International Journal of Clinical Medicine

Volume 3, Issue 7 (December 2012)

ISSN Print: 2158-284X   ISSN Online: 2158-2882

Google-based Impact Factor: 0.51  Citations  

Team Effectiveness in Patient Health Management: An Overview of Reviews

HTML  Download Download as PDF (Size: 294KB)  PP. 614-627  
DOI: 10.4236/ijcm.2012.37111    4,824 Downloads   8,090 Views  Citations

ABSTRACT

Background: The desire to improve the quality of health care for an aging population with multiple chronic diseases is fostering a rapid growth in interprofessional team care, supported by health professionals, governments, businesses and public institutions. However, the weight of evidence measuring the impact of team care on patient and health system outcomes has not, heretofore, been clear. To address this deficiency, we evaluated published evidence for the clinical effectiveness of team care within a chronic disease management context in a systematic overview. Methods: A search strategy was built for Medline using medical subject headings and other relevant keywords. After testing for performance, the search strategy was adapted to other databases (Cinhal, Cochrane, Embase, PsychInfo) using their specific descriptors. The searches were limited to reviews published between 1996 and 2011, in English and French languages. The results were analyzed by the number of studies favouring team intervention, based on the direction of effect and statistical significance for all reported outcomes. Results: Sixteen systematic and 7 narrative reviews were included. Diseases most frequently targeted were depression, followed by heart failure, diabetes and mental disorders. Effectiveness outcome measures most commonly used were clinical endpoints, resource utilization (e.g., emergency room visits, hospital admissions), costs, quality of life and medication adherence. Briefly, while improved clinical and resource utilization endpoints were commonly reported as positive outcomes, mixed directional results were often found among costs, medication adherence, mortality and patient satisfaction outcomes. Conclusions: We conclude that, although suggestive of some specific benefits, the overall weight of evidence for team care efficacy remains equivocal. Further studies that examine the causal interactions between multidisciplinary team care and clinical and economic outcomes of disease management are needed to more accurately assess its net program efficacy and population effectiveness.

Share and Cite:

A. Gogovor, B. Burnand, S. Ahmed, T. Montague and I. Peytremann-Bridevaux, "Team Effectiveness in Patient Health Management: An Overview of Reviews," International Journal of Clinical Medicine, Vol. 3 No. 7, 2012, pp. 614-627. doi: 10.4236/ijcm.2012.37111.

Cited by

[1] Determining Contemporary Barriers to Effective Multidisciplinary Team Meetings in Neurological Surgery: A Review of the Literature
World Neurosurgery, 2023
[2] Evaluation of Clinical Team Competence: Case of Saudi Arabia
2020
[3] Terrence Montague, CM, CD, MD, Joanna Nemis-White, BSc, PMP, John Aylen, MA, Emily Torr, BPHE, MSc, Lesli
2019
[4] Determinants Of Patient Experience With Low Back Pain Interdisciplinary Care: A Pre-Post Interventional Study
2019
[5] Support for teams, technology and patient involvement in decision-making associated with support for patient-centred care
International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 2018
[6] A narrative meta‐review of a series of systematic and meta‐analytic reviews on the intervention outcome for children with developmental co‐ordination disorder
Child: care, health and development, 2016

Copyright © 2025 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.