Span of Attention across Stages of Intellectual Impairment: Does Affective Stimulation Matter?

Abstract

The present study explores how affectivity and abstraction value influences the span of attention of normal and retarded population. Five intellectual functioning groups were chosen, six in each (N = 30), from both sexes, age of 11 - 23 (mean age 17.36) years from the urban hospitals and educational institutions. For standardization of stimulus materials and controlling of extraneous variables three preliminary experiments were done. A repeated measure experimental design was followed in the main study. Result shows attention span tends to decrease with an increment in abstraction level in the lower range of intellectual ladder. Affective loading in stimulus materials does not enhance the span of attention, per se it inhibits cognition. The result was interpreted in the light of behavioural observation during the experimental conditions as well as the obtained statistical output. Overall analysis revealed that the persons with moderate retardation scored better in attention span in comparison to mild retarded group where average group scored highest. So, the result of span of attention did not follow the ladder of intellectual impairment. The causal attribution on result was interpreted in terms of environmental distraction and the lack of basic cognitive need of the moderately retarded persons which inversely facilitated better attention span as their attention span remains unaffected by distraction. The result is helpful to design the learning materials for the specific intellectual group.

Share and Cite:

Chakrabarti, A. & Banerjee, M. (2013). Span of Attention across Stages of Intellectual Impairment: Does Affective Stimulation Matter?. Psychology, 4, 410-419. doi: 10.4236/psych.2013.44058.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

[1] Anderson, A. K. (2005). Affective influences on the attentional dynamics supporting awareness. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 134, 258-281. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.134.2.258
[2] Anthony, J. S. (2004). Affection and attention: On the phenomenology of becoming aware. Continental Philosophy Review, 37, 21-43. doi:10.1023/B:MAWO.0000049298.44397.be
[3] Brooks, P. H., & McCauley, C. (1984). Cognitive research in mental retardation. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 88, 479-486.
[4] Craik, F. I., & Masani, P. A. (1969). Age and intelligence differences in coding and retrieval of word lists. British Journal of Psychology, 60, 315-319. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8295.1969.tb01202.x
[5] Crosby, K. G., & Blatt, B. (1968). Attention and mental retardation. Journal of Education, 150, 67-81.
[6] Darwin, C. (1872). On the expression of emotions in men and animals. London: John Murray. doi:10.1037/10001-000
[7] Denny, M. R. (1964). Learning and performance. In H. A. Stevens, & R. Heber (Eds.), Mental retardation: A review of research (pp. 100-142). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
[8] Denny, M. R. (1966). A theoretical analysis and its application to training the retarded. In N. R. Ellis (Ed.), International review of research in mental retardation (pp. 1-27). New York: Academic Press. doi:10.1016/S0074-7750(08)60201-3
[9] Desimone, R., & Duncan, J. (1995). Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 18, 193-222. doi:10.1146/annurev.ne.18.030195.001205
[10] Drew, C. J., Jardman, M., & Logan, D. R. (1996). Mental retardation. A life cycle approach (6th ed.). London: Prentice Hall.
[11] Drew, C. J., Hardman, M. L., & Hart, A. W. (1996). Designing and conducting research in education and social science. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
[12] Dolan, R. J. (2002). Emotion, cognition, and behavior. Review Neuroscience and Psychology, 298, 1191-1194.
[13] Goleman, D. P. (1995). Emotional intelligence: Why it can matter more than IQ for character, health and lifelong achievement. New York: Bantam Books.
[14] Hadley, C. B., & Mackay, D. G. (2006). Does emotion help or hinder immediate memory? Arousal versus priority-binding mechanisms. Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning, Memory, Cognition, 32, 79-88. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.32.1.79
[15] Hinojosa, J. A., Martín-Loeches, M., Fernández-Frías, C., & Rubia, F. J. (2001). Functional differences in the semantic processing of concrete and abstract words. Neuropsychologia, 39, 1086-1096. doi:10.1016/S0028-3932(01)00033-1
[16] Howe, M. L., & Hunter, M. A. (1985). Adult age differences in storage-retrieval processes: A stages-of-learning analysis of developmental interactions in concreteness effects. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 39, 130-150. doi:10.1037/h0080119
[17] Hutt, M. L., & Gibby, R. G. (1965). The mentally retarded child (2nd ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
[18] Lazarus, R. S. (1991). Cognition and motivation in emotion. American Psychologist, 46, 352-367. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.46.4.352
[19] Luria, A. R. (1963). The mentally retarded child. Oxford: Pergamon.
[20] Moore, D. G. (2001). Reassessing emotion recognition performance in people with mental retardation: A review. American Journal on Mental Retardation, 106, 481-502. doi:10.1352/0895-8017(2001)106<0481:RERPIP>2.0.CO;2
[21] Paivio, A. (1971). Imagery and verbal processes. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.
[22] Paivio, A. (1986). Mental representations: A dual coding approach. New York: Oxford University Press.
[23] Richardson, J. (2003). Dual coding versus relational processing in memory for concrete and abstract words. European Journal of Cognitive psychology, 15, 481-509. doi:10.1080/09541440244000256
[24] Rojahn, J., Rabold, D. E., & Schneider, F. (1995). Emotion specificity in mental retardation. American Journal on Mental Retardation, 99, 477-486.
[25] Siegel, S., & Castellan, N. J. (1988). Nonparametric statistics for the behavioral sciences. New York: McGraw-Hill.
[26] Simon, H. A. (1967). Motivational and emotional controls of cognition. Psychological Review, 74, 29-39. doi:10.1037/h0024127
[27] Schwanenflugel, P. J., & Stowe, R. W. (1989). Context availability and the processing of abstract and concrete words in sentences. Reading Research Quarterly, 24, 114-126. doi:10.2307/748013
[28] Strack, F., & Deutsch, R. (2004). Reflective and impulsive determinants of social behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8, 220-247. doi:10.1207/s15327957pspr0803_1
[29] Talmi, D., Anderson, A. K., Riggs, L., Caplan, J. B., & Moscovitch M. (2007). Immediate memory consequences of the effect of emotion on attention to pictures. Learning and Memory, 15, 172-182. doi:10.1101/lm.722908
[30] Waring, J. D., Payne, J. D., & Kensinger, E. A. (2010). Impact of individual differences upon emotion induced memory trade-offs. Cognition & Emotion, 24, 150-167. doi:10.1080/02699930802618918
[31] Zeaman, D., & House, B. J. (1963). The role of attention in retardate discrimination learning. In N. R. Ellis (Ed.), Handbook of mental deficiency (pp. 159-223). New York: McGraw-Hill.
[32] Zigler, E. (1966). Personality structure in the retardate. In N. R. Ellis (Ed.), International review of research in mental retardation (pp. 77-108). New York: Academic Press.

Copyright © 2024 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.