Psychology

Volume 3, Issue 12 (December 2012)

ISSN Print: 2152-7180   ISSN Online: 2152-7199

Google-based Impact Factor: 1.62  Citations  

Procedural Justice and Innovation: Does Procedural Justice Foster Innovative Behavior?

HTML  Download Download as PDF (Size: 113KB)  PP. 1100-1103  
DOI: 10.4236/psych.2012.312A162    6,722 Downloads   11,529 Views  Citations

ABSTRACT

The influence of procedural justice on intended innovative behavior was studied in a sample of students and employees. Although earlier studies suggests that procedural justice increases innovation-related behavior such as spontaneous cooperation, so far systematic research is scarce. Results indicated that the provision of voice increased participants’ intention to show innovative behavior such as task revision, creativity, and persistence in a business simulation task. Furthermore, the effects found were mediated by intrinsic motivation and identification, but not by occupational self-efficacy. These findings suggest that justice in organizations and procedural fair conditions in particular can drive innovations.

Share and Cite:

Streicher, B. , Jonas, E. , Maier, G. and Frey, D. (2012) Procedural Justice and Innovation: Does Procedural Justice Foster Innovative Behavior?. Psychology, 3, 1100-1103. doi: 10.4236/psych.2012.312A162.

Cited by

[1] Transformational Leadership and Employee Innovative Behaviour in The Egyptian Travel Agents: A Mediation–Moderation Model
2023
[2] Managing the Agility of Organisational Units: A Middle Management Perspective
THESIS, 2021
[3] PERAN MEDIASI KOMITMEN AFEKTIF PADA PENGARUH KEADILAN ORGANISASIONAL TERHADAP PERILAKU INOVATIF
2021
[4] Does Organizational Justice Influence Employee Innovative Behavior in an Arabic Context? Evidence From the Libyan Oil Industry
SAGE Open, 2021
[5] Der moderne Arbeitsplatz. Die Digitalisierung als Einflussfaktor auf die Kreativität
2020
[6] Fair-weather folks or team players? The effects of idea rejection on fairness and implementation efforts
2019
[7] Mediating Role of Organizational Citizenship Behavior in the Relationship with Abusive Supervision and Employees' Innovative Self-Efficacy in Shiraz University of …
2019
[8] Hvordan har rettsforlik inngått i jordskifteretten fungert i ettertid?
2019
[9] JHMI
2019
[10] PENGARUH ORGANIZATIONAL JUSTICE TERHADAP KNOWLEDGE SHARING DAN INNOVATIVE WORK BEHAVIOR PADA CHAIN HOTEL DI JAWA TIMUR
2019
[11] EXPLORING THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN PROCEDURAL JUSTICE AND INNOVATIVE WORK BEHAVIOR IN HOSPITALITY INDUSTRY
2019
[12] LMX 의 TMGT 효과와 팀 동적역량의 교차수준 조절역할: 소방공무원을 중심으로
2018
[13] Führung und Redaktionsmanagement–Zur Kultur innovativer Sportredaktionen
Sportjournalistik, 2018
[14] Constructing a psychosocial profile for enhancing the career success of South African professional women
2018
[15] ORGANISATIONAL JUSTICE AND MANAGING WORKPLACE INNOVATION: HOW IMPORTANT ARE FORMAL PROCEDURES?
International Journal of Innovation Management, 2018
[16] Organizational Justice in Arab Countries: Investigation of the Measurement and Structural Invariance
2018
[17] LMX 의 TMGT 효과와 팀 동적역량의 교차수준 조절역할
2018
[18] 조직공정성 및 조직정치지각이 구성원의 조직냉소주의, 혁신저항, 창의성에 미치는 영향: 조직침묵의 매개효과: 조직침묵의 매개효과
비서· 사무경영연구, 2018
[19] 경찰공무원의 조직공정성 인식이 서비스지향 행동에 미치는 영향: 직무만족의 매개효과를 중심으로: 직무만족의 매개효과를 중심으로
한국공공관리학보, 2018
[20] Explanation of the role of intermediary perception of organizational justice in relationships between abusive supervision and innovative self-efficacy in the shiraz …
2017
[21] Tischlein deck dich, Esel streck dich, Knüppel aus dem Sack von Ludwig Bechstein (1847)
Psychologie der M?rchen, 2017
[22] Explanation of the Role of Intermediary Perception of Organizational Justice in Relationships between Abusive Supervision and Innovative Self-Efficacy
2017
[23] تبیین نقش واسطه گری ادراک از عدالت سازمانی در روابط بین تعدّی نظارتی و خودکارآمدی نوآورانه ی کارکنان دانشگاه علوم پزشکی شیراز‎
Payavard Salamat, 2017
[24] EXPLANATION OF THE ROLE OF INTERMEDIARY PERCEPTION OF ORGANIZATIONAL JUSTICE IN RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN ABUSIVE SUPERVISION AND …
2017
[25] Was fördert Innovation im Unternehmen?
2016

Copyright © 2025 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.