Share This Article:

Semantic-Communicative Structure and Word Order in Mandarin Chinese

Abstract Full-Text HTML Download Download as PDF (Size:469KB) PP. 79-86
DOI: 10.4236/ojml.2013.31010    4,632 Downloads   7,399 Views   Citations

ABSTRACT

In some languages more than in others, communicative considerations—such as what a message is about, what information is new or old, and whether this or that participant is in the Speaker’s focus of attention—constrain the structure of a sentence. The goal of the present paper is to describe how different Semantic-Communicative Structures affect word order in simple mono-transitive sentences without coverbs or adverbial phrases in Mandarin Chinese. The discussion is couched in the Meaning-Text framework, relevant parts of which are clarified at the onset of the paper. We argue that Subject-Verb-Object (SVO) sentences are communicatively unmarked in that they do not signal any particular communicative consideration. Other word orders, however, specifically encode certain communicative considerations. This is the case of Prolepsisi-Subjecti-Verb-Object (PiSiVO) and Object-Subject-Verb (OSV) sentences, which are discussed here.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Cite this paper

Tremblay, A. & Beck, D. (2013). Semantic-Communicative Structure and Word Order in Mandarin Chinese. Open Journal of Modern Linguistics, 3, 79-86. doi: 10.4236/ojml.2013.31010.

References

[1] Beck, D. (2002). The typology of parts of speech systems: The markedness of adjectives. New York and London: Routledge.
[2] Chao, Y.-R. (1968). A grammar of spoken Chinese. Berkeley and Los Angeles, CA: University of California Press.
[3] Chen, C.-F. (2004). Asymmetrical behaviors of presuppositions of lianconstructions in Chinese. Unpublished Manuscript. https://webspace.utexas.edu/cfchen/NACCL16_chen2004.pdf.
[4] Dik, S. C. (1981). Functional grammar. Dordrecht and Cinnaminson: Foris.
[5] Hu, W. (1995). Functional perspectives and Chinese word order. Ph.D. Dissertation, Columbus: Ohio State University.
[6] Lambrecht, K. (1994). Information structure and sentence form: Topic, focus, and the mental representation of discourse referents. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511620607
[7] LaPolla, R. J. (1988). Topicalization and the question of lexical passives in Chinese. Third Annual Conference on Chinese Linguistics, 13-14 May 1988, Columbus: Ohio State University.
[8] LaPolla, R. J. (1993). Arguments against “subject” and “direct object” as viable concepts in Chinese. Bulletin of the Institute of History and Philology, 63, 759-813.
[9] LaPolla, R. J. (1995). Pragmatic relations and word order in Chinese. In P. Dowing, & M. Noonan (Eds.), Word order in discourse (pp. 297-329). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
[10] Li, C. N., & Thompson, S. A. (1975). The semantic function of word order: A case study in Mandarin. In C. N. Li (Ed.), Word order and word order change (pp.163-195). Austin and London: University of Texas Press.
[11] Li, C. N., & Thompson, S. A. (1976). Subject and topic: A new typology of language. In C. N. Li (Ed.), Subject and topic (pp. 457-489). New York: Academic Press.
[12] Li, C. N., & Thompson, S. A. (1989). Mandarin Chinese: A functional reference grammar. London and New York: University of California Press.
[13] Li, P., Bates, E., Liu, H., & McWhinney, B. (1992). Cues as functional constraints on sentence processing in Chinese. In C. Hsuan-Chih, & A. J. L. Tzeng (Eds.), Language processing in Chinese (pp. 207-233). Amsterdam: North-Holland. doi:10.1016/S0166-4115(08)61893-2
[14] Li, W. (2005). Topic chains in Chinese: A discourse analysis and applications in language teaching. Muenchen: Lincom Europa.
[15] Melcuk, I. A. (1988). Dependency syntax: Theory and practice. New York: SUNY Press.
[16] Melcuk, I. A. (2001). Communicative organization in natural language: The Semantic-Communicative structure of sentences. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
[17] Po-Ching, Y., & Rimmington, D. (2004). Chinese: A comprehensive grammar. New York and London: Routledge.
[18] Shyu, S. I. (2004). (A)symetries between Mandarin Chinese lian…dou and shenzhi. Journal of Chinese Linguistics, 32, 81-128.
[19] Smith, C. (1991). Sentences in text: A valediction for sentence topic. In C. Georgopolous, & R. Ishihara (Eds.), Interdisciplinary approaches to language (Essays in Honour of S.-Y. Kuroda) (pp. 545-564). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Press. doi:10.1007/978-94-011-3818-5_29
[20] Tremblay, A., & Beck, D. (2007). Word order in Mandarin Chinese intransitive clauses. In K. Gerdes, T. Reuther, & L. Wanner (Eds.), In Meaning-Text Theory 2007. Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Meaning-Text Theory (pp. 417-426). München and Wien: Wiener Slawistischer Almanach.
[21] Van Valin Jr., R. D., & LaPolla, R. J. (1997). Syntax. Structure, Meaning and Function. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9781139166799
[22] Wang, X. (2008). The semantics and pragmatics of lian … dou/ye, lian, dou, and ye. In M. K. M. Chan, & H. Kang (Eds.), Proceedings of the 20th North American Conference on Chinese Linguistics (NACCL20). Volume 2 (pp. 875-891). Columbus: The Ohio State University.
[23] Wei, H. M. (1989). Word order of Mandarin Chinese. Ph.D. Dissertation. East Lansing, MI: Michigan State University.
[24] Zhang, N. (2000). Object shift in Mandarin Chinese. Journal of Chinese Linguistics, 28, 201-246.
[25] Zolkovskij, A., & Melcuk, I. A. (1967). O semanticeskom sinteze [On semantic synthesis]. Problemy Kybernetiki, 19, 177-238. [French translation: T.A. Information (1970), 2, 1-85].

  
comments powered by Disqus

Copyright © 2019 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.