Author(s)

Li Wang^1*, Boboev Nodir², Jamal Aitlaadam³

¹International Relations & Law, Shi Liang School of Law, Changzhou University, Changzhou, China.
²School of Administration, Changchun University, Changchun, China.
³PhD in International Relations and Law, Faculty of Government and Economic and Social Science, Poly-Tech Morocco, Marrakech, Morocco.

This article endorses the idea of indivisible security as the principle in international law. To that end, first it reviews the legacy of the balance of power and collective security in Europe as they have been taken as the institutions in public law for embracing common interests and the concert of Europe in a self-help system. Then it argues that since the term of indivisible security was written into the multi-formal treaties since 1975, the signatory states should abide by it as one of the recognized rules of law for ensuring a common and agreed security space in Europe. Given the self-help nature of inter-state system, there exist the obstacles to implement indivisible security as the rule of law. Nonetheless, the international society appeals to rebuilding jointly a balanced and effective security architecture to warrant the legitimate and reasonable security concerns of all countries.

Indivisible Security, Balance of Power, Collective Security, Law, International Society

Wang, L. , Nodir, B. and Aitlaadam, J. (2023) Consent and Caution: Re-Examination of Indivisible Security in Public Law. Beijing Law Review, 14, 1725-1734. doi: 10.4236/blr.2023.144095.