Open Journal of Soil Science

Volume 11, Issue 2 (February 2021)

ISSN Print: 2162-5360   ISSN Online: 2162-5379

Google-based Impact Factor: 2.27  Citations  

Optimal Sampling and Assay for Estimating Soil Organic Carbon

HTML  XML Download Download as PDF (Size: 1039KB)  PP. 93-121  
DOI: 10.4236/ojss.2021.112006    882 Downloads   3,130 Views  Citations
Author(s)

ABSTRACT

The world needs around 150 Pg of negative carbon emissions to mitigate climate change. Global soils may provide a stable, sizeable reservoir to help achieve this goal by sequestering atmospheric carbon dioxide as soil organic carbon (SOC). In turn, SOC can support healthy soils and provide a multitude of ecosystem benefits. To support SOC sequestration, researchers and policy makers must be able to precisely measure the amount of SOC in a given plot of land. SOC measurement is typically accomplished by taking soil cores selected at random from the plot under study, mixing (compositing) some of them together, and analyzing (assaying) the composited samples in a laboratory. Compositing reduces assay costs, which can be substantial. Taking samples is also costly. Given uncertainties and costs in both sampling and assay along with a desired estimation precision, there is an optimal composite size that will minimize the budget required to achieve that precision. Conversely, given a fixed budget, there is a composite size that minimizes uncertainty. In this paper, we describe and formalize sampling and assay for SOC and derive the optima for three commonly used assay methods: dry combustion in an elemental analyzer, loss-on-ignition, and mid-infrared spectroscopy. We demonstrate the utility of this approach using data from a soil survey conducted in California. We give recommendations for practice and provide software to implement our framework.

Share and Cite:

Spertus, J. (2021) Optimal Sampling and Assay for Estimating Soil Organic Carbon. Open Journal of Soil Science, 11, 93-121. doi: 10.4236/ojss.2021.112006.

Copyright © 2025 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.