple ways of enculturation can be the very direction of the teaching model of Chinese traditional ethnic sports education.

Keywords

The View of Ecologic Education, Traditional Ethnic Sports Education, Teaching Model, Harmony, Co-Existence

Share and Cite:

Zhang, X. and Xia, S. (2015) An Ecologic Approach to Chinese Traditional Ethnic Sports Education. Advances in Physical Education, 5, 50-56. doi: 10.4236/ape.2015.51006.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

[1]	Bogdan, R. C., & Biklen, S. K. (2003). Qualitative Research of Education: An Introductive to Theories and Methods (4th ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
[2]	Doll Jr., W. E. (2000). Post-Modern Perspective on Curriculum (pp. 53). Beijing: Beijing Education Publishing House.
[3]	Liu, T. F. (2000). Life Affect and Educational Solicitude. Teacher Education Research, 6, 30.
[4]	Rolston, H. (2000). Environmental Ethics: Duties to and Values in the Natural World (pp. 14-15). Yang, T. J. (Trans.), Beijing: China Social Science Press.
[5]	Schumacher, E. F. (1984). Small Is Beautiful (pp. 66). Beijing: Commercial Press.
[6]	Su, X. G. (1998). The Ecologic Crisis and the Transvaluation of Western Culture. Journal of Peking University (Philosophy and Social Science), 1, 63-70.
[7]	Sun, J. Y., & Li, Y. K. (2010). Co-Existence Education: The Compulsory Choice under Cultural Un-Balance, an Anthropological Study of the Hei Yi Zhuang Nationality in Napo County. Journal of Guangxi Normal University (Philosophy and Social Science Edition), 5, 7.
[8]	Teng, S. Y. (2006). Description of Artistic Society: The Pioneering Symposium on Artistic Education (pp. 86). Nanjing: Nanjing Press.
[9]	White, L. (1993). The Historical Roots of Our Ecologic Crisis. In I. Barbour (Ed.), Western Man and Environmental Ethics: Attitudes towards Nature and Technology (pp. 18). Massachusetts: Addison Wesley Publishing Company.
[10]	Zhu, D. Q., & Peng, M. (2009). The Evolvement of the View of Knowledge and the Choice of Teaching Models. Journal of Teaching and Management, 10, 3-5.