Open Journal of Statistics

Volume 12, Issue 2 (April 2022)

ISSN Print: 2161-718X   ISSN Online: 2161-7198

Google-based Impact Factor: 1.45  Citations  

A Comparison of the Estimators of the Scale Parameter of the Errors Distribution in the L1 Regression

HTML  XML Download Download as PDF (Size: 398KB)  PP. 261-276  
DOI: 10.4236/ojs.2022.122018    168 Downloads   666 Views  Citations

ABSTRACT

The L1 regression is a robust alternative to the least squares regression whenever there are outliers in the values of the response variable, or the errors follow a long-tailed distribution. To calculate the standard errors of the L1 estimators, construct confidence intervals and test hypotheses about the parameters of the model, or to calculate a robust coefficient of determination, it is necessary to have an estimate of a scale parameterτ. This parameter is such that τ2/n is the variance of the median of a sample of size n from the errors distribution. [1] proposed the use of , a consistent, and so, an asymptotically unbiased estimator of τ. However, this estimator is not stable in small samples, in the sense that it can increase with the introduction of new independent variables in the model. When the errors follow the Laplace distribution, the maximum likelihood estimator of τ, say , is the mean absolute error, that is, the mean of the absolute residuals. This estimator always decreases when new independent variables are added to the model. Our objective is to develop asymptotic properties of under several errors distributions analytically. We also performed a simulation study to compare the distributions of both estimators in small samples with the objective to establish conditions in which is a good alternative to for such situations.

Share and Cite:

de André, C. and Elian, S. (2022) A Comparison of the Estimators of the Scale Parameter of the Errors Distribution in the L1 Regression. Open Journal of Statistics, 12, 261-276. doi: 10.4236/ojs.2022.122018.

Cited by

No relevant information.

Copyright © 2025 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.