Small RNAs and Transgenerational Epigenetic Variation

DOI: 10.4236/ajps.2013.43082   PDF   HTML   XML   3,868 Downloads   5,854 Views   Citations


Small RNAs are found in eukaryotes and are responsible for regulation of chromatin structure, RNA processing and stability, translation and transcription. 24-nt small interfering RNA (siRNA) are known to mediate gene inactivation via the RNA-directed DNA methylation pathway (RdDM) and are important for natural heritable changes in plant species. DNA cytosine methylation can be maintained between generations and this may be important for accelerated adaption to stress conditions. Research is currently focused toward the epigenetic response to disease, the stability of DNA methylation over generations, the elucidation of newly discovered pathways for de novo DNA methylation, and the application of epigenetic variation to breeding programs. This review aims to give a brief but comprehensive examination on small RNAs and transgenerational epigenetic variation.

Share and Cite:

J. Lee, Z. Duxbury and M. Wang, "Small RNAs and Transgenerational Epigenetic Variation," American Journal of Plant Sciences, Vol. 4 No. 3, 2013, pp. 641-646. doi: 10.4236/ajps.2013.43082.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.


[1] J. Bender, “DNA Methylation and Epigenetics,” Annual Review of Plant Biology, Vol. 55, 2004, pp. 41-68. doi:10.1146/annurev.arplant.55.031903.141641
[2] F. Johannes, et al., “Assessing the Impact of Transgenerational Epigenetic Variation on Complex Traits,” Plos Genetics, Vol. 5, No. 6, 2009, Article ID: e1000530. doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1000530
[3] V. Pavet, et al., “Arabidopsis Displays Centromeric DNA Hypomethylation and Cytological Alterations of Heterochromatin upon Attack by Pseudomonas syringae,” Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions, Vol. 19, No. 6, 2006, pp. 577-587. doi:10.1094/MPMI-19-0577
[4] R. W. Carthew and E. J. Sontheimer, “Origins and Mechanisms of miRNAs and siRNAs,” Cell, Vol. 136, No. 4, 2009, pp. 642-655. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2009.01.035
[5] A. Eamens, et al., “RNA Silencing in Plants: Yesterday, Today, and Tomorrow,” Plant Physiology, Vol. 147, No. 2, 2008, pp. 456-468. doi:10.1104/pp.108.117275
[6] S. Lahmy, et al., “PolV(PolIVb) Function in RNA-Directed DNA Methylation Requires the Conserved Active Site and an Additional Plant-Specific Subunit,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, Vol. 106, No. 3, 2009, pp. 941-946. doi:10.1073/pnas.0810310106
[7] J. A. Brusslan, et al., “Genome-Wide Evaluation of Histone Methylation Changes Associated with Leaf Senescence in Arabidopsis,” Plos One, Vol. 7, No. 3, 2012, Article ID: e33151. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0033151
[8] A. Bilichak, et al., “The Progeny of Arabidopsis thaliana Plants Exposed to Salt Exhibit Changes in DNA Methylation, Histone Modifications and Gene Expression,” Plos One, Vol. 7, No. 1, 2012, Article ID: e30515. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0030515
[9] C. Lang-Mladek, et al., “Transgenerational Inheritance and Resetting of Stress-Induced Loss of Epigenetic Gene Silencing in Arabidopsis,” Molecular Plant, Vol. 3, No. 3, 2010, pp. 594-602. doi:10.1093/mp/ssq014
[10] J.-M. Kim, et al., “Chromatin Regulation Functions in Plant Abiotic Stress Responses,” Plant Cell and Environment, Vol. 33, No. 4, 2010, pp. 604-611. doi:10.1111/j.1365-3040.2009.02076.x
[11] I. Ausin, et al., “INVOLVED IN DE NOVO 2-Containing Complex Involved in RNA-Directed DNA Methylation in Arabidopsis,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, Vol. 109, No. 22, 2012, pp. 8374-8381. doi:10.1073/pnas.1206638109
[12] M. Xie, et al., “A Subgroup of SGS3-Like Proteins Act Redundantly in RNA-Directed DNA Methylation,” Nucleic Acids Research, Vol. 40, No. 10, 2012, pp. 4422-4431. doi:10.1093/nar/gks034
[13] S. J. Cokus, et al., “Shotgun Bisulphite Sequencing of the Arabidopsis Genome Reveals DNA Methylation Patterning,” Nature, Vol. 452, No. 7184, 2008, pp. 215-219. doi:10.1038/nature06745
[14] D. Zilberman, et al., “Genome-Wide Analysis of Arabidopsis Thaliana DNA Methylation Uncovers an Interdependence between Methylation and Transcription,” Nature Genetics, Vol. 39, No. 1, 2007, pp. 61-69. doi:10.1038/ng1929
