Open Journal of Ophthalmology

Volume 2, Issue 2 (May 2012)

ISSN Print: 2165-7408   ISSN Online: 2165-7416

Google-based Impact Factor: 0.55  Citations  

Vision Screening in the Pediatrician’s Office

HTML  Download Download as PDF (Size: 176KB)  PP. 9-13  
DOI: 10.4236/ojoph.2012.22003    4,287 Downloads   8,241 Views  Citations

ABSTRACT

Objective: To assess current practices, attitudes, and perceived barriers toward pediatric vision screening. Patients and Methods: A link to a 9-question survey was electronically distributed to a national sample of 6000 pediatricians through Medical Marketing Services Inc. Data were collected using Survey Monkey. Results: Email open rate was 11%; 37% of those who opened the email responded (225 respondents). Over ninety percent of respondents perform some type of vision screening at least yearly, although age at which screening began varied, with two thirds of respondents instituting formal vision screening after three years. Fifty eight percent of respondents were either extremely unsatisfied, unsatisfied or only somewhat satisfied with their current screening method. Preferred methods of screening and confidence of pediatricians in their ability to detect pathology varied for children under versus over age three. The least frequently used methods for all age groups were autorefraction and photoscreening. The most commonly reported barriers to screening were inadequate training (48%), time required for exam (42%), and inadequate reimbursement (32%). Conclusions: Perceived barriers to vision screening in the pediatrician office have been previously identified, and photoscreening and autorefraction have been identified as a possible means to circumvent them. In spite of the addition of new procedural codes, pediatricians continue to report similar barriers to screening.

Share and Cite:

N. L. Couser, F. Q. Esmail and A. K. Hutchinson, "Vision Screening in the Pediatrician’s Office," Open Journal of Ophthalmology, Vol. 2 No. 2, 2012, pp. 9-13. doi: 10.4236/ojoph.2012.22003.

Cited by

[1] Comparison of HOTV optotypes and Lea Symbols: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Journal of American …, 2024
[2] Vision Screening Claims for Young Children in the United States
Pediatrics, 2023
[3] Development of a system based on artificial intelligence to identify visual problems in children: study protocol of the TrackAI project
2020
[4] Knowledge, Attitude And Practice Of Ethiopian Paediatricians On Childhood Eye Diseases
2020
[5] Automated Vision Screening
Advances in Ophthalmology and Optometry, 2018
[6] Evidence Synthesis Number 153
2017
[7] Vision Screening in Children Aged 6 Months to 5 Years: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement
2017
[8] Evidence Synthesis Number 164
2017
[9] The WHEELS Preschool Vision Screening Program's Initial Outcomes for 12,402 Children Screened Using the Plusoptix Photoscreener
International Scholarly Research Notices, 2014
[10] Preschool vision screening: update on guidelines and techniques
Current Opinion in Ophthalmology, 2013
[11] American Academy of Ophthalmology Refractive Management/Intervention Panel. Preferred Practice Pattern ? Guidelines. Refractive
2012

Copyright © 2025 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.