Unique Screener of Reading Fluency and Comprehension for Adolescents and Adults

Sherry Mee Bell, Kelli Caldwell Miller, Ralph Steve McCallum, Michael Hopkins

.

DOI: 10.4236/psych.2012.31007                

Abstract

Because there are few brief reading fluency screeners available for older adolescents and adults we developed one, then investigated its psychometric properties, obtained for 161 college students. Two experimental versions of this unique, silent, group-administered screener of reading fluency and comprehension require adolescents and adults either to read and identify ideas or words (i.e., word chaining) within connected text of increasing difficulty. Both instruments and the Nelson-Denny Reading Test (Brown, Fishco, & Hanna, 1993) were administered in counterbalanced order. Results indicate moderately strong relationships (r values ranged from .52 to .63) between both versions of the screener and Nelson-Denny comprehension and rate scores. These data provide preliminary evidence of validity for these screeners for this population. The format requiring examinees to identify ideas produced slightly higher correlations with Nelson-Denny comprehension scores than did the word chain format. Both may be useful because they can be created from existing curriculum materials and are efficient (i.e., group administered) and quick (requiring only 5 minutes).

Keywords

Reading; Assessment; Adolescent; Adult

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

[1]	ACT (2006). What the ACT reveals about college readiness in reading. Iowa City, IA: Author.
[2]	AIMSweb (n.d.) Retrieved January 8, 2007 from http://www.aimsweb.com
[3]	Albro, E. R. (2009). Funding for reading research: Grant competitions at the Institute of Education Sciences. Presentation to the National Reading Conference, Albuquerque, NM.
[4]	Allington, R. L. (2009). What really matters in fluency: Research-based practices across the curriculum. Boston: Pearson Education, Inc.
[5]	Bell, A. M., & McCallum, R. S. (2010). Fluency and comprehension screener: Adults (FACS: A). Unpublished test. University of Tennessee.
[6]	Behrman, E. H. (2000). Developmental placement decisions: Content- specific reading assessment. Journal of Developmental Education, 23, 12-14, 16, 18.
[7]	Bell, S. M., & McCallum, R. S. (2008). Handbook of reading assessment. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
[8]	Bell, S. M. McCallum, R. S., Richardson, E., Fuller, E., & McCane, S. (2007). Investigation of the psychometric attributes of the Test of Silent Contextual Reading Fluency. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 33, 39-46. doi:10.1177/15345084070330010501
[9]	Brown, J. A., Fishco, V. V., & Hanna, G. (1993). Nelson-denny reading test: Manual for scoring and interpretation, forms G & H. Rolling Meadows, IL: Riverside Publishing
[10]	Carroll, J. B., & Sapon, S. (2002). Modern language aptitude test: Manual. N. Bethesda, MD: Second Language Testing, Inc.
[11]	Good, R. H., & Kaminski, R. A. (2002). DIBELS oral reading fluency passages for first through third grades. (Technical report no. 10). Eugene, OR: University of Oregon.
[12]	Hammill, D. D., Wiederholt, J. L., & Allen, E. A. (2006). TOSCRF: Test of silent contextual reading fluency: Examiner’s manual. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
[13]	Hopkins, M. B., Mounger, A., Kirk, E. R., & McCallum, R. S. (2009). Reading fluency: A brief ecological classroom assessment. Paper presented at the annual conference of the National Association of School Psychologists Conference, Boston, MA.
[14]	Kaufman, A. S., & Kaufman, N. L. (2004). Kaufman tests of educational achievement (2nd Edition). Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
[15]	Kuhn, M. R., Schwanenflugel, P. J., & Meisinger, E. B. (2010). Aligning theory and assessment of reading fluency: Automaticity, prosody, and definitions of fluency. Reading Research Quarterly, 45, 230-251. doi:10.1598/RRQ.45.2.4
[16]	Kutner, M., Greenberg, E., & Baer, J. (2005). National Assessment of Adult Literacy (NAAL): A first look at the literacy of America’s adults in the 21st Century (No. NCES 2006-470). Jessup, MD: National Center for Educational Statistics.
[17]	Mather, N., Hammill, D. D., Allen, E. A., & Roberts, R. (2004). TOSWRF: Test of silent word reading fluency: Examiner’s manual. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
[18]	McGrew, K., & Woodcock, R. W. (2001). Woodcock-Johnson III technical manual. Itasca, IL: Riverside Publishing.
[19]	Miller-Guron, L. (1999). Word chains: A word reading test for all ages. Windsor, England: NFER-Nelson.
[20]	National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (2000). Report of the National Reading Panel: Teaching children to read (NIH Publication No. 00-4769). Washington DC: Government Printing Office.
[21]	Rasinski, T. V. & Padak, N. (2004). Effective reading strategies: Teaching children who find reading difficult (3rd Edition). Columbus, OH: Pearson Merrill Prentice Hall.
[22]	Samuels, S. J. (2007). The DIBELS tests: Is speed of barking at print what we mean by reading fluency? Reading Research Quarterly, 42, 563-566.
[23]	Trainin, G., & Swanson, H. L. (2005). Cognition, metacognition, and achievement of college students with learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 28, 261-272. doi:10.2307/4126965
[24]	U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics (2004). The condition of education 2004 (NCES 2004-077). Washington DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
[25]	U.S. Department of Education. National Center for Education Statistics (2009). The nations’ report card: Grade 12 reading and mathematics 2009 national and pilot state results. Washington DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
[26]	National Center for Education Statistics (2004). The condition of education 2004 (NCES 2004-077). Washington DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
[27]	Wirt, J., Choy, S., Gerald, D., Provasnik, S., Rooney, P., Watanabe, S., & Tobin, R. (2002). The condition of education (DHHS Publication No. NCES 2002-025). Washington DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
[28]	Ziegler, M. F., McCallum, R. S., & Bell, S.M. (2007). Adult educators in the United States: Who are they and what do they know about teaching reading? In J. R. Kruidenier, & S. M. Bell (Eds.), Perspectives on language and literacy (pp. 50-56). Baltimore, MD: International Dyslexia Association