Share This Article:

Evaluation of Broadleaf Tree Diversity at the Basin Scale—In Case of Artificial Chamaecyparis obtusa Forests

Abstract Full-Text HTML Download Download as PDF (Size:494KB) PP. 62-65
DOI: 10.4236/ojf.2013.32010    3,320 Downloads   5,115 Views   Citations

ABSTRACT

In recent years, the various functions required of forests, especially the conservation of biodiversity, have been attracting increasing attention in Japan and worldwide. In Japan, 67% of national land is covered by forest, 41% of which is artificial forest (i.e., plantations). Therefore, forest biodiversity conservation efforts should also target artificial forests. In this paper, we seek to promote sustainable forest management that considers biodiversity conservation by examining indices that can be used by forest managers to evaluate the diversity of broadleaf trees. The result was that evaluation of broadleaf tree diversity in artificial forests at a basin scale was possible by combining several types of indicators.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Cite this paper

Kosaka, S. & Yamada, Y. (2013). Evaluation of Broadleaf Tree Diversity at the Basin Scale—In Case of Artificial Chamaecyparis obtusa Forests. Open Journal of Forestry, 3, 62-65. doi: 10.4236/ojf.2013.32010.

References

[1] Forest, H. (2011) Forest of Ootaga-the forest of FSC and a museum of forest and Owari Hinoki4 p.
[2] The Forest Agency (2012). Proportion of forest and artificial forest within prefectural lands. URL (checked on 24 January 2012). http://www.rinya.maff.go.jp/j/keikaku/genkyou/sinrin_ritu.html
[3] Yoshida, T., & Tanaka, K. (2005). Land-use diversity index: A new means of detecting diversity at landscape level. Landscape and Ecological Engineering, 1, 201-206.
[4] The Meteorological Agency (2012). An online search of the data of past weather. URL (checked at 1 January 2012). http://www.data.jma.go.jp/obd/stats/etrn/index.php
[5] Yoshiaki, I., & Kazunori, S. (2002). Problems around the indices of species diversity for comparison of different communities. Landscape and Ecological Engineering, 53, 204-220.

  
comments powered by Disqus

Copyright © 2020 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.