Journal of Modern Physics

Volume 9, Issue 7 (June 2018)

ISSN Print: 2153-1196   ISSN Online: 2153-120X

Google-based Impact Factor: 0.97  Citations  

Temperature Scaling in Flat Space Cosmology in Comparison to Standard Cosmology

HTML  XML Download Download as PDF (Size: 1409KB)  PP. 1404-1414  
DOI: 10.4236/jmp.2018.97085    841 Downloads   2,312 Views  Citations

ABSTRACT

Flat Space Cosmology (FSC) is a mathematical model of universal expansion which has proven to be remarkably accurate in comparison to observations. Temperature scaling is redefined in this paper in terms of a new “Universal Temperature” Tu scale according to Tu = T 2, where T 2 is in K2. This rescaling puts FSC cosmic temperature, time, total matter mass, and Hubble radius on the same scale, covering roughly 60.63 logs of 10 from the Planck scale to the present scale. This paper focuses on the relatively subtle temperature curve differences between the FSC model and standard cosmology. These changes become more pronounced in the early universe. Recent observational studies of the early universe, particularly with respect to the “cosmic dawn” epoch, the first stars and first galaxies, have surprised standard model proponents as to how soon these events have occurred following the Big Bang. This paper suggests that, because the FSC model temperature/time curve is lower at each stage of cosmic time, FSC may actually be a better fit for the timing of these events.

Share and Cite:

Tatum, E. and Seshavatharam, U. (2018) Temperature Scaling in Flat Space Cosmology in Comparison to Standard Cosmology. Journal of Modern Physics, 9, 1404-1414. doi: 10.4236/jmp.2018.97085.

Cited by

[1] CMB temperature related to cosmological red-shift
2024
[2] CMB, Hawking, Planck, and Hubble scale relations consistent with recent quantization of general relativity theory
International Journal of Theoretical Physics, 2024
[3] On deterministic quantum gravity from linear cosmology.
2024
[4] Planck quantized bending of light leads to the CMB temperature
Hal archive, 2023
[5] The Hawking temperature as a minimum temperature, the Planck temperature as the maximum temperature and the CMB temperature as a geometric mean …
2023
[6] The CMB temperature as geometric mean gravitational potential energy and also its connection to the electrostatic force
2023
[7] The Hubble frequency and the Hawking temperature
2023
[8] The hawking Hubble temperature as a minimum temperature, the Planck temperature as a maximum temperature and the CMB temperature as their geometric …
Hal archive, 2023
[9] How Flat Space Cosmology Models Dark Energy
2020
[10] How the Dirac Sea Idea May Apply to a Spatially-Flat Universe Model (A Brief Review)
2019
[11] Predicting Dark Energy Survey Results Using the Flat Space Cosmology Model
2019
[12] A Heuristic Model of the Evolving Universe Inspired by Hawking and Penrose
2019
[13] Clues to the Fundamental Nature of Gravity, Dark Energy and Dark Matter
2018
[14] How the CMB Anisotropy Pattern Could Be a Map of Gravitational Entropy
2018
[15] Why Flat Space Cosmology Is Superior to Standard Inflationary Cosmology
2018
[16] Flat Space Cosmology as a Model of Penrose's Weyl Curvature Hypothesis and Gravitational Entropy
2018
[17] Predicted Dark Matter Quantitation in Flat Space Cosmology
2018
[18] Calculating Radiation Temperature Anisotropy in Flat Space Cosmology
2018
[19] Cosmic Time as an Emergent Property of Cosmic Thermodynamics
2018
[20] Flat Space Cosmology as a Model of Light Speed Cosmic Expansion—Implications for the Vacuum Energy Density
2018

Copyright © 2025 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.