Reclamation of the Polymer-Flooding Produced Water
Chunjie HAN, Yang LIU, Tan ZHAO, Guolin JING
DOI: 10.4236/jwarp.2009.11005   PDF   HTML     7,749 Downloads   13,732 Views   Citations


In order to resolve the discharge problem of the polymer-flooding produced water (PFPW) in crude oil ex-traction, the PFPW was treated by a four-grade and four-segment (four GS) electrodialysis reversal(EDR) set-up. The testing results show that the treated PFPW has two kinds, one is the diluted treated PFPW, the total dissolved solids (TDS) of the diluted treated PFPW is less than the original PFPW, the diluted treated PFPW is feasible for confecting polymer solution; another one is the concentrated treated PFPW, the TDS of the concentrated treated PFPW exceeds the original PFPW, the concentrated treated PFPW is feasible for replacing the PFPW as the injecting water in the water-flooding process for high permeability layer. This treatment technology can not only decrease environment pollution resulted by the PFPW discharge, but also achieve closed-circuit of the water resource during crude oil extraction by using polymer flooding technology.

Share and Cite:

C. HAN, Y. LIU, T. ZHAO and G. JING, "Reclamation of the Polymer-Flooding Produced Water," Journal of Water Resource and Protection, Vol. 1 No. 1, 2009, pp. 29-34. doi: 10.4236/jwarp.2009.11005.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.


[1] D. K. Han, C. Z. Yang, Z. Q. Zhang, Z. H. Lou, and Y. I. Chang, Journal of Petroleum Science and Engi-neering, 22 (1-3), pp. 181-188, 1999.
[2] D. M. Wang, J. C. Cheng, and J. Z. Wu, SPE 49018, pp. 313-317, 1998.
[3] Q. M. Wang, Petroleum Geology, and Oilfield Develop-ment in Daqing, 18 (4), pp. 1-5, 1999.
[4] K. C. Taylor, SPE 29008, pp. 675-690, 1995.
[5] T. L. Chen, Z. Y. Song, Y. Fan, C. Z. Hu, L. Qiu, and J. X. Tang, SPE Reservoir Evaluation and Engineer-ing, 1 (1), pp. 24-29, 1998.
[6] G. L. Jing, X. Y. Wang, and C. J. Han, “The effect of oilfield polymer-flooding wastewater on anion-exchange membrane performance,” Desalination, 220, pp. 386-393 (Proceedings Greece 2007), 2008.
[7] R. B. Zhao and X. G. Yue, “Flowing characteristics of 2-acrylamide-2-methyl propane-sulfonic-acid copolymer solution in porous medium,” Journal of Acta Petrolei Sinica, 26 (2), pp. 85-97, 2005.
[8] L. Liangxiong, T. M. Whitworth, and R. Lee, “Separation of inorganic solutes from oil-field produced water using a compacted bentonite membrane,” Journal of Membrane Science, 217, pp. 215-225, 2003.
[9] G. F. Doran, F. H. Carini, D. A. Fruth, J. A. Drago, and L. Y. C. Leong, “Evaluation of technologies to treat oil field produced water to drinking water or reuse quality,” Pro-ceedings of the Annual SPE Technical Conference, San Antonio, Texas, 1997.
[10] J. Pellegrino, C. Gorman, and L. Richards, “A speculative hybrid reverse osmosis electrodialysis unit operation,” Desalination, 214, pp. 11-30, 2007.
[11] C. Murray-Gulde, J. E. Heatley, T. Karanfil, J. H. Rod-gers Jr., and J. E. Myers, “Performance of a hybrid re-verse osmosis-constructed wetland treatment system for brackish oil field produced water,” Water Research, 37, pp. 705-713, 2003.
[12] R. Bradley, “Pilot testing high efficiency reverse osmosis on gas well produced water,” Proceedings of the Interna-tional Water Conference (61st Annual Meeting), Pitts-burg, PA, 2000.
[13] T. Sirivedhin, J. McCue, and L. Dallbauman, “Reclaim-ing produced water for beneficial use: Salt removal by electrodialysis,” Journal of Membrane Science, 243, pp. 335-343, 2004.

Copyright © 2023 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.