Share This Article:

Analysis of Studies from 2000-2010 in Real Option Theory and Application to OM

Abstract Full-Text HTML Download Download as PDF (Size:189KB) PP. 16-23
DOI: 10.4236/ajor.2011.11003    4,860 Downloads   10,670 Views   Citations
Author(s)    Leave a comment

ABSTRACT

Traditional project investment methods, such as the discounted cash flow (DCF) with a fixed static plan, are no longer sufficient to assist the corporate strategies of seizing opportunities and profitability. The option pricing formula includes a theoretical framework for pricing financial options, assuming that the risk in a financial hedged position is zero, if the option is adjusted continuously in a short position. Hence, the real options revolution arose in response to the dissatisfaction of corporation practitioners with traditional capital budgeting techniques, such as standard discount cash flow. This paper analyzes relevant articles from the “Journal of Operations Management” and “Management Sciences” as related to real options theory in the field of operations management. The goal of this study is to review and identify the gaps in application to real option theory in their studies. Finally, this paper provides suggestions for future researchers.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Cite this paper

H. Chen, "Analysis of Studies from 2000-2010 in Real Option Theory and Application to OM," American Journal of Operations Research, Vol. 1 No. 1, 2011, pp. 16-23. doi: 10.4236/ajor.2011.11003.

References

[1] Yeo, K.T. & Qiu, F. (2003). The value of management flexibility - a real option approach to investment evaluation. International Journal of Project Management, 21, 243-250.doi:10.1016/S0263-7863(02)00025-X
[2] Black, F. & Scholes, M. (1973). The Pricing of Options and Corporate Liabilities. The Journal of Political Economy, 81(3), 637-654.doi:10.1086/260062
[3] Merton, R.C., Scholes, M.S., & Gladstein, M.L. (1982). The Returns and Risks of Alternative Put-Option Portfolio Investment Strategies. Journal of Business,55(1), 1-55. doi:10.1086/296153
[4] Cox, J.C. & Ross, S.A. (1976). The Valuation of Options for Alternative Stochastic Processes. Journal of Financial Economics, 3, 145-166. doi:10.1016/0304-405X(76)90023-4
[5] Trigeorgis, L. (1993). Real Options and Interactions with Financial Flexibility. Financial Management, 22(3), 202-224.
[6] Amram, M. & Kulatilaka, N. (1999). Disciplined decisions: aligning strategy with the financial markets. Harvard Business Review, 77(1), 95-104.
[7] Boyabatl?, O. and L. B. Toktay. (2004). Operational hedging: a review with discussion. Working Paper. INSEAD.
[8] Weiss, D. & Maher, M.W. (2009). Operational hedging against adverse circumstances.Journal of Operations Ma- nagement, 27, 362-373. doi:10.1016/j.jom.2008.10.003
[9] Jack, E. P. andRaturi, A. (2002).Sources of volume flexibility and their impact on performance.Journal of Operations Management, 20, 519-548. doi:10.1016/S0272-6963(01)00079-1
[10] da Silveira, G. (2006). Effects of simplicity and discipli- ne on operational flexibility: An empirical reexamination of the rigid flexibility model. Journal of Operations Management, 24, 932-947. doi:10.1016/j.jom.2005.11.004
[11] Sawhney, R. (2006). Interplay between uncertainty and flexibility across the value-chain: Towards a transformation model of manufacturing flexibility. Journal of Operations Management, 24, 476-493. doi:10.1016/j.jom.2005.11.008
[12] Pagell, M. and Krause, D.R. (2004). Re-exploring the relationship between flexibility and the external environment. Journal of Operations Management, 21, 629-649.doi:10.1016/j.jom.2003.11.002
[13] Swamidass, P.M., and Newell, W.T. (1987). Manufacturing strategy, environmental uncertainty and performance: a path analytic model. Management Science, 33, 509-524. doi:10.1287/mnsc.33.4.509
[14] Duray, R., Ward, P., Milligan, G., & Berry, W. (2000). Approaches to mass customization: configurations and empirical validation. Journal of Operations Management, 18, 605-625.doi:10.1016/S0272-6963(00)00043-7
[15] Dilts, D.M. and Pence, K.R. (2006). Impact of role in the decision to fail: An exploratory study of terminated projects. Journal of Operations Management, 24, 378-396. doi:10.1016/j.jom.2004.12.001
[16] Folta, T., Delmar, F., & Wennbery, K. (2010). Hybrid Entrepreneurship. Management Science, 56(2), 253-269. doi:10.1287/mnsc.1090.1094
[17] Chick, S. & Gans, N. (2009). Economic Analysis of Simulation Selection Problems. Management Science, 55(3), 421-437.doi:10.1287/mnsc.1080.0949
[18] Gamba, A. & Fusari, N. (2009). Valuing Modularity as a Real Option. Management Science, 55(11), 1877-1896. doi:10.1287/mnsc.1090.1070
[19] Baldwin, C.Y. and Clark, K.B. (2006). The Architectureof Participation: Does Code Architecture Mitigate Free Riding in the Open Source Development Model? Manag-ement Science, 52(7), 1116-1127. doi:10.1287/mnsc.1060.0546
[20] Kumar, P. and Turnbull, S.M. (2008). Optimal Patentingand Licensing of Financial Innovations. Management Science, 54(12), 2012-2023. doi:10.1287/mnsc.1080.0898
[21] Mello, A.S., Parsons, J.E., and Triantis, A. (1995). An Integrated Model of Multinational Flexibility and Financial Hedging. Journal of International Economics, 39(1-2), 27-51.doi:10.1016/0022-1996(94)01362-V
[22] Burnetas, A. and Ritchken, P. (2005). Option Pricing with Downward-Sloping Demand Curves: The Case of Supply Chain Options. Management Science, 51(4), 566-580.doi:10.1287/mnsc.1040.0342
[23] Pandza, K., Horsburgh, S., Gorton, K., and Polajnar, A.(2003). A real options approach to managing resources-and capabilities. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 23(9), 1010-1032. doi:10.1108/01443570310491756

  
comments powered by Disqus

Copyright © 2019 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.