Open Journal of Animal Sciences

Volume 10, Issue 2 (April 2020)

ISSN Print: 2161-7597   ISSN Online: 2161-7627

Google-based Impact Factor: 1.35  Citations  

Finishing Cattle in All-Natural and Conventional Production Systems

HTML  XML Download Download as PDF (Size: 294KB)  PP. 237-253  
DOI: 10.4236/ojas.2020.102013    1,169 Downloads   2,859 Views  Citations

ABSTRACT

Beef cattle producers in the North America have a variety of production and marketing options and must choose the best production system for their situation. This review describes considerations involved in choosing between feeding cattle conventionally versus feeding them in programs that prohibit the use of certain technologies. Data from peer-reviewed journals, extension publications, nutritional consultants, governmental organizations, and feed companies were used to construct this review. Most cattle in North America are fed in conventional production systems. Conventional beef production systems typically use steroidal implants, ionophores, and beta-adrenergic agonists to improve animal productivity; as well as feed grade and injectable antimicrobials to control, treat or prevent disease and improve animal health. These technologies have been shown to lower the cost of production, allowing for beef to be competitive in the global protein market. Some consumers have expressed a preference for beef produced without these technologies. These “All-natural” (AN) cattle may bring a premium price in the market. The economic impact of differing productions systems can be described in relation to 1) cost of production, 2) operating costs of the feedlot, 3) price paid for feeder calves, and 4) price received for fed cattle. Conventional production provides the most favorable outcome for factors 1, 2, and 3, while AN production provides the most favorable outcome for item 4. There are also industry wide and societal aspects related to differing beef production systems related to health and safety of beef, land use, and cost of production allowing for a greater share of the global protein market. Technologies used in conventional production are critical tools to North American beef production. Differences in efficiencies between each type of non-conventional production systems must be re-captured in added premiums when cattle are marketed and sold. Premiums for AN cattle are enticing, but the true differences in the cost of production between the AN and conventional cattle must be evaluated in order for a producer to make the correct decision for their operation.

Share and Cite:

K. Smith, Z. , T. Anderson, P. and J. Johnson, B. (2020) Finishing Cattle in All-Natural and Conventional Production Systems. Open Journal of Animal Sciences, 10, 237-253. doi: 10.4236/ojas.2020.102013.

Cited by

[1] Bone Biomarker in Feedlot Cattle from Two Different Production Systems
Food Sci Nutr Res, 2023
[2] Effect of the time of supplementation of Zilpaterol hydrochloride on residues in muscle, liver, and kidney of feedlot hair lambs
Gómez, M Vega-Cazares… - Abanico …, 2022
[3] Efecto de tiempo de suplementación de Clorhidrato de Zilpaterol sobre residuos en músculo, hígado y riñón de corderos de pelo en finalización
Gómez, M Vega-Cazares… - Abanico …, 2022
[4] Environmental performance of commercial beef production systems utilizing conventional productivity-enhancing technologies
Translational Animal …, 2022
[5] Effects of feeding high-energy diet on growth performance, blood parameters, and carcass traits in Hanwoo steers
Animal …, 2022
[6] Healthy Livestock Produce Sustainable Food–The Impacts of Livestock Health and the Performance-Enhancing Technologies on Environmental and Economic …
2021
[7] Effects of Corn Silage Inclusion Level and Type of Anabolic Implant on Animal Growth Performance, Apparent Total Tract Digestibility, Beef Production per …
2021
[8] Modeling the effects of steroid implant use on the environmental and economic sustainability of Brazilian beef production
Translational Animal …, 2021
[9] Effects of Corn Silage Inclusion Level and Type of Anabolic Implant on Animal Growth Performance, Apparent Total Tract Digestibility, Beef Production per Hectare …
2021
[10] Productivity-Enhancing Technologies. Can Consumer Choices Affect the Environmental Footprint of Beef?
2021
[11] Effects of corn silage inclusion level and type of anabolic implant on animal growth performance, apparent total tract digestibility, beef production per hectare, and …
Animals, 2021
[12] Nose color of Charolais× British crossbred beef steers alters body weight at a common degree of fatness and marbling score in steers reared under similar …
Am. J. Anim. Vet, 2020
[13] Nose Color of Charolais× British Crossbred Beef Steers Alters Body Weight at a Common Degree of Fatness and Marbling Score in Steers Reared Under …
2020
[14] A pooled analysis of six large-pen feedlot studies: effects of a noncoated initial and terminal implant compared with a single initial and delayed-release implant on …
2020
[15] Evaluation of an active live yeast (Levucell Saccharomyces cerevisiae, CNCM l-1077) on receiving and backgrounding period growth performance and efficiency of dietary net …
2020

Copyright © 2025 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.