A Preliminary Study on Rainfall Pattern before and after the January 26, 2001 Bhuj Earthquake (M_w 7.7) over Kachchh Region of Western Peninsular, India

Parul C. Trivedi^1,2*, H. P. Joshi², Imtiyaz A. Parvez³

¹India Meteorological Department, Ahmedabad, India.
²Department of Physics, Saurashtra University, Rajkot, India.
³CSIR Centre for Mathematical modeling and Computer Simulation (C-MMACS), Bangalore, India.

DOI: 10.4236/ijg.2014.510092                

Abstract

Under the influence of great debate on relation between earthquake and rainfall, some scientists have carried out detailed study and now commonly accepted that heavy rainfall can trigger earthquake at the faults or fractures depending upon the local geology. Here, an attempt is made to check relation between earthquake and rainfall with different scientific approaches. We have attempted to critically examine the relation between the Bhuj earthquake-aftershocks sequence and the rainfall pattern over the region as large earthquake (M_w 7.7) has occurred on January 26, 2001 in Kachchh region of western peninsular shield of India and the aftershocks are being reported till the date. We have analyzed rainfall data for 20 years, i.e. 10 years before and 10 years after the main shock of January 26, 2001, recorded by three meteorological observatories in the Kachchh region. We have studied annual total rainfall for two decades, annual rainfall departures from the climate normals, number of rainy days and number of heavy rainfall days during the period for all the three meteorological observatories of Kachchh region. We have found significant increase in all the measured rainfall parameters i.e. annual total rainfall, number of rainy days and number of heavy rainfall days over the Kachchh region during last decade i.e., from 2001 to 2010 after the main shock. Numbers of negative departures have been decreased during the last decade compared to previous decade. Thus rainfall pattern over Kachchh region is being changed. This increase in rainfall activity over Kachchh region may have been influenced by large earthquake and continuing aftershock activities over the region.

Keywords

Earthquake, Meteorological Parameters, Rainfall, Kachchh Region

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

[1]	Morozova, L.I. (1997) Dynamics of Cloudy Anomalies above Fracture Regions during Natural and Anthropogenically Caused Seismic Activities. Fizika Zemli, 9, 94-96.
[2]	Gao, A., Silver, P., Linde, A. and Sacks S. (2000) Annual Modulation of Triggered Seismicity Following the 1992 Landers Earthquake in California. Nature, 406, 500-504. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/35020045
[3]	Hainzl, S., Kraft, T., Wassermann, J., Igel, H. and Schmedes, E. (2006) Evidence for Rainfall-Triggered Earthquake Activity. Geophysical Research Letters, 33, L19303. http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2006GL027642
[4]	Miller, S.A. (2008) Rain-Triggered Earthquakes and Their Dependence on Karst Geology. Geophysical Journal International, 173, 334-338. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.2008.03735.x
[5]	Kayal, J.R. (2008) Microearthquake Seismology and Seismotectonics of South Asia. McGraw Hill Publication, India.
[6]	Costain, J.K., Bollinger, G.A. and Speer, J.A. (1987) Hydroseismicity: A Hypothesis for the Role of Water in the Generation of Intraplate Seismicity. Seismological Research Letters, 58, 41-64.
[7]	Sayles, R.W. (1913) Earthquakes and Rainfall. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 2, 51-56.
[8]	Rastoti, B.K., Kumar, S. and Aggrawal S. (2013) Seismicity of Gujarat. Natural Hazards, 65, 1027-1044. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11069-011-0077-1