Open Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology

Volume 9, Issue 10 (October 2019)

ISSN Print: 2160-8792   ISSN Online: 2160-8806

Google-based Impact Factor: 0.37  Citations  h5-index & Ranking

Comparison of Rapid Freezing and Vitrification for Human Sperm Cryopreservation Using Trehalose as a Cryoprotective Agent

HTML  XML Download Download as PDF (Size: 774KB)  PP. 1407-1418  
DOI: 10.4236/ojog.2019.910136    1,003 Downloads   2,812 Views  Citations

ABSTRACT

Rapid freezing and vitrification are becoming popular for human sperm cryopreservation; however, it remains unclear which method is better. The aims of the present study were to determine the optimal trehalose concentration and to compare the cryoprotective effects of rapid freezing and vitrification. The results showed that: 1) The optimal trehalose concentration was 0.25 mol/L; 2) The post-thaw recovery rates of total and progressive sperm motilities after rapid freezing (38.6% ± 3.0% and 41.1% ± 5.0%) were significantly higher (P < 0.05) than that after vitrification (26.1% ± 3.1% and 27.2% ± 1.3%) when 0.5 mL straws were used; 3) However, the recovery rates of total and progressive motilities after rapid freezing in 0.5 mL straw (26.7% ± 9.6% and 26.8% ± 8.7%) were significantly lower (P < 0.05) than that after vitrification in a novel straw-in-straw system (43.1% ± 4.2% and 41.8% ± 15.5%); and 4) The post-thaw sperm nuclear DNA damage level after rapid freezing in 0.5 mL straw (8.7% ± 2.8%) was not significantly different from that of sperm after vitrification in the straw-in-straw system (9.2% ± 2.5%). It was concluded that rapid freezing is superior to vitrification when using 0.5 mL straws; however, vitrification is superior to rapid freezing when using the straw-in-straw systems.

Share and Cite:

Hu, H. , Liu, R. , Shi, X. , Ji, G. , Zhang, J. , Zhang, H. , Wang, P. , Sun, Z. , Xiao, G. and Li, M. (2019) Comparison of Rapid Freezing and Vitrification for Human Sperm Cryopreservation Using Trehalose as a Cryoprotective Agent. Open Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 9, 1407-1418. doi: 10.4236/ojog.2019.910136.

Cited by

No relevant information.

Copyright © 2024 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.