Democratic Freedom of Expression

DOI: 10.4236/ojpp.2013.33058   PDF   HTML     6,865 Downloads   8,725 Views   Citations


This paper suggests the democratic direction in which the right of freedom of expression should be conceived and applied. In the first two sections it suggests some counter-examples to, and diagnoses of, the libertarian and liberal conceptions of freedom of expression, taking Scanlon (1972) and Scanlon (1979), respectively, to be their chief proponents. The paper suggests that these conceptions cannot take into account clear examples, like fraudulent propaganda, which should not be legal. The democratic conception takes it to heart that the pillars upon which the right of freedom of expression is founded are individual and collective autonomy, the right to know facts of public interest and information necessary for effective democratic control of government. The paper suggests that in a time when private powers seriously threaten these pillars, it is correct for the government to step in to provide the framework in which genuine discussion geared toward fulfilling the objectives of these pillars can take place.

Share and Cite:

Restrepo, R. (2013). Democratic Freedom of Expression. Open Journal of Philosophy, 3, 380-390. doi: 10.4236/ojpp.2013.33058.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.


[1] Aalberg, T., Aelst, P., & Curran, J. (2010). Media systems and the political information environment: A cross-national comparison. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 15, 255-271. doi:10.1177/1940161210367422
[2] Achbar, M., & Wintonick, P. (2002). Manufacturing consent: Noam Chomsky and the media. New York: Zeitgeist Video.
[3] Armoa, M. (2012). Los propagandistas del régimen Stroessner.
[4] Arrow, K. (1951/1963). Social choice and individual values. New Haven: Yale University Press.
[5] Baker, D. (2002). The run-up in home prices: Is it real or is it another bubble? Washington DC: Center for Economic and Policy Research.
[6] Baker, D. (2011). The end of loser liberalism: Making markets progressive. Washington DC: Center for Economic and Policy Research.
[7] Blaustein, E., & Zubieta, M. (1998). Decíamos ayer: La prensa Argentina bajo el proceso. Buenos Aires: Colihue.
[8] Bentham, J. (1843). Anarchical fallacies. In The works of Jeremy Bentham: Published under the superintendence of his executor, John Bowring. Vol. 2. Edinburgh: William Tait.
[9] Blackstone, W. (1978). Commentaries on the laws of England. New York: Garland.
[10] Bartley, K., & O’Briain, D. (2003). The revolution will not be televised. Bórd Scannán na héireann, Nederlandse Programma Stichtin, Radio Telefís éireann, British Broadcasting Corporation, Zweites Deutsches Fernsehen, Arte, Yleisradio, Power Pictures 2002 Ltd.
[11] Braddon-Mitchell, D., & West, C. (2004). What is free speech? Journal of Political Philosophy, 12, 437-460. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9760.2004.00208.x
[12] Bugliosi, V. (2008). The prosecution of George W. Bush for murder. New York: Vanguard Press.
[13] Chang, H. (2007). Bad samaritans: The myth of free trade and the secret history of capitalism. New York: Bloomsbury Press.
[14] Checa Godoy, A. (2012). La banca y la propiedad de medios: El caso de Ecuador. Revista Latina de Comunicación Social, 67, 125-147.
[15] Chomsky, N. (1980). Some elementary remarks on the rights of freedom of expression. In R. Faurisson (Ed.), Memoire in defense.
[16] Chomsky, N., & Herman, E. (1988/2002). Manufacturing consent: The political economy of the mass media. New York: Pantheon Books.
[17] CNN (2012).
[18] Coady, A. (2008). Messy morality. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
[19] Condorcet, M. de (1785/1972). Essai sur l’application de l’analyse a la probabilité des décisions rendues à la pluralité des voix. New York: Chelsea Pub. Co.
[20] Crewdson, J., & Treaster, J. (1977). CIA established many links to journalists in US and abroad. New York Times, 27 December 1977.
[21] Crispin, M. (2005). None dare call it stolen: Ohio, the election and America’s servile press. Harper’s Magazine.
[22] Curran, J., Iyengar, S., Brink Lund, A., & Salovaara-Moring, I. (2009). Media system, public knowledge and democracy: A comparative study. European Journal of Communication, 24, 5-26. doi:10.1177/0267323108098943
[23] de Córdoba, J. (2012). Ecuador takes the stage with asylum offer. The Wall Street Journal.
[24] Dworkin, G. (1971). Paternalism. In R. Wasserstrom (Ed.), Morality and the law. Belmont: Wadsworth Pub. Co.
[25] Editorial Board (2012). Ecuador gambles on Wiki Leaks founder assange. Washington Post.
[26] El Comercio (2012). Diarios internacionales coinciden en que asilo a Assange es paradójico.
[27] EFE & El Universo (2012). Washington Post advierte que asilo a Assange podría traer consecuencias económicas desastrosas a Ecuador.
[28] The Economist (2012). An Ecuadorean history of the world.
[29] Fairness and Accuracy in Reporting (2002). US papers hail venezuelan coup as pro-democracy move.
[30] Fairness and Accuracy in Reporting (2007). Iraq and the media.
[31] Ferguson, T. (1995). Golden rule: The investment theory of party competition and the logic of money-driven political systems. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
[32] Fiss, O. (1986). Free speech and social structure. Yale Faculty Scholarship Series, 1210.
[33] Fiss, O. (1996) The irony of free speech. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
[34] Human Rights Watch (2011). Ecuador: A blow to free speech.
[35] Jones, B. (2007). Hugo! The Hugo Chávez story from mud hut to perpetual revolution. Hanover: Steerforth Press.
