Dominant Meaning Method for Intelligent Topic-Based Information Agent towards More Flexible MOOCs


The use of agent technology in a dynamic environment is rapidly growing as one of the powerful technologies and the need to provide the benefits of the Intelligent Information Agent technique to massive open online courses, is very important from various aspects including the rapid growing of MOOCs environments, and the focusing more on static information than on updated information. One of the main problems in such environment is updating the information to the needs of the student who interacts at each moment. Using such technology can ensure more flexible information, lower waste time and hence higher earnings in learning. This paper presents Intelligent Topic-Based Information Agent to offer an updated knowledge including various types of resource for students. Using dominant meaning method, the agent searches the Internet, controls the metadata coming from the Internet, filters and shows them into a categorized content lists. There are two experiments conducted on the Intelligent Topic-Based Information Agent: one measures the improvement in the retrieval effectiveness and the other measures the impact of the agent on the learning. The experiment results indicate that our methodology to expand the query yields a considerable improvement in the retrieval effectiveness in all categories of Google Web Search API. On the other hand, there is a positive impact on the performance of learning session.

Share and Cite:

Razek, M. (2014) Dominant Meaning Method for Intelligent Topic-Based Information Agent towards More Flexible MOOCs. Journal of Intelligent Learning Systems and Applications, 6, 186-196. doi: 10.4236/jilsa.2014.64015.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.


[1] Chin, D.B., Dohmen, I.M. and Schwartz, D.L. (2013) Young Children Can Learn Scientific Reasoning with Teachable Agents. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 6, 248-257.
[2] Business Dictionary (2014) Definition of Agent Technology.
[3] Chen, B. and Cheng, H.H. (2013) A Review of the Applications of Agent Technology in Traffic and Transportation Systems. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 11, 485-497.
[4] Massis, B.E. (2013) What’s New in Libraries MOOCs and the Library. New Library World, 114, 267-270.
[5] Joshi, K., Verma, A., Kandpal, A, Garg, S., Chauhan, R. and Goudar, R. (2013) Ontology Based Fuzzy Classification of Web Documents for Semantic Information Retrieval. IEEE-2013 Sixth International Conference on Contemporary Computing (IC3), 8-10 August 2013, 1-5.
[6] Gregoire, P.L., Desjardins, C., Laumonier, J. and Chaib-draa, B. (2007) Urban Traffic Control Based on Learning Agents. IEEE Intelligent Transportation Systems Conference, Washington DC, 30 September-3 October 2007, 916-921.
[7] Vecchiola, C., Grosso, A., Passadore, A. and Boccalatte, A. (2009) Agent Service: A Framework for Distributed Multi-Agent System Development. International Journal of Computers and Applications, 31, 202-2968.
[8] Kop, R., Fournier, H. and Mak, S.F.J. (2011) A Pedagogy of Abundance or a Pedagogy to Support Human Beings? Participant Support on Massive Open Online Courses. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 12.
[9] Lin, H. and Wang, L. (2008) Query Expansion for Document Retrieval by Mining Additional Query Terms. Information and Management Sciences, 19, 17-30.
[10] Ciaramita, M., Hofmann, T. and Johnson, M. (2003) Hierarchical Semantic Classification: Word Sense Disambiguation with World Knowledge.
[11] Akrivas, G., Wallace, M., Andreou, G., Stamou, G. and Kollias, S. (2002) Context-Sensitive Semantic Query Expansion. 2002 IEEE International Conference on Artificial Intelligence Systems (ICAIS’02), Divnomorskoe, September 2002, 109-114.
[12] Razek, M., Frasson, C. and Kaltenbach, M. (2006) Dominant Meanings towards Individualized Web Search for Learning Environments. In: Magoulas, G.D. and Chen, S.Y., Eds., Advances in Web-Based Education: Personalized Learning Environments, IDEA Group Publishing, 46-69.
[13] Google (2014) Web Search API Custom Ranking.
[14] Daniel, J. (2012) Making Sense of MOOCs: Musings in a Maze of Myth, Paradox and Possibility. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 3, 4-24.
[15] McAuley, A., Stewart, B., Siemens, G. and Cormier, D. (2010) The MOOC Model for Digital Practice. SSHRC Application, Knowledge Synthesis for the Digital Economy.
[16] Voss, B.D. (2013) Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs): A Primer for University and College Board Members. Association of Governing Boards (AGB) of Universities and Colleges.
[17] Kerry, W. (2013) Academic Libraries in the Age of MOOCs. Reference Services Review, 41, 576-587.
[18] Gillet, D. (2013) Personal Learning Environments as Enablers for Connectivist MOOCs. Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Information Technology Based Higher Education and Training, Antalya, 10-12 October 2013, 1-5.
[19] Greenberg, B., Schwartz, R. and Horn, M. (2013) The Course in of Blended Learning: Personalizing Education for Students. Massive Open Online Course.
[20] Razek, M. (2013) Towards More Efficient Image Web Search. Intelligent Information Management, 5, 196-203.
[21] Severance, C. (2012) Teaching the World: Daphne Koller and Coursera. IEEE Computer Society, 45, 8-9.
[22] Meng, W., Yu, C. and Liu, K. (2002) Building Efficient and Effective Meta-Search Engines. ACM Computing Surveys, 34, 48-89.

Copyright © 2022 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.