Journal of Modern Physics

Volume 8, Issue 1 (January 2017)

ISSN Print: 2153-1196   ISSN Online: 2153-120X

Google-based Impact Factor: 0.97  Citations  

Analysis of Wigner’s Set Theoretical Proof for Bell-Type Inequalities

HTML  XML Download Download as PDF (Size: 324KB)  PP. 57-67  
DOI: 10.4236/jmp.2017.81005    1,473 Downloads   2,892 Views  Citations

ABSTRACT

We present a detailed analysis of the set theoretical proof of Wigner for Bell type inequalities with the following result. Wigner introduced a crucial assumption that is not related to Einstein’s local realism, but instead, without justification, to the existence of certain joint probability measures for possible and actual measurement outcomes of Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen (EPR) experiments. His conclusions about Einstein’s local realism are, therefore, not applicable to EPR experiments and the contradiction of the experimental outcomes to Wigner’s results has no bearing on the validity of Einstein’s local realism.

Share and Cite:

Hess, K. , De Raedt, H. and Michielsen, K. (2017) Analysis of Wigner’s Set Theoretical Proof for Bell-Type Inequalities. Journal of Modern Physics, 8, 57-67. doi: 10.4236/jmp.2017.81005.

Cited by

[1] Einstein–Podolsky–Rosen–Bohm experiments: A discrete data driven approach
Annals of Physics, 2023
[2] A Critical Review of Works Pertinent to the Einstein-Bohr Debate and Bell's Theorem
Symmetry, 2022
[3] A Path Integral Generalization of Bell Local Hidden Variable Models for Unstable Particles
Journal of Applied Mathematics and Physics, 2021
[4] Discrete-event simulation of an extended Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen-Bohm experiment
2020
[5] Kolmogorov's Probability Spaces for “Entangled” Data-Subsets of EPRB Experiments: No Violation of Einstein's Separation Principle
2020
[6] Bell's theorem and Instantaneous influences at a distance
2018
[7] Extended Bell inequality and maximum violation
Chinese Physics B, 2018
[8] Ever New" Loopholes" in Bell's Argument and Experimental Tests
2017
[9] Special Issue: Ever New" Loopholes" in Bell's Argument and Experimental Tests
Open Physics, 2017
[10] What exactly is proved by the violation of Bell's inequality?
2017

Copyright © 2025 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.