A Critique of Atheistic Humanism in the Quest for Human Dignity


A challenge confronting the human person in contemporary society is the abuse to his personality which constitutes a bane to his dignity and well-being which has continued to be on the increase despite various theoretical attempts at addressing the issue of abuse to human dignity. One of such theoretical attempts, which is atheistic humanism, has failed in its quest to enhancing the dignity of man because it has neglected the theistic background necessary for understanding, relating to and the treatment of the human person. This paper therefore, aims at a critical analysis of atheistic humanism in its quest for human dignity with a view to showing its implications for the dignity and well-being of man. The paper employs the critical method of philosophy with a view to showing the inconsistencies and the implications of an atheistic humanistic understanding of man. The paper thereafter states that a theistic humanistic understanding and treatment of the human person better provides the ground for the pursuit and realization of human dignity and well-being.

Share and Cite:

Obioha, P. (2013). A Critique of Atheistic Humanism in the Quest for Human Dignity. Open Journal of Philosophy, 3, 131-139. doi: 10.4236/ojpp.2013.31A022.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.


[1] Abbagnano, N. (1967). Humanism. In Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Vol. 4). New York: Macmillan and Free Press.
[2] Adler, M. (1973). The difference of man and the difference it makes. Downers Grove, IL: Intervarsity Press.
[3] Angeles, P. (1981). Dictionary of philosophy. New York: Harper & Row Publishers.
[4] Aquinas, T. (1892). Summa theologica (Vol. 1). Rome: Leonine.
[5] Brentano, F. (1969). The origin of our knowledge of right and wrong. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
[6] Dukor, M. (2010). Theistic humanism of African philosophy. Germany: LAMBERT Academic Publishing.
[7] Etuk, U. (1999). The new humanism. Uyo: Afahaide & Bros.
[8] Etuk, U. (2010). Moral personhood. In M. F. Asiegbu, & J. C. Chukwuokolo (Eds.), Personhood and personal identity: A philosophical study (pp. 3-14). Enugu: Nigeria Philosophical Association.
[9] Gass, W. (1967). The case of the obliging stranger. In M. Mandelbaum et al. (Eds.), Philosophic problems. New York: Macmillan.
[10] Geisler, N. (1982). Is man the measure: An evaluation of contemporary humanism. Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Book House.
[11] Gyekye, K. (1996). African cultural values: An introduction. Ghana: Sanfola publishing Co.
[12] Kurtz, P. (1973). Humanist manifesto I and II. Buffalo: NY Prometheus Books.
[13] Kurtz, P. (1973). The humanist alternative. London: Permberton Press.
[14] Kurtz, P. (2000). Embracing the power of humanism. New York: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers Inc.
[15] MacKay, D. (1979). Human science and human dignity. London: Hodder and Stoughton.
[16] McDowell, J. (1983). Handbook of today’s religions: Secular humanism. New York: Amazon Publishers.
[17] Niebuhr, R. (1941). The nature and destiny of man (Vol. 1). New York: Scribners.
[18] Pascal, B. (1894). Thoughts on religion and philosophy. Edinburgh: John Grant.
[19] Pascal, B. (1985) Pensees (No. 430). New York: Random House.
[20] Schwertley, B. (2006). Results of secular humanism. London: Heinemann.

Copyright © 2023 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.