Journal of Environmental Protection

Volume 8, Issue 1 (January 2017)

ISSN Print: 2152-2197   ISSN Online: 2152-2219

Google-based Impact Factor: 1.15  Citations  h5-index & Ranking

The Land-Use Consequences of Woody Biomass with More Stringent Climate Mitigation Scenarios

HTML  XML Download Download as PDF (Size: 1049KB)  PP. 61-73  
DOI: 10.4236/jep.2017.81006    1,321 Downloads   2,200 Views  Citations

ABSTRACT

Integrated assessment models increasingly rely on biomass for energy with ever more stringent mitigation policies. The stringency of mitigation will therefore have large effects on land use. As discussed in the literature, crop bio-energy will lead to substantial pressure to increase deforestation. This paper consequently explores using woody biomass for bioenergy. The paper combines the IAM WITCH with a global dynamic forestry model GTM to determine the optimal size of the woody biomass market, the effects on the timber market, and the resulting forestland under two alternative mitigation strategies. This paper predicts that moving from a moderate to a stringent mitigation policy would increase the demand for woody biomass from 3.7 to 5.2 billion m3/yr, increasing forestland by 1049 to 1890 million ha, and shrinking farmland by 748 to 1550 million ha. The stringency of mitigation will therefore have large effects on land use.

Share and Cite:

Favero, A. and Mendelsohn, R. (2017) The Land-Use Consequences of Woody Biomass with More Stringent Climate Mitigation Scenarios. Journal of Environmental Protection, 8, 61-73. doi: 10.4236/jep.2017.81006.

Cited by

[1] The economic and environmental performance of biomass as an “intermediate” resource for power production
2019
[2] The Net Carbon Emissions from Historic Land Use and Land Use Change
2019
[3] Which practices co‐deliver food security, climate change mitigation and adaptation, and combat land degradation and desertification?
2019
[4] Which practices co-deliver food security, climate change mitigation and adaptation, and combat land degradation and desertification?
2019
[5] Moral Conflicts of a 'Green Pathway'to limit Global Warming “to well below 2◦ C” regarding the Human Right to Adequate Food
2019
[6] Interlinkages between Desertification, Land Degradation, Food Security and GHG fluxes: 2 synergies, trade-offs and Integrated Response 3 Options 4
2019
[7] Moral Conflicts of a 'Green Pathway'to limit Global Warming “to wellbelow 2◦ C” regarding the Human Right to Adequate Food
2019
[8] Cumulative Global Forest Carbon Implications of Regional Bioenergy Expansion Policies
Resource and Energy Economics, 2018
[9] Estimating future wood outtakes in the Norwegian forestry sector under the shared socioeconomic pathways
Global Environmental Change, 2018
[10] Sustainable energy options and implications for land use
2017
[11] Using forests for climate mitigation: sequester carbon or produce woody biomass?
Climatic Change, 2017
[12] Impact of the 2° C target on global woody biomass use
Forest Policy and Economics, 2017
[13] Energy and land use
2017
[14] Impacts of Long-Term Strategies for the Swedish Forest Sector: Analyses with the Bioframe Integrated Modelling Framework

Copyright © 2024 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.