Assessing Respondent Driven Sampling for Network Studies in Ethnographic Contexts

Kirk Dombrowski, Bilal Khan, Joshua Moses, Emily Channell, Evan Misshula

.

DOI: 10.4236/aa.2013.31001                

Abstract

Respondent Driven Sampling (RDS) is generally considered a methodology for recruiting “hard-to-reach” populations for social science research. More recently, Wejnert has argued that RDS analysis can be used for general social network analysis as well (where he labels it, RDS-SN). In this article, we assess the value of Wejnert’s RDS-SN for use in more traditional ethnographic contexts. We employed RDS as part of a larger social network research project to recruit n = 330 community residents (over 17 years of age) in Nain, a predominantly (92%) aboriginal community in northern Labrador, Canada, for social network interviews about food sharing, housing, public health, and community traditions. The peer referral chains resulted in a sample that was then analyzed for its representativeness by two means—a comparison with the Statistics Canada 2006 Census of the same community, and with house-by-house demographic surveys carried out in the community as part of our research. The results show a close fit with available community statistics and our own survey. As such, we argue that the RDS sampling used in Nain was able to provide a useful and near-representative sample of the community. To demonstrate the usefulness of the results, the referral chains are also analyzed here for patterns in intragroup and intergroup relationships that were apparent only in the aggregate.

Keywords

Respondent Driven Sampling; Labrador Inuit; Ethnographic Methods; Network Sampling; Arctic Social Science