[15] X. Zhang, et al., “Genome-Wide High-Resolution Mapping and Functional Analysis of DNA Methylation in Arabidopsis,” Cell, Vol. 126, No. 6, 2006, pp. 1189-1201. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2006.08.003
[16] J. Reinders, et al., “Genome-Wide, High-Resolution DNA Methylation Profiling Using Bisulfate-Mediated Cytosine Conversion,” Genome Research, Vol. 18, No. 3, 2008, pp. 469-476. doi:10.1101/gr.7073008
[17] H. Saze, O. M. Scheid and J. Paszkowski, “Maintenance of CpG Methylation Is Essential for Epigenetic Inheritance during Plant Gametogenesis,” Nature Genetics, Vol. 34, No. 1, 2003, pp. 65-69. doi:10.1038/ng1138
[18] L. Bartee, F. Malagnac and J. Bender, “Arabidopsis cmt3 Chromomethylase Mutations Block Non-CG Methylation and Silencing of an Endogenous Gene,” Genes & Development, Vol. 15, No. 14, 2001, pp. 1753-1758. doi:10.1101/gad.905701
[19] J. P. Jackson, et al., “Control of CpNpG DNA Methylation by the KRYPTONITE Histone H3 Methyltransferase,” Nature, Vol. 416, No. 6880, 2002, pp. 556-560. doi:10.1038/nature731
[20] F. Malagnac, L. Bartee and J. Bender, “An Arabidopsis SET Domain Protein Required for Maintenance but Not Establishment of DNA Methylation,” Embo Journal, Vol. 21, No. 24, 2002, pp. 6842-6852. doi:10.1093/emboj/cdf687
[21] A. Miura, et al., “An Arabidopsis jmjC Domain Protein Protects Transcribed Genes from DNA Methylation at CHG Sites,” Embo Journal, Vol. 28, No. 8, 2009, pp. 1078-1086. doi:10.1038/emboj.2009.59
[22] W. Aufsatz, et al., “The Role of MET1 in RNA-Directed De Novo and Maintenance Methylation of CG Dinucleotides,” Plant Molecular Biology, Vol. 54, No. 6, 2004, pp. 793-804. doi:10.1007/s11103-004-0179-1
[23] E. V. Dolgosheina, et al., “Conifers Have a Unique Small RNA Silencing Signature,” RNA—A Publication of the RNA Society, Vol. 14, No. 8, 2008, pp. 1508-1515. doi:10.1261/rna.1052008
[24] R. D. Morin, et al., “Comparative Analysis of the Small RNA Transcriptomes of Pinus contorta and Oryza sativa,” Genome Research, Vol. 18, No. 4, 2008, pp. 571-584. doi:10.1101/gr.6897308
[25] T. Sasaki, et al., “RNAi-Independent De Novo DNA Methylation Revealed in Arabidopsis Mutants of Chromatin Remodeling Gene DDM1,” Plant Journal, Vol. 70, No. 5, 2012, pp. 750-758. doi:10.1111/j.1365-313X.2012.04911.x
[26] J. Reinders, et al., “Compromised Stability of DNA Methylation and Transposon Immobilization in Mosaic Arabidopsis epigenomes,” Genes & Development, Vol. 23, No. 8, 2009, pp. 939-950. doi:10.1101/gad.524609
[27] F. K. Teixeira, et al., “A Role for RNAi in the Selective Correction of DNA Methylation Defects,” Science, Vol. 323, No. 5921, 2009, pp. 1600-1604. doi:10.1126/science.1165313
[28] R. J. Schmitz, et al., “Transgenerational Epigenetic Instability Is a Source of Novel Methylation Variants,” Science, Vol. 334, No. 6054, 2011, pp. 369-373. doi:10.1126/science.1212959
[29] D. L. Hartl and E. W. Jones, “GENETICS Analysis of Genes and Genomes,” 6th Edition, Jones and Bartlett Publishers, Sudbury, 2005, p. 854.
[30] J.-M. Kim, et al., “Alterations of Lysine Modifications on the Histone H3 N-Tail under Drought Stress Conditions in Arabidopsis thaliana,” Plant and Cell Physiology, Vol. 49, No. 10, 2008, pp. 1580-1588. doi:10.1093/pcp/pcn133
[31] P. Casati, et al., “Histone Acetylation and Chromatin Remodeling Are Required for UV-B-Dependent Transcriptional Activation of Regulated Genes in Maize,” Plant Cell, Vol. 20, No. 4, 2008, pp. 827-842. doi:10.1105/tpc.107.056457
[32] M. Jaskiewicz, U. Conrath and C. Peterhaensel, “Chromatin Modification Acts as a Memory for Systemic Acquired Resistance in the Plant Stress Response,” Embo Reports, Vol. 12, No. 1, 2011, pp. 50-55. doi:10.1038/embor.2010.186
[33] V. Latzel, et al., “Epigenetic Variation in Plant Responses to Defence Hormones,” Annals of Botany, Vol. 110, No. 7, 2012, pp. 1423-1428. doi:10.1093/aob/mcs088
[34] E. Luna, et al., “Next-Generation Systemic Acquired Resistance,” Plant Physiology, Vol. 158, No. 2, 2012, pp. 844-853. doi:10.1104/pp.111.187468
[35] M. Hauben, et al., “Energy Use Efficiency Is Characterized by an Epigenetic Component That Can Be Directed through Artificial Selection to Increase Yield,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, Vol. 106, No. 47, 2009, pp. 20109-20114.

comments powered by Disqus

Copyright © 2020 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.