Open Journal of Philosophy

Volume 15, Issue 1 (February 2025)

ISSN Print: 2163-9434   ISSN Online: 2163-9442

Google-based Impact Factor: 0.38  Citations  

The Pinnacle of Science or the End of Scientific Thought?
—The Fifth Discussion of the Theoretical Contradictions between Quantum Mechanics and Relativity Using Cosmic Origin Philosophy

  XML Download Download as PDF (Size: 417KB)  PP. 41-63  
DOI: 10.4236/ojpp.2025.151004    25 Downloads   230 Views  
Author(s)

ABSTRACT

Quantum mechanics and relativity spurred the Third Industrial Revolution, presenting no contradictions in applied engineering but significant theoretical discord. The electronic computer, another major achievement of this era, transformed humanity through the rise of information networks, marking information science as another critical outcome of the revolution. Matter transforms into energy, energy into matter, and mechanics serve as profound conduits for information, even enabling the creation of robots. Modern physics now faces interpretative divides, having seemingly overlooked philosophy and information science’s foundational roles. Human intellect, while reaching new heights through material philosophy, finds itself tangled in confusion. Has science achieved the apex of thought, or does it face an intellectual dead end? This question hints at a revolutionary awakening in human thought. This paper delves deeply into these questions by analyzing and reflecting on the “Scientific Cosmological Ontology,” “Modern Physical Philosophy Framework,” “The Physical Principles of Natural Philosophy,” and “Reflections on the Philosophy of Science.”

Share and Cite:

Liu, S. (2025) The Pinnacle of Science or the End of Scientific Thought?
—The Fifth Discussion of the Theoretical Contradictions between Quantum Mechanics and Relativity Using Cosmic Origin Philosophy. Open Journal of Philosophy, 15, 41-63. doi: 10.4236/ojpp.2025.151004.

Cited by

No relevant information.

Copyright © 2025 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.