Impacts of social desirability response bias on sexuality care of cancer patients among Chinese nurses

Abstract Full-Text HTML Download Download as PDF (Size:209KB) PP. 341-345
DOI: 10.4236/ojn.2012.24050    3,583 Downloads   6,233 Views   Citations

ABSTRACT

The purpose of this study was to detect social desirable response bias on Chinese nurses’ attitudes and beliefs toward sexuality care of cancer patients. A cross-sectional self-reported questionnaire based survey was used. Measures included a 12-item Inventory of Sexuality Attitude and Belief Survey (SABS) and a 10-item Marlowe-Crowne Social Desirability Scale. Total social desirability scores were significantly correlated with four individual items of the SABS, and significantly predicted the total SABS scores (β=﹣0.155, p= 0.028). Before controlling social desirability variable, nurses’ age, marital status, years of working experience, and working units were significantly correlated with total SABS scores. After controlling social desirability variable, only nurses’ age and working units were statistically significant predictors of SABS. Social desirable response bias had impacts on Chinese nurses’ attitudes and beliefs toward sexuality care of cancer patients. Study findings demonstrated that social desirable response bias would potentially jeopardize human sexuality assessment and counseling in nursing practice. Controlling social desirable response should consider using a social desirability scale to detect and control potential social desirability bias during data analysis.

Cite this paper

Li, D. , Hyde, A. and Zeng, Y. (2012) Impacts of social desirability response bias on sexuality care of cancer patients among Chinese nurses. Open Journal of Nursing, 2, 341-345. doi: 10.4236/ojn.2012.24050.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

[1] Petroczi, A. and Nepusz, T. (2011) Methodological considerations regarding response bias effect in substance use research: Is correlation between the measured variables sufficient? Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy, 6, 1. Hhttp://www.substanceabusepolicy.com/content/6/1/1
[2] Stuart, G.S. and Grimes, D.A. (2009) Social desirability bias in family planning studies: A neglected problem. Contraception, 80, 108-112. Hdoi:10.1016/j.contraception.2009.02.009
[3] Moshagen, M., Musch, J., Ostapczuk, M. and Zhao, Z. (2010) Reducing socially desirable responses in epidemiologic surveys: An extension of the randomized-response technique. Epidemiology, 21, 379-382. Hdoi:10.1097/EDE.0b013e3181d61dbc
[4] van de Mortel, T.F. (2008) Faking it: Social desirability response bias in self-report research. Australian Journal of Advanced Nursing, 25, 40-48.
[5] Verardi, S., Dahourou, D., Ah-Kion, J., Bhowon, U., Tseung, C.N., Amoussou-Yeye, D., Adjahouisso, M., Bouatta, C., Dougoumalé Cissé, D., Mbodji, M., Barry, O., Minga Minga, D., Ondongo, F., Tsokini, D., Rigozzi, C., Meyer de Stadelhofen, F. and Rossier, J. (2010) Psychometric properties of the Marlowe-Crowne social desirability scale in eight African countries and Switzerland. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 41, 19-34. Hdoi:10.1177/0022022109348918
[6] Strahan, R. and Gerbasi, K.C. (1972) Short, homogenous versions of the Marlowe-Crowne social desirability scale. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 28, 191-193. Hdoi:10.1002/1097-4679(197204)28:2<191::AID-JCLP2270280220>3.0.CO;2-G
[7] Reynolds, K. and Magnan, M.A. (2005) Nursing attitudes and beliefs toward human sexuality: Collaborative research promoting evidence-based practice. Clinical Nurse Specialist, 19, 255-259. Hdoi:10.1097/00002800-200509000-00009
[8] Magnan, M.A. and Reynolds, K. (2006) Barriers to addressing patient sexuality concerns across five areas of specialization. Clinical Nurse Specialist, 20, 285-292. Hdoi:10.1097/00002800-200611000-00009
[9] Zeng, Y.C., Li, Q.P., Wang, N., Ching, S.S.Y. and Loke, A.Y. (2011) Chinese nurses’ attitudes and beliefs toward sexuality care in cancer patients. Cancer Nursing, 34, E14- E20. Hdoi:10.1097/NCC.0b013e3181f04b02
[10] Reynolds, W.M. (1982) Development of reliable and valid short form of the Marlowe-Crown scale of social desirability. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 38, 119-125. Hdoi:10.1002/1097-4679(198201)38:1<119::AID-JCLP2270380118>3.0.CO;2-I
[11] Rudmin, F.W. (1999) Norwegian short-form of the Marlowe-Crowne social desirability scale. Scandiavian Journal of Psychology, 40, 229-233. Hdoi:10.1111/1467-9450.00121
[12] Andrews, P. and Meyer, R. (2003) Marlow-Crowne social desirability scale and short form C: Forensic norms. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 59, 483-492. Hdoi:10.1002/jclp.10136
[13] Edens, J., Buffington, J., Tominic, T. and Riley, B. (2001) Effects of positive impression management on the psychopathic personality inventory. Law and Human Behavior, 25, 235-256. Hdoi:10.1023/A:1010793810896
[14] Smith, P.B. (2004) Acquiescent response bias as an aspect of cultural communication styles. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 35, 50-61. Hdoi:10.1177/0022022103260380
[15] Cohen, J. (1988) Statistical power analysis for the behavioral science. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale.
[16] Rockwood, T. and Constantine, M. (2009) Item and instrument development to assess sexual function and satisfaction in outcomes research. International Urogynecology Journal and Pelvic Floor Dysfunction, 20, S57-S64. Hdoi:10.1007/s00192-009-0842-9

  
comments powered by Disqus

Copyright © 2020 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.