Failure of Media Self-Regulation? Documenting Stakeholders’ Attitude to the Botswana Media Complaints/Appeals Committees - Open Journal of Social Sciences

JSS > Vol.6 No.2, February 2018

Volume 6, Issue 2 (February 2018)

ISSN Print: 2327-5952 ISSN Online: 2327-5960

Google-based Impact Factor: 0.73 Citations

Failure of Media Self-Regulation? Documenting Stakeholders’ Attitude to the Botswana Media Complaints/Appeals Committees ()

HTML XML

Download as PDF (Size: 259KB) PP. 144-157

DOI: 10.4236/jss.2018.62013 842 Downloads 2,525 Views Citations

Author(s)

Eno Akpabio^*, Seamogano Mosanako

Affiliation(s)

Department of Media Studies, University of Botswana, Gaborone, Botswana.

ABSTRACT

In Botswana, efforts with self-regulation resulted in the setting up of the Media Complaints and Appeals Committees in 2005 under the aegis of the Botswana Press Council. This study sought to find out the attitude of stakeholders to the committees by conducting intensive interviews with complainants, editors as well as members of the complaints and appeals committees. There were variances in our findings with complainants largely dissatisfied with the committees’ work while the committees felt they had done a good job by providing fair rulings. And media editors said that they complied with rulings of the complaints and appeals committees but complainants took the opposite view. While two press councils are in existence at the moment, the object lesson from the Botswana scenario is that if the media are effective in their self-regulation initiatives, this will likely keep government-initiated statutory press councils at bay. The study concludes that perhaps, citizen involvement would serve to break the present impasse and ensure a media that truly serves the public interest.

KEYWORDS

Press Council, Ethics, Compliance, Botswana, Complaints Committee, Self-Regulation

Share and Cite:

Akpabio, E. and Mosanako, S. (2018) Failure of Media Self-Regulation? Documenting Stakeholders’ Attitude to the Botswana Media Complaints/Appeals Committees. Open Journal of Social Sciences, 6, 144-157. doi: 10.4236/jss.2018.62013.

Cited by

[1]	The Global Handbook of Media Accountability
	2022

[2]	Improving news media oversight: Why Australia needs a cross-platform standards scheme
	australian journalism review, 2022

[3]	Self-regulation and the Namibian media: A survey of Windhoek residents
	2021

[4]	Media accountability: A global perspective
	The Global Handbook …, 2021

[5]	Watching the Watchdogs: A Conceptual Model for Media Accountability in a Non-Western Country
	2021

[6]	Media Accountability im internationalen Vergleich–Medienselbstkontrolle und Medienverantwortung aus interkultureller Perspektive
	2020

Journals Menu

Follow SCIRP

	+1 323-425-8868
	customer@scirp.org
	+86 18163351462(WhatsApp)
	1655362766

	Paper Publishing WeChat

Journals Menu

Home

About SCIRP

Service

Policies