[36] Kane, R., Fischer, M., Pereboom, D., & Vargas, M. (2007). Four views on free will. Oxford: Blackwell.
[37] Kant, I. (2002/1785). Groundwork for the metaphysics of morals. In T. E. Hill Jr., & A. Zweig (Eds.), A. Zweig (Trans.), Groundwork for the metaphysics of morals. New York: Oxford University Press.
[38] Kenney, K. (2004). How free is the press in Ecuador? Public Library of US Diplomacy.
[39] Kornblith, H. (1993). Our native inferential tendencies. In A. Goldman (Ed.), Readings in philosophy and cognitive science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
[40] Kornbluh, P. (2003). The Pinochet File: A dossier of atrocity and accountability. Washington DC: National Security Archive.
[41] Lacunza, S., & Becerra, M. (2012). Wiki Media Leaks. Buenos Aires: Ediciones B.
[42] Lagos, C. (2009). El diario de Agustín: Cinco estudios de caso sobre El Mercurio y los derechos humanos. Santiago: Lom Ediciones.
[43] Lessig, L. (2011). Republic, lost: How money corrupts congress and a plan to stop it. New York: Twelve.
[44] Levitt, J. (2010). Confronting the impact of Citizens United. Yale Law and Policy Review, 29, 217-234.
[45] Mackie, G. (2003). Democracy defended. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511490293
[46] Madison, J. (1833/1834). Memorandum on “majority Government”. In G. Hunt (Ed.), The writings of James Madison.
[47] Madison, J. (1822). Letter to W. T. Barry. August 4.
[48] Martin, B. (2003). The Legacy of the Pentagon Papers. The Whistle, 34, 11.
[49] McCoy, D. (1989). Last of the fathers: James Madison and the republican Legacy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
[50] McLean, A., Shane, S., & Tse, A. (2011). Analyzing a coup in Honduras. New York Times, 19 June 2011.
[51] Meller, P. (2000). The Unidad Popular and the Pinochet dictatorship: A political economy analysis. London: Palgrave Macmillan. doi:10.1057/9780230523951
[52] Mill, J. S. (1789/1975). On liberty. In Mary Warnock (Ed.), Utilitarianism (126-250). Glasgow: Collins/Fontana.
[53] Monckeberg, M. (2009). Los magnates de la prensa. Santiago: Debate.
[54] Munoz, R. (2011). Muchedumbre 30S. Quito: Video Documental.
[55] Naiman, R. (2010). Wiki Leaks Honduras: State Department Busted on Support of Coup. Huffington Post, 29 November 2010.
[56] Naureckas, J. (2011). When journalism becomes terrorism. Fairness and Accuracy in Reporting.
[57] Palacio, E. (2011). NO a las mentiras. El Universo.
[58] Palacios, A. (2004). Puente Llaguno: Claves de una masacre. Caracas: PanaFilms.
[59] Paz y Mino, I. (2011). Falsos positivos: Visiones del 30S en cuatro periódicos Ecuatorianos. Quito: Pontificia Universidad Católica de Ecuador.
[60] Pettit, P. (1997). Republicanism: A theory of freedom and government. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
[61] Pettit, P. (2009). Law and liberty. In S. Besson, & J. L. Martí (Eds.), Law and republicanism. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199559169.003.0002
[62] Ramachandran, V. S. (1992). Filling in the blind spot. Nature, 356, 115. doi:10.1038/356115a0
[63] Regenwetter, M., Davis-Stober, C., & Dana, J. (2011). Transitivity of preferences. Psychological Review, 118, 42-56. doi:10.1037/a0021150
[64] Rowbottom, J. (2010). Democracy distorted. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
[65] Rousseau, J. (1762/2008). The social contract. New York: Cosimo, Inc.
[66] Russell, B. (1918/2002). Proposed roads to freedom. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University.
[67] Toobin, J. (2002). Too close to call. New York: Random House.
[68] Scanlon, T. (1972). A theory of freedom of expression. Philosophy and Public Affairs, 1, 204-226.
[69] Scanlon, T. (1979). Freedom of expression and the categories of expression. Pittsburgh Law Review, 40, 519-550
[70] Sen, A. (1999). Development as freedom. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
[71] Shapiro, I. (2003a). The state of democratic theory. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
[72] Shapiro, I. (2003b). The moral foundations of politics. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press
[73] Shapiro, I. (2011). The real world of democratic theory. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
[74] Shapiro, I. (2012). On non-domination. University of Toronto Law Journal, 62, 293-336.
[75] Stiglitz, J. (1999). On liberty, the right to know, and public discourse: The role of transparency in public life. Oxford Amnesty Lecture.
[76] Stiglitz, J. (2000). The contributions of the economics of information to Twentieth Century economics. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 115, 1441-1478. doi:10.1162/003355300555015
[77] Tangian, A. (2000). Unlikelihood of Condorcet’s paradox in a large society. Social Choice and Welfare, 17, 337-365. doi:10.1007/s003550050024
[78] Tversky, A. (1969). Intransitivity of preference. Psychological Review, 76, 31-48. doi:10.1037/h0026750
[79] El Universo (2012). NO a las mentiras se reproduce en varios medios de América Latina.
[80] Vargas Llosa, M. (2012). Julián Assange en el balcón. El País.
[81] Washington Post (2011). Ecuador’s autocrat cracks down on media freedom. 28 July 2011.
[82] Weisbrot, M., & Ray, R. (2011). The scorecard on development, 19602010: Closing the gap? Washington DC: Center for Economic and Policy Research.
[83] Wiki Leaks (2010). Collateral murder.
[84] World Public Opinion (2004). Americans continue to believe Iraq supported Al-Qaeda, had WMD.
[85] World Public Opinion (2006). Percentage of Americans believing Iraq had weapons of mass destruction rises.

comments powered by Disqus

Copyright © 2020 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.