American Journal of Computational Mathematics

Volume 10, Issue 4 (December 2020)

ISSN Print: 2161-1203   ISSN Online: 2161-1211

Google-based Impact Factor: 1.05  Citations  

Third Order Adjoint Sensitivity and Uncertainty Analysis of an OECD/NEA Reactor Physics Benchmark: II. Computed Sensitivities

HTML  XML Download Download as PDF (Size: 3022KB)  PP. 529-558  
DOI: 10.4236/ajcm.2020.104030    411 Downloads   1,136 Views  Citations

ABSTRACT

This work presents the results of the exact computation of (180)3 = 5,832,000 third-order mixed sensitivities of the leakage response of a polyethylene-reflected plutonium (PERP) experimental benchmark with respect to the benchmark’s 180 microscopic total cross sections. This computation was made possible by applying the Third-Order Adjoint Sensitivity Analysis Methodology developed by Cacuci. The numerical results obtained in this work revealed that many of the 3rd-order sensitivities are significantly larger than their corresponding 1st- and 2nd-order ones, which is contrary to the widely held belief that higher-order sensitivities are all much smaller and hence less important than the first-order ones, for reactor physics systems. In particular, the largest 3rd-order relative sensitivity is the mixed sensitivity of the PERP leakage response with respect to the lowest energy-group (30) total cross sections of 1H (“isotope 6”) and 239Pu (“isotope 1”). These two isotopes are shown in this work to be the two most important parameters affecting the PERP benchmark’s leakage response. By comparison, the largest 1st-order sensitivity is that of the PERP leakage response with respect to the lowest energy-group total cross section of isotope 1H, having the value , while the largest 2nd-order sensitivity is . The 3rd-order sensitivity analysis presented in this work is the first ever such analysis in the field of reactor physics. The consequences of the results presented in this work on the uncertainty analysis of the PERP benchmark’s leakage response will be presented in a subsequent work.

Share and Cite:

Fang, R.X. and Cacuci, D.G. (2020) Third Order Adjoint Sensitivity and Uncertainty Analysis of an OECD/NEA Reactor Physics Benchmark: II. Computed Sensitivities. American Journal of Computational Mathematics, 10, 529-558. doi: 10.4236/ajcm.2020.104030.

Cited by

[1] Computation of High-Order Sensitivities of Model Responses to Model Parameters—I: Underlying Motivation and Current Methods
Energies, 2023
[2] 4th-Order-SENS: A Software Module for Efficient and Exact 4th-Order Sensitivity Analysis of Neutron Transport
Nuclear Science and Engineering, 2023
[3] Computation of High-Order Sensitivities of Model Responses to Model Parameters—I: Underlying Motivation and Current Methods. Energies 2023, 16, 6355
2023
[4] Advances in High-Order Sensitivity Analysis for Uncertainty Quantification and Reduction in Nuclear Energy Systems
Energies, 2022
[5] The nth-Order Comprehensive Adjoint Sensitivity Analysis Methodology, Volume I
2022
[6] Fifth-Order Comprehensive Adjoint Sensitivity Analysis Methodology for Nonlinear Systems (5th-CASAM-N): I. Mathematical Framework
American Journal of Computational Mathematics, 2022
[7] Sensitivity Analysis, Uncertainty Quantification and Predictive Modeling of Nuclear Energy Systems
Energies, 2022
[8] The nth-Order Comprehensive Adjoint Sensitivity Analysis Methodology for Response-Coupled Forward/Adjoint Linear Systems (nth-CASAM-L)
The nth-Order Comprehensive Adjoint Sensitivity …, 2022
[9] Overview of Arbitrarily High-Order Adjoint Sensitivity and Uncertainty Quantification Methodology for Large-Scale Systems
Energies, 2022
[10] On the Need to Determine Accurately the Impact of Higher-Order Sensitivities on Model Sensitivity Analysis, Uncertainty Quantification and Best-Estimate Predictions
Energies, 2021
[11] Fourth-Order Comprehensive Adjoint Sensitivity Analysis (4th-CASAM) of Response-Coupled Linear Forward/Adjoint Systems: I. Theoretical Framework
2021
[12] Fourth-Order Adjoint Sensitivity Analysis of an OECD/NEA Reactor Physics Benchmark: I. Mathematical Expressions and CPU-Time Comparisons for …
2021
[13] Fourth-Order Adjoint Sensitivity Analysis of an OECD/NEA Reactor Physics Benchmark: II. Mathematical Expressions and CPU-Time Comparisons for …
2021
[14] Fourth-Order Adjoint Sensitivity and Uncertainty Analysis of an OECD/NEA Reactor Physics Benchmark: I. Computed Sensitivities
2021
[15] High-Order Deterministic Sensitivity Analysis and Uncertainty Quantification: Review and New Developments
Energies, 2021
[16] Fourth-order adjoint sensitivity analysis of an OECD/NEA reactor physics benchmark: II. Mathematical expressions and CPU-time comparisons for computing …
American Journal of Computational Mathematics, 2021
[17] Fourth-Order Comprehensive Adjoint Sensitivity Analysis (4th-CASAM) of Response-Coupled Linear Forward/Adjoint Systems: I. Theoretical Framework …
2021
[18] Third Order Adjoint Sensitivity and Uncertainty Analysis of an OECD/NEA Reactor Physics Benchmark: III. Response Moments
2020
[19] Third-order adjoint sensitivity analysis of an OECD/NEA reactor physics benchmark: I. Mathematical framework
2020
[20] The nth-Order Comprehensive Adjoint Sensitivity Analysis Methodology, Volume II

Copyright © 2025 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.