Preliminary Report on the Indoor Electromagnetic Radiation in a Municipality of Western P.R. China: Up-to-Now Still within the Range


Objective: This study is designed to measure the current level of Indoor Electromagnetic Radiation (IER) in Chongqing, a municipality of western P.R. China, on which further epidemiological investigation on the relation between the level of IER and certain health effects could be based. Methods: 118 Households in 4 urban residential districts in Chongqing were randomly selected. The IER intensity was measured in each household’s living room at different frequencies under three different conditions. Results: The average electric field intensity measured at the frequency range of 1 MHz- 40 GHz was within the guidelines set by the International Commission on Non Ionizing Radiation Protection (ICNIRP). The electromagnetic field intensity measured at other frequencies were at the lowest range of the acceptable values. The average electric field intensity at the frequency range of 5 Hz - 1 kHz was higher at a standing posture than at a sitting posture with domestic appliances turned off in both cases (P < 0.01). Conclusion: The indoor electromagnetic radiation in Chongqing currently is still within the recommended public exposure limit set by ICNIRP.

Share and Cite:

T. Fu, Y. Chen, L. Han and Q. Qin, "Preliminary Report on the Indoor Electromagnetic Radiation in a Municipality of Western P.R. China: Up-to-Now Still within the Range," Journal of Electromagnetic Analysis and Applications, Vol. 4 No. 5, 2012, pp. 199-205. doi: 10.4236/jemaa.2012.45027.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.


[1] Z. O. I. Alhekail, “Electromagnetic Radiation from Microwave Ovens,” Journal of Radiological Protection, Vol. 21, No. 3, 2001, pp. 251-258. doi:10.1088/0952-4746/21/3/303
[2] M. D. Taurisano and A. V. Vorst, “Experimental Thermographic Analysis of Thermal Effects Induced on a Human Head Exposed to 900 MHz Fields of Mobile Phones,” IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques, Vol. 48, No. 11, 2000, pp. 2022-2032. doi:10.1109/22.884191
[3] L. Hardell, M. Carlberg and K. H. Mild, “Case–control Study of the Association between the Use of Cellular and Cordless Telephones and Malignant Brain Tumors Diagnosed during 2000–2003,” Environmental Research, Vol. 100, No. 2, 2006, pp. 232-241. doi:10.1016/j.envres.2005.04.006
[4] J. M. Elwood, “A Critical Review of Epidemiologic Studies of Radio Frequency Exposure and Human Cancers,” Environmental Health Perspectives, Vol. 107, No. 1, Suppl. 1, 1999, pp. S155-S168.
[5] E. VanWijngaarden, D. A. Savitz, R. C. Kleckner, J. Cai and D. Loomis, “Exposure to Electromagnetic Fields and Suicide among Electric Utility Workers: A Nested Case —Control Study,” Occupational Environmental Medcine, Vol. 57, No. 4, 2000, pp. 258-263. doi:10.1136/oem.57.4.258
[6] E. Hanada, K. Takano, Y. Antoku, K. Matsumura, Y. Watanabe and Y. Nose, “A Practical Procedure to Prevent Electromagnetic Interference with Electronic Medical Equipment,” Journal of Medical System, Vol. 26, No. 1, 2002, pp. 61-65. doi:10.1023/A:1013094904976
[7] M. Havas. “Biological Effects of Non-ionizing Electromagnetic Energy: A critical Review of the Reports by the US National Research Council and the US National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences as They Relate to the Broad Realm of EMF Bioeffects,” Environmental Review, Vol. 8, No. 3, 2000, pp. 173-253. doi:10.1139/a00-004
[8] H. S. Ge and M. Xie, “Study on Influence of Space Electric Field on Indoor Electromagnetic Distribution,” Chinese Journal of Public Health Engineering, Vol. 4, No. 4, 2005, pp. 200-202.
[9] “Electromagnetic Fields and Public Health,” Accessed 6 July 2010.
[10] “Typical Exposure Levels at Home and in the Environment,” Accessed 6 July 2010.

Copyright © 2023 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.