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

[1]	Ben-Dor, S. (1977). Inuit-settler relations in Makkovik, 1962. In R. Paine (Ed.), The White Arctic: Anthropological essays on tutelage and ethnicity, (pp. 306-325). St. Johns: Memorial University of Newfoundland.
[2]	Bernier, R. (1997). The dimensions of wage inequality among aboriginal peoples. Business and Labour Market Analysis, 109. Ottawa.
[3]	Brantenberg, T. (1977a). Ethnic values and ethnic recruitment in Nain. In R. Paine (Ed.), The White Arctic: Anthropological essays on tutelage and ethnicity (pp. 326-343). St. Johns: Memorial University of Newfoundland.
[4]	Brantenberg, T. (1977b). Ethnic commitments and local government in Nain, 1969-76. In R. Paine (Ed.), The White Arctic: Anthropological essays on tutelage and ethnicity (pp. 376-410). St. Johns: Memorial University of Newfoundland.
[5]	Dombrowski, K. (2002). The praxis of indigenism. American Anthropologist, 104, 1062-1073. doi:10.1525/aa.2002.104.4.1062
[6]	Dombrowski, K. (2007). Lifestyle and livelihood: Culture politics and Alaska native subsistence. Anthropologica: The Journal of the Canadian Anthropology Society, 49, 211-230.
[7]	Dombrowski, K., Khan, B., Moses, J., Channell, E., & Curtis, R. (2012) The Nain networks project. A Research Brief to the Nunatsiavut Research Committee. http://snrg-nyc.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/Nain_Brief_final.pdf
[8]	Dombrowski, K., Khan, B., Moses, J., Channell, E., & Curtis, R. (forthcoming). Sampling Social Divisions in a Rural Inuit Community. Identities.
[9]	Gile, K. J., & Handcock, M. S. (2010). Respondent-driven sampling: An assessment of current methodology. Sociological Methodology, 40, 285-327. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9531.2010.01223.x
[10]	Goel, S., & Salganik, M. J. (2009). Respondent-driven sampling as Markov chain Monte Carlo. Statistics in Medicine, 28, 2202-2229. doi:10.1002/sim.3613
[11]	Goel, S., & Salganik, M. J. (2010). Assessing respondent-driven sampling. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107, 67436747. doi:10.1073/pnas.1000261107
[12]	Heckathorn, D. (1997). Respondent-driven sampling: A new approach to the study of hidden populations. Social Problems, 44, 174-199. doi:10.2307/3096941
[13]	Heckathorn, D. (2002a). Respondent-driven sampling II: Deriving valid population estimates from chain-referral samples of hidden populations. Social Problems, 39, 11-34. doi:10.1525/sp.2002.49.1.11
[14]	Heckathorn, D. (2002b). Development of a theory of collective action: From the emergence of norms to AIDS prevention and the analysis of social structure. In J. Berger, & M. Zelditch (Eds.), New directions in sociological theory: Growth of contemporary theories. New York: Rowman and Littlefield.
[15]	Heckathorn, D. (2007). Extensions of respondent-driven sampling: Analyzing continuous variables and controlling for differential recruitment. Sociological Methodology, 37, 151-208. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9531.2007.00188.x
[16]	Heckathorn, D., & Jeffri, J. (2001). Finding the beat: Using respondent-driven sampling to study jazz musicians. Poetics, 28, 307-329. doi:10.1016/S0304-422X(01)80006-1
[17]	Heckathorn, D., Salaam S., Broadhead, R. S., & Hughes, J. J. (2002). Extensions of respondent-driven sampling: A new approach to the study of injection drug users aged 18-25. AIDS and Behavior, 13, 55-67. doi:10.1023/A:1014528612685
[18]	Hicks, J. (2004). On the application of theories of “internal colonialism” to Inuit societies. Annual Conference of the Canadian Political Science Association, Winnipeg, 3-5 June 2004.
[19]	Kennedy, J. C. (1977). Local government and ethnic boundaries in Makkovik, 1972. In R. Paine (Ed.), The White Arctic: Anthropological essays on tutelage and ethnicity, (pp. 359-375). St. Johns: Memorial University of Newfoundland.
[20]	Kennedy, J. C. (1982). Holding the line: Ethnic boundaries in a northern labrador community. Social and Economic Studies, 27. St John’s: Memorial University Institute of Social and Economic Research.
[21]	Maxim, P. S., Beavon, D., & Whitehead, P. C., (2001). Dispersion and polarization of income among aboriginal and non-aboriginal Canadians. Canadian Review of Sociology, 389, 465-476.
[22]	Prattis, J. I., & Chartrand, J.-P, (1990). The cultural division of labour in the Canadian north. The Canadian Review of Sociology and Anthropology, 27, 49-73. doi:10.1111/j.1755-618X.1990.tb00444.x
[23]	RDSAT 6.0.1 (2007). http://www.respondentdrivensampling.org/
[24]	Salganik, M. J., & Heckathorn, D. (2004). Sampling and estimation in hidden populations using respondent-driven sampling. Sociological Methodology, 35, 193-238. doi:10.1111/j.0081-1750.2004.00152.x
[25]	Salganik, M. J. (2006). Confidence intervals, design effects, and sample size calculation for respondent-driven sampling. Journal of Urban Health, 83, 98-11. doi:10.1007/s11524-006-9106-x
[26]	Semaan, S., Jennifer, L., & Liebman, J. (2002). Street and network sampling in evaluation studies of HIV risk-reduction interventions. AIDS Review, 4, 213-223.
[27]	Statistics Canada (2006). http://www.statcan.gc.ca/pub/81-595-m/81-595-m2009078-eng.htm
[28]	Tanner, A., & Henderson, S. (1992). Aboriginal land claims in the Atlantic provinces. In Coates, K. (Ed.), Aboriginal land claims in Canada (pp. 131-165). Toronto: Copp Clark Pitman Ltd.
[29]	Wejnert, C., Heckathorn, D., Ramirez-Valles, J., & Diaz, R. M. (2010). The dual homophily model: Disentangling the effects of affiliation preference and differential degree on homophily. Annual Meeting of the American Sociological Association Annual Meeting, Sheraton Boston and the Boston Marriott Copley Place, Boston, 30 May 2011. http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p241120_index.html
[30]	Wejnert, C. (2010). Social network analysis with respondent-driven sampling data: A study of racial integration on campus. Social Networks, 32, 112-124. doi:10.1016/j.socnet.2009.09.002