American Journal of Plant Sciences

Volume 8, Issue 4 (March 2017)

ISSN Print: 2158-2742   ISSN Online: 2158-2750

Google-based Impact Factor: 1.20  Citations  h5-index & Ranking

Effects of Different Planting Pattern of Maize (Zea mays L.) and Soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merrill) Intercropping in Resource Consumption on Fodder Yield, and Silage Quality

HTML  XML Download Download as PDF (Size: 327KB)  PP. 666-679  
DOI: 10.4236/ajps.2017.84046    2,185 Downloads   4,310 Views  Citations

ABSTRACT

An experiment was carried out at the field units of the north campus experimental areas in Northwest Agriculture and Forestry University, Yangling, Shaanxi Province, P. R. China. The experiment was conducted on summer season (June to September) to determine the effects of different planting patterns of maize and soybean intercropping in resource consumption on fodder yield and silage quality. The main treatments were one sole crop of maize (SM) and four maize-soybean intercropping patterns (1 row maize to 1 row soybean (1M1S), 1 row maize to 2 rows soybean (1M2S), 1 rows maize to 3 rows soybean (1M3S) and 2 rows maize to 1 row soybean (2M1S), respectively. The experiment was a randomized complete block design with three replications, and plot size of 12 m by 5 m. The crops were harvested when the maize reached at milk stage and soybean at R7 stage. The result indicated significant increase in fresh biomass and dry matter production of maize fodder alone as compared to maize intercropped with soybean fodder. It was correlated with a higher consumption of environmental resources, such as photosynthetically active radiation (PAR) and soil moisture by intercropping. After 45 days of ensiling period, silage samples were analyzed for pH, organic acids (Lactic, acetic, and butyric), dry matter (DM), crude protein (CP), ether extract (EE), neutral detergent fibre (NDF), acid detergent fibre (ADF), calcium (Ca), sodium (Na), phosphorus (P), magnesium (Mg), and potassium (K). It was concluded that in all intercropped silages, crude protein (CP) values were higher (1M1S, 12.1%; 1M2S, 12.2%; 1M3S, 12.4%; 2M1S, 12.1%) than the monocrop maize (SM, 8.7%) silage. Higher organic acids (p < 0.05) were produced in the 1M3S silages as compared to others silages. The study indicated that among all intercropped silages, the 1M3S (1 row maize to 3 rows soybean) was preferable according to nutrient composition than other intercropped silages.

Share and Cite:

Htet, M. , Soomro, R. and Bo, H. (2017) Effects of Different Planting Pattern of Maize (Zea mays L.) and Soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merrill) Intercropping in Resource Consumption on Fodder Yield, and Silage Quality. American Journal of Plant Sciences, 8, 666-679. doi: 10.4236/ajps.2017.84046.

Cited by

[1] Maize legume intercropping systems in southern Mexico: A review of benefits and challenges
Moreno… - Ciência Rural, 2022
[2] Legume Integration Augments the Forage Productivity and Quality in Maize-Based System in the Loess Plateau Region
Sustainability, 2022
[3] Intercropped maize‐soybean silage: Effects on forage yield, fermentation pattern and nutritional composition
Grassland …, 2022
[4] Assessing a century of maize and soybean polyculture for silage production
Agronomy Journal, 2022
[5] Nutritive Value and Silage Fermentation Characteristics of Forage Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L.) Genotypes and Lablab (Lablab purpureus L.) Mixture
American Journal of Plant …, 2022
[6] Efffect of Intercropping Double-Red Maize (Zea Maysl.) With Tephrosia (Tephrosia Bracteolataguill and Perr.) on Nutrient Quality of Maize Forage
Journal of Emerging …, 2021
[7] Corn-Soybean Intercropping Improved the Nutritional Quality of Forage Cultivated on Podzols in Boreal Climate
2021
[8] Evaluation of Nutritive Values through Comparison of Forage Yield and Silage Quality of Mono-Cropped and Intercropped Maize-Soybean Harvested at Two Maturity …
2021
[9] ẢNH HƯỞNG CỦA MỘT SỐ CÂY TRỒNG XEN VỚI NGÔ ĐẾN TÍNH CHẤT ĐẤT VÀ NĂNG SUẤT NGÔ TRỒNG TRÊN ĐẤT CÁT BIỂN TỈNH NGHỆ AN
2021
[10] Consórcio entre gramíneas e leguminosas para produção de silagens, fenos e pré-secados
2021
[11] Aspectos agronômicos e qualidade de silagens mistas oriundas dos consórcios de milho e crotalárias
2019
[12] IMPACT OF SPATIAL ARRANGEMENT ON GROWTH, YIELD AND PROFITABILITY OF MAIZE–GROUNDNUT INTERCROPPING SYSTEM
2019
[13] FACULDADE DE CIÊNCIAS AGRÁRIAS PROGRAMA DE PÓS-GRADUAÇÃO EM ZOOTECNIA
2019
[14] Dynamics and pest and natural enemies dispersion in cowpea and colored cotton in sole or intercropping systems
Doctoral Thesis, 2018
[15] “Luiz de Queiroz” College of Agriculture
2018
[16] Determination of Silage Yield and Quality of Grasspea+ Cereal Intercrops
2018
[17] Intercropping for enhancement and provisioning of ecosystem services in smallholder, rural farming systems in KwaZulu-Natal Province, South Africa: a review
2018
[18] Türk Tarım-Gıda Bilim ve Teknoloji Dergisi
2018
[19] Assessment of a novel soil nutrient imaging technique, forage productivity and the soil health status of silage corn and forage soybean cultivated as mono or intercrop …
2018
[20] E ciency of organic production model of colorful rice SR20 in the Southeast region of Vietnam

Copyright © 2024 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.