Share This Article:

Adaptation in Stochastic Dynamic Systems—Survey and New Results I

Abstract Full-Text HTML Download Download as PDF (Size:368KB) PP. 17-23
DOI: 10.4236/ijcns.2011.41002    3,616 Downloads   7,310 Views   Citations

ABSTRACT

This paper surveys the field of adaptation mechanism design for uncertainty parameter estimation as it has developed over the last four decades. The adaptation mechanism under consideration generally serves two tightly coupled functions: model identification and change point detection. After a brief introduction, the pa-per discusses the generalized principles of adaptation based both on the engineering and statistical literature. The stochastic multiinput multioutput (MIMO) system under consideration is mathematically described and the problem statement is given, followed by a definition of the active adaptation principle. The distinctive property of the principle as compared with the Minimum Prediction Error approach is outlined, and a plan for a more detailed exposition to be provided in forthcoming papers is given.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Cite this paper

I. Semushin, "Adaptation in Stochastic Dynamic Systems—Survey and New Results I," International Journal of Communications, Network and System Sciences, Vol. 4 No. 1, 2011, pp. 17-23. doi: 10.4236/ijcns.2011.41002.

References

[1] C. S. Draper, “Principles of Optimalizing Control Systems and an Application to the Inertial Combustion Engine,” ASME Publications, Mawson, 1951.
[2] R. E. Kalman, “Design of a Self-Optimizing Control Systems,” Transactions of ACME, Vol. 80, 1958, pp. 468-478.
[3] A. A. Feldbaum, “The Theory of Dual Control I,” Automation and Remote Control, Vol. 21, No. 9, 1961, pp. 874-883.
[4] A. A. Feldbaum, “The Theory of Dual Control II,” Automation and Remote Control, Vol. 21, No. 11, 1961, pp. 1033-1039.
[5] A. A. Feldbaum, “The Theory of Dual Control III,” Automation and Remote Control, Vol. 22, No. 1, 1962, pp. 1-12.
[6] A. A. Feldbaum, “The Theory of Dual Control IV,” Automation and Remote Control, Vol. 22, No. 2, 1962, pp. 109-121.
[7] P. E. Caines, “Linear Stochastic Systems,” John Wiley and Sons, Inc., Hoboken, 1988.
[8] Y. Z. Tsypkin, “Adaptation and Learning in Automatic Systems,” Nauka Publications, Moscow, 1968.
[9] T. L. Lai, “Sequential Changepoint Detection in Quality Control and Dynamical Systems,” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B (Methodological), Vol. 57, No. 4, 1995, pp. 613-658.
[10] P. Ansay, M. Gevers and V. Wertz, “Closed-Loop or Open-Loop Models in Identification for Control?” In: P. Frank, Ed., CD-ROM Proceedings of 5th European Control Conference, Karlsruhe, 31 August-3 September 1999, File F0544.
[11] O. Grospeaud, T. Poinot and J. C. Trigeassou, “Unbiased Identification in Closed-Loop by an Output Error Technique,” In: P. Frank, Ed., CD-ROM Proceedings of 5th European Control Conference, Karlsruhe, 31 August-3 September 1999, File F0792.
[12] L. Ljung, “Convergence Analysis of Parametric Identification Methods,” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, Vol. AC-23, No. 5, 1978, pp. 770-783. doi:10.1109/ TAC.1978.1101840
[13] A. H. Jazwinski, “Stochastic Processes and Filtering Theory,” Academic Press, Cambridge, 1970.
[14] H. Kaufman and D. Beaulier, “Adaptive Parameter Identification,” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, Vol. AC-17, No. 5, 1972, pp. 729-731. doi:10.1109/TAC.1972.1100111
[15] H. Cramér and M. R. Leadbetter, “Stationary and Related Stochastic Processes. Sample Function Properties and Their Applications,” John Wiley and Sons, Inc., Hoboken, 1967.

  
comments powered by Disqus

Copyright © 2019 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.