Psychology

Volume 5, Issue 14 (September 2014)

ISSN Print: 2152-7180   ISSN Online: 2152-7199

Google-based Impact Factor: 1.62  Citations  

Screening for Somatoform Disorders in Children and Adolescents

HTML  Download Download as PDF (Size: 2655KB)  PP. 1629-1637  
DOI: 10.4236/psych.2014.514173    5,290 Downloads   7,416 Views  Citations

ABSTRACT

Until now, no German diagnostic instrument existed for somatoform disorders in children and adolescents. Therefore the Screening for Somatoform Disorders in Children and Adolescents (SOMS-CA) was developed based on the SOMS-2 (Screening for Somatoform Disorders 2) (Rief & Hiller, 2008). This study investigates to what extent the SOMS-CA can differentiate significantly between children and adolescents with clinically diagnosed somatoform disorders and a control group and whether the SOMS-CA is superior to the GSCL-C (Giessen Subjective Complaint List for Children) (Braehler, 1992). 30 patients (11 - 17 years) with somatoform disorders and a control group (n = 31) were examined with the SOMS-CA (N = 61). The results from the SOMS-CA in both groups were compared with one another by means of a contingency analysis (chi-square test). The sensitivity and specificity were calculated and an optimal cut-off value was determined (Receiver Operating Characteristic curve (ROC-curve) analysis). A comparison analysis of the ROC-curves of the SOMS-CA and the GSCL-C followed. The sum score of complaints in the patients was significantly higher than that in the control group. The ROC-curve for the SOMS-CA demonstrates its excellent ability to differentiate between the two groups with an AUC (area under the curve) = 0.983 (SE = 0.14; N = 61). The sensitivity was 97.6%, the specificity 96.8%. In comparison to the AUC of the GSCL-C the SOMS-CA shows a much higher result. The SOMS-CA successfully identifies patients with somatoform disorders from a paediatric population and differentiates from healthy test subjects. A comparison to the GSCL-C shows a considerable superiority of the SOMS-CA. Further studies on the validity of the SOMS-CA are necessary.

Share and Cite:

Winter, S. , Quinn, C. , Lenz, K. , Pfeiffer, E. & Lehmkuhl, U. (2014). Screening for Somatoform Disorders in Children and Adolescents. Psychology, 5, 1629-1637. doi: 10.4236/psych.2014.514173.

Cited by

[1] Prevalence of Somatic Symptoms and Somatoform Disorders among a German Adolescent Psychiatric Inpatient Sample
Children, 2024
[2] Medically unexplained symptoms in children and adolescents: Illness-related self-concept and parental symptom evaluations
2020
[3] Screening für Somatoforme Störungen des Kindes-und Jugendalters (SOMS-KJ)
2018
[4] Somatoform symptoms in adolescents who visit the emergency department: alexithymia and defensive strategies
European Proceedings of Social and …, 2017
[5] ATTACHEMENT STYLE AND PERCEIVED SOCIAL SUPPORT--CONTRIBUTIONS TO THE ONSET OF SOMATOFORM COMPLAINTS IN ADOLESCENTS.
Romanian Journal of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 2016
[6] Bindung & somatoforme Symptome im Kindesalter
[7] Screening für Somatoforme Störungen des Kindes-und Jugendalters (SOMS-KJ): ein Vergleich zwischen Patienten mit einer somatoformen Störung …
Dissertation, Berlin

Copyright © 2025 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.