Errors during Paediatric Cardiac Anaesthesia: Reporting and Learning

DOI: 10.4236/ojanes.2013.39086   PDF   HTML     2,966 Downloads   4,310 Views   Citations

Abstract

Incident reporting is a reliable quality assurance tool, frequently used in anaesthesia to identify errors. It was introduced in anaesthesia by Cooper in 1978 and since then several institutions have adopted this system to find adverse events and near misses. We think that the incident reporting would be more beneficial for prolonged and technically complex procedures like paediatric cardiac surgery. Methods: All paediatric CHD patients scheduled for cardiac surgery were included in this audit. Thoracic and general surgery patients were excluded. Any event in preoperative area, induction room, operating room and during transfer to cardiac ICU was documented in a predesigned proforma by resident/consultant. This proforma included information regarding demographics, the type and severity and responsible factors for the event. Results: 134 patients were included in this two and half years audit. 88 patients were male (65.7%) and 46 (34.3%) were female. The age of the patients ranged from one day to 15 years. Total 105 incidents were noticed in 61 patients. 46 incidents were declared as major events which were potentially serious while 59 events were of minor nature. Cuffed endotracheal tube was used in 73% patients. The majority of events occurred in the pre-bypass period. Most of the incidents were related to cardiovascular system (73%), followed by pharmacological incidents. Human factors (74%) were mainly responsible for the incidents. Conclusion: Incident reporting is a reliable and feasible method of improving quality care in developing countries. It helps in identifying areas which need improvement and helps in developing guidelines to improve safety.

Share and Cite:

M. Hamid, M. Irfan Akhtar, F. Nasim Minai and A. Gangwani, "Errors during Paediatric Cardiac Anaesthesia: Reporting and Learning," Open Journal of Anesthesiology, Vol. 3 No. 9, 2013, pp. 408-412. doi: 10.4236/ojanes.2013.39086.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

[1] J. B. Cooper, R. S. Newbower, C. D. Long and B. Mc-Peek, “Preventable Anesthesia Mishaps: A Study of Human Factors,” Anesthesiology, Vol. 49, No. 6, 1978, pp. 399-406.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00000542-197812000-00004
[2] A. A. Gawande, M. J. Zinner, D. M. Studdert and T. A. Brennan, “Analysis of Errors Reported by Surgeons at Three Teaching Hospitals,” Surgery, Vol. 133, No. 6, 2003, pp. 614-621. http://dx.doi.org/10.1067/msy.2003.169
[3] L. Homsted, “Institute of Medicine Report: To Err Is Human: Building a Safer Health Care System,” The Florida Nurse, Vol. 48, No. 1, 2000, p. 6.
[4] P. Sirivararom, T. Virankabutra, N. Hungsawanich, P. Premsamran and W. Sriraj, “The Thai Anesthesia Incidents Monitoring Study (Thai AIMS) of Adverse Events after Spinal Anesthesia: An Analysis of 1996 Incident Reports,” Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand, Vol. 92, No. 8, 2009, pp. 1033-1039.
[5] E. A. Martinez, J. A. Marsteller, D. A. Thompson, et al., “The Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists’ FOCUS Initiative: Locating Errors through Networked Surveillance (LENS) Project Vision,” Anesthesia & Analgesia, Vol. 110, No. 2, 2010, pp. 307-311.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0b013e3181c92b9c
[6] E. A. Martinez, A. Shore, E. Colantuoni, et al., “Cardiac Surgery Errors: Results from the UK National Reporting and Learning System,” International Journal for Quality in Health Care, Vol. 23, No. 2, 2011, pp. 151-158.
[7] D. W. Bates, D. J. Cullen, N. Laird, et al., “Incidence of Adverse Drug Events and Potential Adverse Drug Events, Implications for Prevention. ADE Prevention Study Group,” The Journal of the American Medical Association, Vol. 274, No. 1, 1995, pp. 29-34.
[8] P. Barach, J. K. Johnson, A. Ahmad, et al., “A Prospective Observational Study of Human Factors, Adverse Events, and Patient Outcomes in Surgery for Pediatric Cardiac Disease,” The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Vol. 136, No. 6, 2008, pp. 1422-1428.
[9] S. K. R. Catchpole, A. E. Giddings, M. R. de Leval, et al., “Identification of Systems Failures in Successful Paediatric Cardiac Surgery,” Ergonomics, Vol. 49, No. 5-6, 2006, pp. 567-588.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00140130600568865
[10] R. P. Mahajan, “Critical Incident Reporting and Learning,” The British Journal of Anaesthesia, Vol. 105, No. 1, 2010, pp. 69-75.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bja/aeq133
[11] M. Ricci, A. P. Goldman, M. R. de Leval, G. A. Cohen, F. Devaney and J. Carthey, “Pitfalls of Adverse Event Reporting in Paediatric Cardiac Intensive Care,” Archives of Disease in Childhood, Vol. 89, No. 9, 2004, pp. 856-859.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/adc.2003.040154
[12] J. M. Steven, “Congenital Heart Disease and Anesthesia-Related Cardiac Arrest: Connecting the Dots,” Anesthesia & Analgesia, Vol. 110, No. 5, 2010, pp. 1255-1256.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0b013e3181d7c059
[13] A. D. Paix, M. F. Bullock, W. B. Runciman and J. A. Williamson, “Crisis Management during Anaesthesia: Problems Associated with Drug Administration during Anaesthesia,” Quality & Safety in Health Care, Vol. 14, No. 3, 2005, p. E15.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/qshc.2002.004119
[14] R. Maaloe, M. la Cour, A. Hansen, et al., “Scrutinizing Incident Reporting in Anaesthesia: Why Is an Incident Perceived as Critical?” Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica, Vol. 50, No. 8, 2006, pp. 1005-1013.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-6576.2006.01092.x
[15] M. Chakravarthy, “Errors in Cardiac Anesthesia—A Deterrent to Patient Safety,” Annals of Cardiac Anaesthesia, Vol. 13, No. 2, 2010, pp. 87-88.
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0971-9784.62925

  
comments powered by Disqus

Copyright © 2020 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.