Author(s)

Suat Erol Çelik, Ajlan Uzunkol, Buse Sarıgül, Halil Olgun Peker, Yunus Kurtuluş

Department of Neurosurgery, Okmeydanı Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.

Background: The treatment of cerebellar hemorrhage (CH) may be different surgery or conservative according to the hematoma volume, compression of vital structures or hydrocephalus existence. In the present study, the authors investigated the risk factors, the indications and the situation of external ventricular drainage (EVD) on the treatment line. Methods: 63 pure cerebellar hemorrhage patients were enrolled in the study. 36 cases underwent surgery; the other 27 were received conservative treatment. 15 and 13 cases received EVD in both groups. Hospital stay and mortality rates were investigated. Results: 4 cases in the conservative group underwent surgery secondary to treatment failure. Both of the groups had equal rates of morbidity and mortality. On the other hand, the group that received surgical intervention had shorter median hospital stay. The EVD does not seem to be life-saving at first but it gives time for preparing for surgery. Conclusions: We found that CH was strongly associated with early hydrocephalus and mortality. The early diagnosis and surgical evacuation of the mass are mandatory and life-saving if hematoma is larger than 10 ml. The EVD may not being a life-saving instrument but majorly it may be a time earning device if acute hydrocephalus present.

Cerebellar Hemorrhage, External Ventricular Drainage, Hydrocephalus, Hypertension

Çelik, S. , Uzunkol, A. , Sarıgül, B. , Peker, H. and Kurtuluş, Y. (2019) Is External Ventricular Drainage Life-Saving in Cerebellar Hemorrhages?. Open Journal of Modern Neurosurgery, 9, 154-163. doi: 10.4236/ojmn.2019.92015.