Open Journal of Medical Psychology

Volume 2, Issue 1 (January 2013)

ISSN Print: 2165-9370   ISSN Online: 2165-9389

Google-based Impact Factor: 1.25  Citations  

Medically Unexplained Symptoms (MUS): What Do Current Trainee Psychologists, Neurologists and Psychiatrists Believe?

HTML  XML Download Download as PDF (Size: 86KB)  PP. 12-20  
DOI: 10.4236/ojmp.2013.21003    4,431 Downloads   8,038 Views  Citations

ABSTRACT

Objectives: Medically unexplained symptoms (MUS) are common in all medical settings. These conditions remain controversial, aetiology remains poorly understood and treatments have been slow to develop. This study aimed to examine the beliefs held by psychologists and other professionals about MUS, which may impact upon clinical practice. Design: 375 clinical psychology trainees from 23UKtraining courses, 12 neurologists and 19 psychiatrists in training completed a weblink survey designed to elicit a range of beliefs about MUS cause and treatment. Results: All three groups viewed MUS as a common clinical problem. Use of terminology differed between groups. All three groups held a view that sexual abuse was a medium to high risk factor for developing MUS. Only a minority of psychologists and psychiatrists doubted that the human mind is capable of massive repression for past distressing events; and few psychologists, and no psychiatrists, doubted the traditional psychodynamic causal model of MUS. Neurologists were generally more skeptical. Only a minority of all three groups disagreed that hypnosis was a helpful way to uncover memories that people can not access. Around one third of each group believed that traumatic memories recovered in therapy were reliable. Dualistic thinking was prevalent among all three groups, but more so among psychiatrists. Conclusions: The data show that many professsionals hold beliefs about MUS for which, empirical support is lacking. These beliefs may impact on clinical practice. Whether such beliefs are deemed to be correct or incorrect, they should be acknowledged.

Share and Cite:

S. Kemp, C. Spilling, C. Hughes and K. Pauw, "Medically Unexplained Symptoms (MUS): What Do Current Trainee Psychologists, Neurologists and Psychiatrists Believe?," Open Journal of Medical Psychology, Vol. 2 No. 1, 2013, pp. 12-20. doi: 10.4236/ojmp.2013.21003.

Cited by

[1] UPPFATTNINGAR OM BORTTRÄNGDA MINNEN: En enkätundersökning med psykologer och psykologstudenter
2024
[2] The natural history of terms describing functional (neurological) disorders in the medical literature of the last 60 years
Journal of Neurology, 2023
[3] Beliefs in repressed memory and dissociative amnesia from a cross-cultural lens
Journal of Criminal Psychology, 2023
[4] The return of the repressed: the persistent and problematic claims of long-forgotten trauma
2019
[5] The resource utilisation of medically unexplained physical symptoms
2016
[6] Latent variables underlying the memory beliefs of Chartered Clinical Psychologists, Hypnotherapists and undergraduate students
Memory, 2015
[7] Symptom exaggeration and symptom validity testing in persons with medically unexplained neurologic presentations
Neurology: Clinical Practice, 2014
[8] L'amnésie traumatique en contexte juridique: une notion discutable et discutée

Copyright © 2025 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.