Journal of Water Resource and Protection

Volume 2, Issue 2 (February 2010)

ISSN Print: 1945-3094   ISSN Online: 1945-3108

Google-based Impact Factor: 1.65  Citations  

Comparative Identification of Wellhead Protection Areas for Municipal Supply Wells in Gaza

HTML  XML Download Download as PDF (Size: 3082KB)  PP. 105-114  
DOI: 10.4236/jwarp.2010.22012    4,640 Downloads   8,883 Views  Citations

Affiliation(s)

.

ABSTRACT

Groundwater is the only source of fresh water in Gaza Strip while its inhabitants and its water consumption increased rapidly. This study aims at preserving and protecting the groundwater from any pollutants caused by 141 industrial installations through the work of delineation of Wellhead Protection Areas (WHPA) for 47 Municipal Supply Wells in Gaza Governorate boundaries. WHPA has been determined in three different methods: Calculated Fixed-Radius Method (CFR), Analytical Method (AM), and Wellhead Analytic Ele-ment Model (WhAEM2000) which is currently used by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). These methods mainly depend on the time it takes groundwater to travel a specified horizontal dis-tance. Three well zones were delineated for each municipal production well, the first zone is 50 days time of travel (TOT), the second zone is 2 years TOT and the third zone is 5 years TOT. Different values of the ra-dius of WHPA of each well were obtained using the three methods. Consequently, several industrial installa-tions were laid inside the WHPA according to the radius values. The results show that CFR method is the weakest method because it does not take into account regional groundwater flow, causing a hydraulic gradi-ent. WHPAs identified by these methods may be either too large or too small, resulting in wellhead overpro-tection or under protection. Analytical Method incorporates hydrogeologic characteristics of the aquifer, groundwater flow, and hydrogeologic boundaries into the model. Often produces a WHPA that is smaller than the one produced using CRF. WhAEM2000 method is the best method because it uses a hydrogeologi-cal computer model of groundwater flow and it provides a more accurate delineation of the WHPA. It often produces a smaller area to manage than other methods. The study concluded that all industrial installations located in the WHPA should be carefully checked and investigated by governmental authorities. Mitigation measures for pollutants and licenses for the establishment of any new industrial installations could be based on the delineation of WHPAs using the previously mentioned methods.

Share and Cite:

Mogheir, Y. and Tarazi, G. (2010) Comparative Identification of Wellhead Protection Areas for Municipal Supply Wells in Gaza. Journal of Water Resource and Protection, 2, 105-114. doi: 10.4236/jwarp.2010.22012.

Cited by

[1] Analysis and comparison of wellhead protection areas delimitation methods applying a stochastic MODFLOW model as a reference
Environmental Monitoring …, 2023
[2] ZONAT E MBROJTURA UJORE NË LOKACIONIN VRELLË-LIPJAN
2020
[3] Evaluation of Methods for Determining the Drinking Wellhead Protection Area Using Numerical Model (Case study: Birjand plain)
2018
[4] Comparison and economic appraisal of various methods used for the delineation of wellhead protection zones
2017
[5] Establishing wellhead protection areas and managing point and non-point pollution sources to support groundwater protection in the aquifer of Upper …
2017
[6] Modelagem do potencial de poluição por nitrato usando uma abordagem estatística multivariada: o caso dos aquíferos de Kinshasa, República Democrática do …
Hydrogeology …, 2016
[7] Wyznaczanie terenu ochrony pośredniej ujęcia wód podziemnych. Porównanie wyników uzyskanych metodami analitycznymi z modelowaniem numerycznym
2015
[8] Wyznaczanie terenu ochrony pośredniej ujęcia wód podziemnych: porównanie wyników uzyskanych metodami analitycznymi z modelowaniem numerycznym
2015
[9] Modelling nitrate pollution pressure using a multivariate statistical approach: the case of Kinshasa groundwater body, Democratic Republic of Congo
Hydrogeology Journal, 2015
[10] Delineating cost‐effective wellhead protection zones in a rural area in Greece
Water and Environment Journal, 2014
[11] Delineating cost‐effective wellhead protection zones in a rural area in G reece
Water and Environment Journal, 2014
[12] Groundwater management and modelling of the Gaza Strip
2013
[13] A Comparison of Delineation Methods for Wellhead Protection Area Case Study: Drinking Wells of Hamedan City
2013
[14] WATER MANAGEMENT AND MODELLING OF A COASTAL AQUIFER–CASE STUDY (GAZA STRIP)
2013
[15] Delineation of wellhead protection zones for the control of point pollution sources in the aquifer of N. Moudania, Greece
2012
[16] Aquifer Vulnerability Assessment and Wellhead Protection Areas to Prevent Groundwater Contamination in Agricultural Areas: An Integrated Approach
Journal of Water Resource and Protection, 2012

Copyright © 2025 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.