Journal of Cancer Therapy

Volume 3, Issue 5 (October 2012)

ISSN Print: 2151-1934   ISSN Online: 2151-1942

Google-based Impact Factor: 0.35  Citations  

The Reliability of Assessment of Ki-67 Expression on Core Needle Biopsy and the Surgical Specimens of Invasive Breast Cancer: Comparison of Local Pathologists’ Assessment and Central Review

HTML  Download Download as PDF (Size: 174KB)  PP. 841-845  
DOI: 10.4236/jct.2012.325107    4,530 Downloads   7,722 Views  Citations

ABSTRACT

Purpose: The aim of this study was to assess the reliability of Ki-67 expression on core needle biopsy (CNB) and the surgical specimens of invasive breast cancer. We examined the concordance rate of Ki-67 expressions, hormone receptors, and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) status from a CNB with from a surgery in invasive breast cancer. Methods: A retrospective study was conducted on a clinical database of patients who underwent surgery for early breast cancer. Of these, 193 patients who underwent CNB before the surgery were enrolled. A cut-off value of 20% was used for Ki-67-positive criteria. Expression of estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PgR), and HER2 were examined and compared with that of Ki-67. To evaluate discordance between the pathologists’ earlier assessments, we re-examined Ki-67 expression among the Ki-67 discordant group in a central laboratory. Results: The concordance rate for Ki-67 expression between the two specimen types was 77.7%, which was significantly lower than that for ER, PgR, and HER2 expression (95.9%, 88.1%, and 91.6%, respectively). The concordance rate for re-examined Ki-67 expression among the Ki-67 discordant group improved to 93.8% and was not significantly different from that for the other receptors. Conclusion: The concordance rate for Ki-67 expression between biopsy and surgical specimens was significantly lower than that for ER, PgR, and HER2 expressions, but re-examination of Ki-67 expression in a central laboratory revealed no significant difference among the receptors, suggesting the need for standard pathological assessment of Ki-67 expression for clinical use as a predictive marker of breast cancer.

Share and Cite:

Y. Mizuno, T. Natori, N. Takeda, J. Yamada, H. Abe, Y. Inoue, H. Seto and K. Sato, "The Reliability of Assessment of Ki-67 Expression on Core Needle Biopsy and the Surgical Specimens of Invasive Breast Cancer: Comparison of Local Pathologists’ Assessment and Central Review," Journal of Cancer Therapy, Vol. 3 No. 5A, 2012, pp. 841-845. doi: 10.4236/jct.2012.325107.

Cited by

[1] Assessment of Ki67 in Breast Cancer: A Comparison Between the Eye-10 Method, Stepwise Counting Strategy, and International System of Ki67 Evaluation
2019
[2] Risk Factors Associated with Discordant Ki-67 Levels between Preoperative Biopsy and Postoperative Surgical Specimens in Breast Cancers
PloS one, 2016
[3] Comparing Oncotype DX Recurrence Score Categories with Immunohistochemically Defined Luminal Subtypes
Journal of Cancer Therapy, 2016
[4] Standardized assessment of Ki-67 in Breast cancer patients using virtual slides and an automated analyzer in comparison to central/local pathological …
2014
[5] Standardized Assessment of Ki-67 in Breast Cancer Patients Using Virtual Slides and an Automated Analyzer in Comparison to Central/Local Pathological Assessments
Journal of Cancer Therapy, 2014

Copyright © 2025 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.