American Journal of Operations Research

Volume 2, Issue 1 (March 2012)

ISSN Print: 2160-8830   ISSN Online: 2160-8849

Google-based Impact Factor: 1.72  Citations  

Empirical Analysis for High Quality Software Development

HTML  XML Download Download as PDF (Size: 202KB)  PP. 36-42  
DOI: 10.4236/ajor.2012.21004    6,036 Downloads   9,644 Views  Citations

ABSTRACT

It remains important for a development organization to configure a software process that enables it to develop software products with the least possible number of defects after shipment. A development organization of CMMI level 5 has, over three years, been strived to improve those software projects that had been noted as having many defects after shipment. In this paper, we discuss our organization’s improvement (Kaizen) activities, to analyze the important matters of software process to be considered when developing a software product with the least possible number of defects after shipment. Our results are identified by three important points; 1) early ensured quality by defect detection during design or code review; 2) quality assurance for both process quality and product one; and 3) quantitative management by which data of the appropriate resolution can be collected at an appropriate timing.

Share and Cite:

N. Honda and S. Yamada, "Empirical Analysis for High Quality Software Development," American Journal of Operations Research, Vol. 2 No. 1, 2012, pp. 36-42. doi: 10.4236/ajor.2012.21004.

Cited by

[1] EEG as a potential ground truth for the assessment of cognitive state in software development activities: A multimodal imaging study
Plos one, 2024
[2] Quality Evaluation of Modern Code Reviews Through Intelligent Biometric Program Comprehension
IEEE Transactions on …, 2022
[3] Why is it so hard to predict computer systems failures?
2021 17th European …, 2021
[4] Can EEG Be Adopted as a Neuroscience Reference for Assessing Software Programmers' Cognitive Load?
2021
[5] Reading and calculation neural systems and their weighted adaptive use for programming skills
Neural …, 2021
[6] IDE Com Destaque De Biofeedback Inteligente
2020
[7] A measurement framework for software product maturity assessment
2019
[8] Модуль оценки реализации требований к специальному программному обеспечению
2019
[9] Pupillography as indicator of programmers' mental effort and cognitive overload
2019
[10] Biofeedback augmented software engineering: monitoring of programmers' mental effort
2019
[11] The role of the insula in intuitive expert bug detection in computer code: an fMRI study
Brain Imaging and Behavior, 2018
[12] Examining Software Engineering Beliefs about System Testing Defects
2017
[13] WAP: Understanding the brain at software debugging
2016
[14] An Efficient Method for Quality Estimation in Open Source Software Using Improved Particle Swarm Optimization.
International Journal of Applied Engineering Research, 2015

Copyright © 2025 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.