Implementation of Product Design Tools for the Development of an Automated Vegetable Chopper


In the era of industrialization, automatic machines become an integral part of human life. These machines help to reduce the time needed to do a specific task. Nowadays, human life becomes more competitive and faster than the previous. Automation brought about by technology has saved human effort and time to a large extent. Slicing vegetables are a risky and time-consuming task in our busy life. This project is aimed at solving above stated problems by introducing a special product named Automatic Vegetable Chopper. This chopper is mainly designed to reduce human effort and make the job of chopping vegetables much easier and faster. Its main features are fully automated, easily portable, less power consumption and changeable stainless, sharp blade, etc. This product is designed and established by following a structured product design process and with the help of a board of design engineers. Product planning, customer needs identifying, product specification, concept screening, concept scoring and bill of materials are tools that mainly used to accomplish this task. Finally, this paper also suggests various techniques and opportunities of product planning in manufacturing industries as future recommendations.

Share and Cite:

S. Talapatra, M. Shakil, P. Mondal and M. Islam, "Implementation of Product Design Tools for the Development of an Automated Vegetable Chopper," Technology and Investment, Vol. 5 No. 1, 2014, pp. 1-7. doi: 10.4236/ti.2014.51001.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.


[1] K. T. Ulrich and S. D. Eppinger, “Product Design and Development,” 2nd Edition, McGraw-Hill, New York, 2000.
[2] J. Nevins and D. Whitney, “Concurrent Design of Products and Processes,” McGraw-Hill, New York, 1989.
[3] H. J. Wassenaar and W. Chen, “An Approach to Decision-Based Design,” Proceedings of ASME DETC’01, Pittsburgh, 9-12 September 2001.
[4] S. Pugh, “Total Design—Integrated Methods for Successful Product Engineering,” Addison-Wesley, Boston, 1990.
[5] D. L. Thurston and J. V. Carnahan, “Fuzzy Ratings and Utility Analysis in Preliminary Design Evaluation of Multiple Attributes,” Journal of Mechanical Design, Vol. 114, No. 4, 1992, pp. 648-658.
[6] S. H. Yeo, M. W. Mak and A. P. Balon, “Analysis of Decision-Making Methodologies for Desirability Score of Conceptual Design,” Journal of Engineering Design, Vol. 15, No. 2, 2004, pp. 195-208.
[7] A. M. King and S. Sivaloganathan, “Development of a Methodology for Concept Selection in Flexible Design Strategies,” Journal of Engineering Design, Vol. 10, No. 4, 1999, pp. 329-349.
[8] T. K. See and K. Lewis, “Multi Attribute Decision Making Using Hypothetical Equivalents,” Proceedings of ASME DETC’02, Montreal, 29 September-2 October 2002.
[9] J. Hauser and D. Clausing, “The House of Quality,” Harvard Business Review, May 1988, pp. 67-73.
[10] M. Salonen and M. Perttula, “Utilization of Concept Selection Methods—A Survey of Finnish Industry,” Proceeding of IDETC/CIE, Long Beach, 24-28 September 2005, pp. 18-27.
[11] J. Wang, “Improved Engineering Design Concept Selection Using Fuzzy Sets,” International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing, Vol. 15, No. 1, 2002, pp. 18-27.
[12] N. P. Suh, “The Principles of Design,” Oxford University Press, New York, 1990.
[13] M. Hu and J. Pieprzak, “Using Axiomatic Design to Improve Conceptual Design Robustness in Design for Six Sigma (DFSS) Methodology,” International Journal of Six Sigma and Competitive Advantage (IJSSCA), Vol. 1, No. 3, 2005, pp. 245-262.

Copyright © 2023 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.